Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFBOH

676 results

1.65s

  • Brown v. Brown (In Re Brown)

    46 B.R. 612 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 19, 1985

    This matter came on for trial on 7 November 1984 upon the complaint of Charma Lee Brown (hereinafter Charma) filed 23 January 1981 and the Answer of Defendant, John Weldon Brown (hereinafter John) filed 16 March 1981. … Gerdes, 33 B.R. 860 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1983); In Re Jacobs, 83-0720 (at Dayton, 1984, unreported); Lincoln v. Phillips, 31 B.R. 398 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1983); Van Hoose v. Van Hoose, 31 B.R. 332 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1983); Castle v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Zoltanski v. Brown (In Re Brown)

    33 B.R. 219 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 1983

    In In re Ford, 3 B.R. 559 , 6 B.C.D. 202 (Bkrtcy.D.Md.1980),, aff’d Greenblati v. … See Morris v. Ivey (In re Ivey), 10 B.R. 230 , 7 B.C.D. 562 (Bkrtcy.N.D.Ga.1981).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Moss (In Re Brown)

    145 B.R. 239 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 16, 1992

    Brown’s children. Id. at 2. … Brown “owes a duty of support to his minor children.” Id. at 1.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown Family Farms, Inc. v. Brown (In Re Brown Family Farms, Inc.)

    80 B.R. 404 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 1, 1987

    Butcher v. Kagey Lumber Co., 164 Ohio St. 85 , 90, 128 N.E.2d 54 (1955); Williams v. Sprigg, 6 Ohio St. 585 , 594-597 (1856); Ranney v. Hardy-Zeller v. … Earlier, in Williams v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Snow v. Brown (In Re Brown)

    263 B.R. 832 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 8, 2000

    Markowitz v. Campbell (In re Markowitz), 190 F.3d 455, 464 (6th Cir.1999). … Gonzalez v. Moffitt (In re Moffitt), 252 B.R. 916, 921 (6th Cir. BAP 2000).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ledford v. Brown (In re Brown)

    48 B.R. 19 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 12, 1984

    Brown, filed a Chapter 13 petition on July 12, 1984. He is the owner of a 1980 Ford Mustang with a fair market value of $3,600, which he claimed is entirely exempt by virtue of 11 U.S.C. § 522 (d). … Debtor then cites in support this Court’s prior opinion in In re Lewis 38 B.R. 113 , 10 C.B.C.2d 437 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1984), the Supreme Court of Ohio’s opinion, State, Ex rel, v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (In Re Brown)

    27 B.R. 151 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 7, 1982

    The fact that the judgment creditor would have received no dividends if he had been able to prove his claim was not a sufficient reason to disregard the mandate of Section 17(a)(3) of the Bankruptcy Act; Milando v. … Hill v. Smith, 260 U.S. 592 , 43 S.Ct. 219 , 67 L.Ed. 419 (1923); Milando, supra.; In re McNeil, supra.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Suhar v. Brown (In re Brown)

    581 B.R. 255 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 28, 2016

    Brown, vendee [sic] in consideration of Divorce/Dissolution proceedings .... ” (Jt. Ex. V at 1.) … V at 1.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (In Re Brown)

    247 B.R. 228 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 13, 2000

    See Sands v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. … Young v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ohio Ex Rel. Brown v. Kovacs (In Re Kovacs)

    29 B.R. 816 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 23, 1982

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ledford v. First National Bank of Dayton (In re Brown)

    46 B.R. 615 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 19, 1985

    Brown (the Debtor) filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 on 5 July 1984. … As opined by this court in Butz v. Pingel, 17 B.R. 236 (Bkrtcy.Ohio 1982) and cited with approval in the Arnett case, 731 F.2d at p. 364 , the first inquiry is the intention of the parties.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)

    13 B.R. 832 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 31, 1981

    United States v. New York Rayon Importing Co., 329 U.S. 654 , 67 S.Ct. 601 , 91 L.Ed. 577 (1947) and Stanley v. Schwalby, 162 U.S. 255 , 16 S.Ct. 754 , 40 L.Ed. 960 (1896). … In support thereof, Kent cites Boddie v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Friedly v. Niswonger (In Re Niswonger)

    116 B.R. 562 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 1990

    U.S. v. Kasuboski, 834 F.2d 1345 , 1350 (7th Cir. 1987); Rainbolt v. Johnson, 669 F.2d 767, 768 (D.C.Cir.1981); National Advertising Co., Inc. v. Dick, 640 F.Supp. 1474, 1475 (S.D.Ind.1986); Goodnow v. … (See also, Kelly v. Robinson 479 U.S. 36 , 107 S.Ct. 353 , 93 L.Ed.2d 216 (1986)) The admissions, and exhibits clearly establish the necessary elements of the Browns’ § 523(a)(2)(A) claim.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hunter v. Brown (In re Babcock Dairy Co. of Ohio)

    70 B.R. 679 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 9, 1986

    Hunter v. Pool Pals Manufacturing, Inc., supra. Rather, an insider may be any person or entity whose relationship with the debtor is sufficiently close so as to subject the relationship to careful scrutiny. Lingley v. … Although the Trustee has argued that the decision in Loftis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shafer v. Wintrow (In Re Wintrow)

    57 B.R. 695 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 12, 1986

    Chemical Construction Corp., 456 U.S. 461 , 102 S.Ct. 1883 , 72 L.Ed.2d 262 (1982); Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984); Marrese v. … See Johnson’s Island, Inc. v. Board of Township Trustees, 69 Ohio St.2d 241 , 431 N.E.2d 672 , 674-75 (1982), Stromberg v. Board of Education of Bratenahl, 64 Ohio St.2d 98 , 413 N.E.2d 1184, 1186 (1980); Norwood v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • National Credit Union Administration Board v. Zovkic (In re Zovkic)

    564 B.R. 291 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2016

    The cases cited by the Board to excuse it from proving that it relied on any representation made by the debtor do not support its position under the facts of this case. For example, in Yarbrow v. … The Board did not, therefore, prove this claim under § 523(a)(2)(A). V. The § 523(a)(2)(B) Claim St.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pesak v. Weitzel (In Re Weitzel)

    72 B.R. 253 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 24, 1987

    See Brown v. … In Brown v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ohio Department of Taxation

    United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 21, 2019

    Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586-88 (1986); Rose v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 766 F.3d 532, 535 (6th Cir. 2014). … Meeting its obligation under Celotex Corp v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Asea Brown Boveri, Inc. (In Re Grand Eagle Companies, Inc.)

    288 B.R. 484 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 14, 2003

    Zahn v. … See also, Minkoff v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Hunter v. St. Vincent Medical Center (In Re Parkview Hospital)

    211 B.R. 619 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 31, 1997

    In Brown v. … In Brown v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.