Case law

Shafer v. Wintrow (In Re Wintrow)

57 B.R. 695 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 12, 1986

Chemical Construction Corp., 456 U.S. 461 , 102 S.Ct. 1883 , 72 L.Ed.2d 262 (1982); Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984); Marrese v. … See Johnson’s Island, Inc. v. Board of Township Trustees, 69 Ohio St.2d 241 , 431 N.E.2d 672 , 674-75 (1982), Stromberg v. Board of Education of Bratenahl, 64 Ohio St.2d 98 , 413 N.E.2d 1184, 1186 (1980); Norwood v.

Mehlman v. New York City Board of Education (In Re Mehlman)

268 B.R. 379 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Oct 16, 2001

See Burks v. … Burks v. State of Louisiana Board of Regents (In re Burks), 244 F.3d 1245 (11th Cir.2001).

Matthews v. Pacific & Southwest Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church (In Re Pacific Homes)

1 B.R. 574 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · Dec 5, 1979

Hutton & Company v. Brown, 305 F.Supp. 371, 394 (S.D.Texas 1969); Marketti v. Fitzsimmons, 373 F.Supp. 637, 639 (W.D.Wis.1974); First Wisconsin Corporation, 422 F.Supp. 493, 496 (E.D.Wis.1976). … Hutton & Co. v. Brown, 305 F.Supp. 371, 395 (S.D.Tex.1969), this would undermine public confidence in the legal system as a means for adjudicating disputes.

In Re De Kleinman

150 B.R. 524 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Apr 20, 1992

Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 , 103 S.Ct. 400, 402 , 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982). See also Leonhard v. … This district has consistently adhered to this traditional jurisdictional rule, see Brown’s Hotel, 93 B.R. 49 , United States Lines, Inc. v. GAC Marine Fuels, Ltd.

Lux v. County of Spotsylvania Board of Supervisors (In Re Lux)

159 B.R. 458 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Oct 27, 1992

Cournoyer v. Town of Lincoln, 790 F.2d 971, 977 (1st Cir.1986).

Friedman v. Huriash (In Re Huriash)

26 B.R. 372 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · Dec 28, 1982

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 139, at n. 10 , 99 S.Ct. 2213, at n. 10 . Such countervailing statutory policy has been found to exist in bankruptcy law, see Houtman v. … Mann, In re Houtman, 568 F.2d 651 (9th Cir.1978), but the Supreme Court in Brown v. Felsen declined to reach that issue.

Smith v. Smith (In re Smith)

489 B.R. 875 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · Apr 2, 2013

Augustus v. Board of Public Instruction of Escambia County, Florida, 306 F.2d 862, 868 (5th Cir.1962) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir.1953)). … Barth Industries, Inc., 160 F.3d 1322 , 1326 n. 6 (11th Cir.1998); Anderson v. District Board of Trustees of Central Florida Community College, 77 F.3d 364, 366 (11th Cir.1996)).

King v. Board of Supervisors (In Re A.G. Van Metre, Jr., Inc.)

155 B.R. 118 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Mar 23, 1993

. -[$700,000.00] $67,000.00 (v) payment of secured statutory tax lien to the extent not paid in (iii). -[$18,000.00] $49,000.00 (vi) remainder to the estate. … See Pearbtein v. Small Business Administration, 719 F.2d 1169, 1175-76 (D.C.Cir.1983). In Virginia, real estate tax liens have priority status.

Brown v. United States Internal Revenue Service (In Re Larry's Marineland of Richmond, Inc.)

166 B.R. 871 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · Dec 20, 1993

Brown, is the duly appointed and qualified chapter 7 trustee of the debtor. … The first two contentions are disposed of by the decision of the court in City of New York v. Johnson, 137 F.2d 163 (2d Cir.1943). See also 11 U.S.C. § 545 (2) and United States v.

Ray v. Oregon Ex Rel. Construction Contractors Board (In Re Ray)

355 B.R. 253 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Nov 29, 2006

Relying on Perez v. … Lee v. State of Washington, et al.

Littell v. State Ex Rel. State Board of Higher Education (In Re Littell)

6 B.R. 85 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Aug 21, 1980

National Credit Union Administration Board v. Zovkic (In re Zovkic)

564 B.R. 291 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2016

The cases cited by the Board to excuse it from proving that it relied on any representation made by the debtor do not support its position under the facts of this case. For example, in Yarbrow v. … The Board did not, therefore, prove this claim under § 523(a)(2)(A). V. The § 523(a)(2)(B) Claim St.

Pesak v. Weitzel (In Re Weitzel)

72 B.R. 253 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 24, 1987

See Brown v. … In Brown v.

Johnson v. Lewis Cass Intermediate School District (In Re Johnson)

345 B.R. 816 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · Jul 14, 2006

See Browning Mfg. v. Mims (In re Coastal Plains, Inc.), 179 F.3d 197, 207-08 (5th Cir.1999). … Eubanks v. CBSK Fin. Group, Inc., 385 F.3d 894, 898 (6th Cir.2004); Browning, 283 F.3d at 775 .

Brown

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · Aug 6, 2026

Brown cites is Levin v. Carlton (In re Carlton), No. 15-01099, 2017 WL 192954 (B.A.P. 10th Cir. Jan. 18, 2017). … See Evans v. Adams, 714 F. Supp. 3d 119, 124 n.6 (E.D.N.Y. 2024). Mr. Brown cites to Carver v.

In Re Washington Manufacturing Co.

120 B.R. 918 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · Oct 19, 1990

BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. … See, Quattrone Accountants, Inc. v. IRS, 895 F.2d 921, 925 (3rd Cir.1990); City Vending of Muskogee, Inc. v.

Ellenberg v. Board of Regents (In Re Midland Mechanical Contractors, Inc.)

194 B.R. 690 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · Apr 16, 1996

Davis v. … Services v.

Bleichner Bonta Martinez & Brown, Inc. v. National Bank of Georgia (In Re Micro Mart, Inc.)

72 B.R. 63 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · Mar 12, 1987

In the case of Browning v. … The Court concurs with the holding in Paul v. Chemical Bank (In re Associates), 57 B.R. 8 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1985) in which § 1334(c) was found to be inapplicable to removed cases.

Still v. Fundsnet, Inc. (In Re Southwest Equipment Rental)

152 B.R. 207 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 23, 1992

Royal Indemnity Co. v. American Bond & Mortgage Co., 289 U.S. 165, 171 , 53 S.Ct. 551, 554 , 77 L.Ed. 1100 (1933). The Supreme Court’s later decision in Price v. Gurney did not change this rule. Price v. … Judge Brown’s decision in In re Memphis-Friday’s Associates does not disagree with the general rule.

In Re Abdul Muhaimin

343 B.R. 159 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Apr 25, 2006

Williams v. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 15 F.3d 46, 49 (4th Cir.1994), quoting United States v. Blackwell, 946 F.2d 1049, 1052 (4th Cir.1991). … Williams v. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, 15 F.3d at 49 . The word “and” is ordinarily accepted for its conjunctive connotation. Id.; Hillman v.