Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.10s
Hasalia v. Walker (In Re Walker)
416 B.R. 449 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · Jun 26, 2009
Res judicata is Inapplicable to this Dischargeability Litigation Under the Supreme Court’s Rulings in Brown v. Felsen and Archer v. Warner. In Broum v. Felsen, the U.S. … Archer was based on Brown v. Felsen. Id. at 319, 123 S.Ct. 1462 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedAngueira v. Trujillo (In re Ortega)
562 B.R. 538 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · Nov 22, 2016
Now having to address this issue directly, this Court agrees with Judge Glenn’s conclusion in Haisfield and with Judge Olson’s conclusion in Brown v. Lu-boff (In re: Sigma-Tech Sales, Inc.), 2016 WL 4224090 (Bankr. S.D. … The Trustee cited Gilbert v. Doris R.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTomlinson v. Clem (In re Clem)
583 B.R. 329 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Dec 21, 2017
In summary, Brown v. … Significantly, the Supreme Court noted that the Brown v.
Reversed by Clem v. Tomlinson, 124 F.4th 341 (2024)Cited 18 timesPublished302 B.R. 637 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · Nov 24, 2003
Brown asserts that Debtor Sandra Jean Brown should be denied a discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727 (a)(4). … Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 286 , 111 S.Ct. 654 , 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991).
Cited 5 timesPublished37 B.R. 295 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · Nov 23, 1983
WILLIAM BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. … See also In re Sponge, 661 F.2d 6 (2d Cir.1981); In re Calhoun, supra; Goggans v. Osborn, 237 F.2d 186 (9th Cir.1956).
Cited 6 timesPublished288 B.R. 707 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2003
Gianakas v. Gianakas (In re Gianakas), 917 F.2d 759, 761 (3d Cir.1990). She must do so by a preponderance of the evidence. Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279 , 111 S.Ct. 654, 659-61 , 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991). … Mendez v. Mendez (In re Mendez), 275 B.R. 482, 488 (Bankr. W.D.Pa.2001); also Stahl v.
Cited 3 timesPublished191 B.R. 99 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Sep 11, 1995
Donna Marie Brown (“Donna” or “Debt- or”) claims a homestead exemption under Texas law in her property at 1411 Harris Lane. Her ex-husband Doran Lee Brown (“Doran” or “Brown”) has objected to her claim of exemption. … See Eggemeyer v. Eggemeyer, 623 S.W.2d 462, 465 (Tex.App.—Waco 1981, writ dism’d w.o.j.). Brown correctly asserts, however, that each family may claim only one homestead. Hillock Homes, Inc. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished74 B.R. 968 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Jun 25, 1987
Beede v. Beede, 186 Conn. 191, 195 [ 440 A.2d 283 ] (1982). Forsdick v. Turgeon, supra, slip op. at 5, quoting Weiman v. Weiman, 188 Conn. 232, 234 , 449 A.2d 151 (1982). … Brown v. David R. Brown, Superior Court of the State of Connecticut, Judicial District of Fairfield at Stamford, Docket No. FA 79 0042043 (July 30, 1980). 2 . Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1. 3 . Plaintiffs Exhibit 2. 4 .
Cited 11 timesPublished177 B.R. 116 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 1, 1994
Brown (Debt- or) in the above-captioned adversary proceeding in which the Debtor names as defendants Frances R. Brown (Ms. Brown), Jeanne L. Coleman (Ms. Coleman), Steven T. Northcutt (Mr. Northcutt) and Stephen W. … Baucom v. Baucom, 397 So.2d 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Hope v. Lipkin, 156 So.2d 659 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963).
Cited 6 timesPublished331 B.R. 243 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · Jun 16, 2005
BACKGROUND On November 12, 2003, Linda Kay Brown, aka Linda Earl, the debtor, filed a Chapter 7 petition for relief. On January 15, 2004, Frank A. … Geiger v.
Cited 6 timesPublished46 B.R. 612 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 19, 1985
This matter came on for trial on 7 November 1984 upon the complaint of Charma Lee Brown (hereinafter Charma) filed 23 January 1981 and the Answer of Defendant, John Weldon Brown (hereinafter John) filed 16 March 1981. … Gerdes, 33 B.R. 860 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1983); In Re Jacobs, 83-0720 (at Dayton, 1984, unreported); Lincoln v. Phillips, 31 B.R. 398 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1983); Van Hoose v. Van Hoose, 31 B.R. 332 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1983); Castle v.
Cited 8 timesPublished287 B.R. 658 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Dec 9, 2002
Corp. v. … Reading Co. v. Brown, 391 U.S. 471 , 88 S.Ct. 1759 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 (1968). In Reading, it was alleged (and ultimately held by the Court) that a post-petition tort could give rise to an administrative expense claim.
Reversed on other grounds by Chase Manhattan Bank USA NA v. Stembridge, 394 F.3d 383 (2004)Cited 3 timesPublished36 B.R. 103 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · Mar 29, 1983
Matter of Steingesser, 602 F.2d 36 (2d Cir.1979); Poolman v. Poolman, 289 F.2d 332 (8th Cir.1961); 2. Whether there was a wide disparity in the parties’ incomes. Matter of Woods, 561 F.2d 27 (7th Cir.1977); and 3. … Nitz v. Nitz, 568 F.2d 148 (10th Cir.1977). Here the Court finds that extrinsic evidence should be considered because the Browns’ intent cannot be gleaned from the divorce decree alone.
Cited 6 timesPublished21 B.R. 377 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · Jul 6, 1982
Thus, on June 26, 1981, the date that the United States Supreme Court filed its decision in the case of McCarty v. … In the recent case of Powell v. Powell, 454 U.S. 1050 , 102 S.Ct. 592 , 70 L.Ed.2d 585 , the United States Supreme Court held that the McCarty decision, supra, does have a limited retroactive application.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLowther v. Insley (In Re Insley)
322 B.R. 272 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 25, 2005
BAP 1996) (same, citing, inter alia, Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151-52 , 104 S.Ct. 1723, 1725-26 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984), and Irwin v. … As support for such argument by Lowther, Lowther cites to Silk v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedStrauss v. Brown (In re Brown)
531 B.R. 236 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · May 13, 2015
McCormick v. Security State Bank, 822 F.2d 806, 808 (8th Cir.1987). … Chalik v. Moorefield (In re Chalik), 748 F.2d 616, 619-20 (11th Cir.1984). A finding of “intent” is not required. Nof v. Gannon (In re Gannon), 173 B.R. 313 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1997).
Cited 10 timesPublished205 B.R. 278 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · Jan 24, 1997
Co. v. … Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedGrassmann v. Brown (In re Brown)
570 B.R. 98 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 23, 2017
At the time of the sale, the State of Oklahoma, specifically the Oklahoma Funeral Board (“OFB”), held a judgment lien on the Property (the “OFB Lien”). … Gullickson v. Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1292 (10th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted); Kansas State Bank & Trust v. Vickers (In re Vickers), 577 F.2d 683, 687 (10th Cir. 1978); Stewart, 421 B.R. 603, *2 .
Cited 16 timesPublishedBrown v. Shriver (In Re Brown)
39 B.R. 820 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 3, 1984
Brown (“Brown”), drove his car into Seat’s home causing approximately $1,500 in damage. Brown was criminally charged with driving under the influence. … Seat will be enjoined from receiving restitution from Brown. 19 An appropriate order will be entered. 1 . See Whitaker v. Lockert, 16 B.R. 917 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Tenn.1982); Holder v.
Cited 30 timesPublished56 B.R. 954 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · Jan 24, 1986
Brown v. … Id. at 519 , citing Brown v. Felsen 442 U.S. at 132 , 99 S.Ct. at 2210 (citations omitted). In the instant case, the state court ruled on the breach of contract action.
Cited 42 timesPublished
Ask Donna