Case law

Napshin v. Goetz (In Re Goetz)

134 B.R. 367 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 5, 1991

In Brown v. … As a result, Brown v.

Matter of Keiser

35 B.R. 496 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Nov 9, 1983

It provides that his wife will pay off the amount due GMAC, $750, so that Browning and Vanier alone are to receive payments under the plan. … Deans v. O’Donnell, 692 F.2d 968 (4th Cir.1982). Debtor and his wife made a mortgage application and were turned down apparently because of the wage attachment.

Volvo White Truck Corp. v. Chambersburg Beverage, Inc. (In Re White Motor Credit Corp.)

75 B.R. 944 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 22, 1987

Recent case law suggests Brown’s claims arose, at the latest, when the primary action which might result in the right to indemnity is commenced. Avellino and Bienes v. M. … Brown’s claims, therefore, arose pre-confirmation. For reasons setforth above, the sale was free and clear of all Defendants’ claims.

In Re Albertson

68 B.R. 1017 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 14, 1987

In Bob Jones the court rejected the plain language argument of the university, quoting Brown v. … Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1, 11 , 82 S.Ct. 595 , 592, 7 L.Ed.2d 492 (1962) (quoting) Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 350 U.S. 270, 285 , 76 S.Ct. 349, 359 , 100 L.Ed. 309 (1956).

In re Sabine Oil & Gas Corp.

547 B.R. 503 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Mar 31, 2016

Corp. v. … Lee, a member of the board of directors of Legacy Forest; (iv) Mr. James D. Lightner, Chairman of the board of directors of Legacy Forest; (v) Mr. Raymond I.

Wood v. Jasperson (In Re Jasperson)

116 B.R. 740 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · Jul 12, 1990

(quoting Voytko v. Ramada Inn of Atlantic City, 445 F.Supp. 315, 325 (D.C.N.J.1978)). … Brown, Helen L. Brown, (“Browns”) and Jasperson Realty, Inc. failed to comply with certain statutory disclosure requirements.

In Re Arch Wireless

332 B.R. 241 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 13, 2005

Mullane v. Cent Hanover Bank & Trust, 339 U.S. 306, 314 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950); 10 see also Francis v. … Auto Supply Co. v. Savage Arms, Inc.

In re Sundance Self Storage-El Dorado LP

482 B.R. 613 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · Nov 6, 2012

Dye v. Brown (In re AFI Holding, Inc.) (AFI Holding I), 355 B.R. 139, 148-49 (9th Cir. BAP 2006). … See, e.g., Kun v.

In Re Brigance

219 B.R. 486 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · Mar 13, 1998

In State of Mississippi v. … (citing Bell v. Tindall, 215 Miss. 343 , 60 So.2d 801, 804 (1952) and Evans v. National Bank of Savannah, 251 U.S. 108, 113-14 , 40 S.Ct. 58, 59-60 , 64 L.Ed. 171 (1919)). In Miller v.

United States v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)

137 B.R. 925 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · Aug 8, 1991

See Brown v. Felsen, 111 S.Ct. at 137 . … Such a result would be consistent with neither the purpose of statutes of repose nor with the underlying rationale of Brown v. Felsen.

Berger v. Schuler (In Re Schuler)

45 B.R. 684 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · Jan 11, 1985

In the wake of Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50 , 102 S.Ct. 2858 , 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982), there remained some question whether section 1478 might yet have vitality.

Westside Utilities, Inc. v. Robert E. Ratliff Co. (In Re Westside Utilities, Inc.)

53 B.R. 254 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · Aug 27, 1985

Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 401 , 101 S.Ct. 2424, 2429 , 69 L.Ed.2d 103 (1981). As applied to the bankruptcy courts, the previous rulings are not without exception. The case of Brown v. … Brown is a case dealing with § 17(a)(2) of the 1898 Bankruptcy Act. The facts are as follows: Brown, the plaintiff, guaranteed loans made to Felsen, the defendant.

Sunburst Bank v. Findley (In Re Findley)

76 B.R. 547 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · Nov 25, 1987

State v. … (emphasis added) Hogan v.

D. M. Barber, Inc. v. Valverde (In Re D. M. Barber, Inc.)

13 B.R. 962 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Sep 11, 1981

In a recent decision, Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. … However the case law reflects that the proceedings by the Board are not to adjudicate private rights but to effectuate public policy, N.L.R.B. v.

Collins v. Sydow (In re NC12, Inc.)

478 B.R. 820 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Aug 28, 2012

See Boles v. … Brown v. Chesnut (In re Chesnut), 356 Fed.Appx. 732, 734 (5th Cir.2009) (citing Brown v. Chesnut (In re Chesnut), 422 F.3d 298, 303-04 (5th Cir.2005)).

In re Shepherd

490 B.R. 338 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · Mar 28, 2013

Cf., Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Fitzgerald, 272 F.2d 121, 129 (10th Cir.1959); U.S. v. … See, Lundin & Brown, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, § 7.8, at ¶ 1, (citing Bunch v. Hopkins Sav. Bank, 249 B.R. 667, 668 (Bankr.D.Md.2000)). .

Terrell v. United States (In Re Terrell)

65 B.R. 365 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · Jun 23, 1986

See United States v. Pomponio, 635 F.2d 293 (4th Cir.1980); Brown v. United States, 591 F.2d 1136 (5th Cir.1979) 3 ; Anderson v. United States, 561 F.2d 162 (8th Cir.1977); Lesser v. … Liddon v. United States, 448 F.2d 509, 512 (5th Cir.1971) (quoting Monday v. United States, 421 F.2d 1210, 1214-15 (7th Cir.1970) (emphasis added and citations omitted); see Brown v.

Hamilton County Board of County Commissioners v. Cincinnati Entertainment Associates, Ltd. (In re Cincinnati Entertainment Associates, Ltd.)

270 B.R. 853 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 28, 2001

On May 22, 2001, the Hamilton County Board of County Commissioners (hereafter “Claimant”), timely filed a cure claim asserting that it is due the amount of $47,161.00 on account of a pre-petition default in a lease agreement … Claimant argues further that Software Clearing House, Inc. v. Intrak, Inc., 66 Ohio App.3d 163, 171 , 583 N.E.2d 1056 (1990) compels a conclusion that the consensual something was a modification of the Lease Agreement.

Shaefer v. Demar (In Re Demar)

373 B.R. 232 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Aug 13, 2007

In re Beeber, 239 B.R. 13, 31 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1999) (citing In re Kokoszka, 479 F.2d 990, 997 (2d Cir.1973) cert. granted sub nom., Kokoszka v. … See 5A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1357 at 301 (Civ.2d 1990); Fredyma v. At &T Network Systems, Inc., 935 F.2d 368 (1st Cir.1991); Bayron v. Trudeau, 702 F.2d 43, 45 (2d Cir. 1983).

Giordano v. Johnstone (In Re Packer Avenue Associates)

1 B.R. 286 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1979

Fahringer v. Strine’s Estate, 420 Pa. 48 , 216 A.2d 82 (1966). Hedden v. … Brown, 391 U.S. 471, 483 , 88 S.Ct. 1759 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 (1968), interpreted the actual and necessary costs of § 64(a)(1) to include “costs ordinarily incident to operation of a business and not be limited to costs without