Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

10,000+ results

1.72s

  • Grigsby v. Thorp Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Grigsby)

    119 B.R. 479 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1990

    Compare Brown, supra, 106 B.R. at 856-61 . … Celona v.

    Vacated on other grounds by Grigsby v. Thorp Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Grigsby), 127 B.R. 759 (1991)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Hackerman v. Demeza (In re Demeza)

    570 B.R. 33 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 2017

    Corp. v. White Consol. Industries, Inc., 998 F.2d 1192, 1196 (3d Cir. 1993); Taylor v. Henderson, 2015 WL 452405 , at *1 (D.Del., Jan. 30, 2015). … See Price v. Brown, 545 Pa. 216, 221 , 680 A.2d 1149, 1151-52 (1996). Ordinary commercial relationships are excluded from the reach of § 523(a)(4). In re Coley, 433 B.R. 476, 496-97 (Bankr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Fortune Natural Resources Corp.

    366 B.R. 558 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 12, 2007

    BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. … Pepper v. Litton. 308 U.S. 295, 307-08 , 60 S.Ct. 238 , 84 L.Ed. 281 (1939). 19 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Radnor Holdings Corp. v. Tennenbaum Capital Partners, LLC (In Re Radnor Holdings Corp.)

    353 B.R. 820 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Nov 17, 2006

    See In re Mid-American Waste, 284 B.R. at 65 (party objecting to properly filed proof of claim bears the initial burden of presenting sufficient evidence to overcome the presumed validity and amount of claim); Brown v. … Feliciano was a board member does not make TCP an insider. See Gray v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • In Re Goodbar

    456 B.R. 644 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · Jun 29, 2011

    See e.g., Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n v. Serv. News Co., 898 F.2d 958, 965 (4th Cir.1990), Barber v. … Brown, Esquire; to the Chapter 13 Trustee, Herbert L. Beskin, Esquire; and to the U.S. Trustee, Margaret K. Garber, Esquire. 1 . But did not withdraw the Motion to Sell. 2 . Goodbar v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In re Taggart

    522 B.R. 627 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Dec 16, 2014

    Brown, Terry W. … Brown. . An alleged violation of the discharge injunction is pursued, as in this case, by a motion invoking the contempt remedies allowed for in § 105(a). See Walls v.

    Reversed by In re: Bradley Weston Taggart, 548 B.R. 275 (2016)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • IBD, Inc. v. Jenkins (In re Jenkins)

    462 B.R. 822 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · Nov 21, 2011

    Debtor did not disclose his plans to form a new company (named EBS) to IBD’s remaining board member. … Kitch, 542 F.2d 550 (10th Cir.1976); Parsons Mobile Products, Inc. v. Remmert, 216 Kan. 256 , 531 P.2d 428 (1975); Newton v. Hornblower, 224 Kan. 506 , 582 P.2d 1136 (1978)). . Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Simmons v. Johnson, Curney & Fields, P.C. (In Re Simmons)

    205 B.R. 834 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · Feb 3, 1997

    Partnership v. Brown (In re Eastland Partners Ltd. Partnership), 199 B.R. 917, 919 (Bankr.E.D.Mich.1996) (describing “cases under title 11” as those “which involve causes of action created by title 11”). … Partnership v. Brown (In re Eastland Partners Ltd. Partnership), 199 B.R. 917, 920 (Bankr.E.D.Mich.1996).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • B.W. Development Co. v. John B. Pike & Son, Inc. (In Re B.W. Development Co.)

    49 B.R. 129 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · Apr 10, 1985

    WILLIAM BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter is before the Court on Motion to Dismiss by the defendant, John B. Pike & Son, Inc. … Pike contends that due process requires that in personam jurisdiction of this court is limited by the minimum contacts doctrine of International Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Clayter v. Larkin (In Re Clayter)

    174 B.R. 134 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · Oct 5, 1994

    Gardner v. … Larkin; Thome, Larkin, Brown, Inc. d/b/a Coldwell Banker, Thorne, Larkin, Brown Realtors; and Larkin Homes, Inc. appear by their attorney, Stanley E. Oyler of Ascough, Eschmann, Oyler, P.A., Topeka, Kansas.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Doly v. Chang (In Re Joy Recovery Technology Corp.)

    286 B.R. 54 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Nov 20, 2002

    See Moody v. … Brown v. Third Nat’l Bank, 67 F.3d 1348 , 1357 (8th Cir.1995). Chang is not eligible for the protection under the safe-harbor provision of § 550(b)(1).

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Buckeye Retirement Co. v. Heil (In Re Heil)

    289 B.R. 897 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 21, 2003

    Brown. … Keeney, 227 F.3d at 686 (quoting Gullickson v. Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1294 (10th Cir.1997)). In other words, “[a] claim is material if it hinders the administration of the [bankruptcy] estate.” Calisoff v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Estate of Schubert v. Rudd (In Re Rudd)

    104 B.R. 8 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · Jan 8, 1987

    The issue in Brown v. … Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 896 104 S.Ct. 892, 896 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56, 63 (1984). See also, Marrese v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Burtch v. Seaport Capital, LLC (In re Direct Response Media, Inc.)

    466 B.R. 626 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Jan 12, 2012

    In re The Brown Schools, 368 B.R. 394, 408 (Bankr.D.Del.2007) (citing 10 Del. C. § 8106). … The Brown Schools II, 386 B.R. 37, 55-56 (Bankr.D.Del.2008) (citing In re Oakwood Homes Corp., 340 B.R. 510, 536 (Bankr. D.Del.2006)); See also Kaliner v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • In re Brown

    547 B.R. 846 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · Mar 18, 2016

    Brown v. Billingslea (In re Brown), No. SC-14-1388-JUKLPA, 2015 WL 6470940 , at *11, 2015 *850 Bankr.LEXIS 3625, at *31 (9th Cir. BAP Oct. 26, 2015). … Miller v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Stricklen v. W.D. Ford Direct Consolidation (In Re Stricklen)

    224 B.R. 905 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · Aug 20, 1998

    Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548 ; Richmond v. Board of Regents of University of Minnesota, 957 F.2d 595 , 597 (8th Cir. 1992). 3 . … N.D.Ohio 1990)), or rejected by later authority in the same district, see In re Cobb, 196 B.R. 34 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1996) (rejecting In re Brown, 4 B.R. 745 (Bankr.E.D.Va. 1980)).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Meeks v. Healthcorp of Tennessee, Inc. (In Re Southern Health Care of Arkansas, Inc.)

    314 B.R. 769 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · Sep 9, 2004

    Raytech Corp. v. Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Raytech Corp., 217 B.R. 679, 685 (Bankr.D.Conn.1998). The Raytech court stated that, [t]he “narrower principle” of collateral estoppel, see Brown v. … The Court also notes that The Brown Agency was sued in the RICO Suit but not in the Adversary Proceeding. 3 . The Court is aware of, and distinguishes, Ruple v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • LB Steel, LLC v. Walsh Construction Co. (In re LB Steel, LLC)

    547 B.R. 790 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 29, 2016

    Brown v. Bowman, 668 F.3d 437, 442 (7th Cir.2012). Rather, the remedy for a party seeking review of a state court decision is the pursuit of a state court appeal. Long v. Shorebank Dev. … Barnhill v. Johnson, 503 U.S. 393, 398 , 112 S.Ct. 1386 , 118 L.Ed.2d 39 (1992); Butner v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Roach v. Edge (In Re Edge)

    60 B.R. 690 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 9, 1986

    Chicago Board of Trade v. … See also Brown v. O’Keefe, 300 U.S. 598 , 57 S.Ct. 543 , 81 L.Ed. 827 (1937)....

    Cited 81 timesPublished
  • Barber v. Golden Seed Co. (In re Ostrom-Martin, Inc.)

    191 B.R. 126 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · Jan 11, 1996

    The Supreme Court in BFP v. … See City of Chicago v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.