Case law

Robb v. National Tree Co. (In Re Robb)

399 B.R. 171 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. West Virginia · Dec 22, 2008

Finley v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Town & Country Sales & Serv., Inc.

In Re Osyka Corp.

426 B.R. 653 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Mar 18, 2010

(“Browning”), its largest unsecured creditor. … See Kane v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins.

In Re Crofford

286 B.R. 366 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · Nov 15, 2002

See In re Brown, 152 B.R. 563, 567 (Bankr.E.D.Ark.1993) (citing Harlan v. Lewis, 982 F.2d 1255 (8th Cir.1993) and Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Case (In re Case), 937 F.2d 1014, 1023 (5th Cir.1991)). … See In re Brown, 152 B.R. at 567 (citing Crookham v. Crookham, 914 F.2d 1027, 1029 (8th Cir.1990)).

McVay v. Phouminh (In Re Phouminh)

339 B.R. 231 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · Jul 25, 2005

Gull ickson v. Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1295 (10th Cir.1997) (citing In re Folger, 149 B.R. 183, 188 (D.Kan.1992)); Cadle Co. v. Stewart (In re Stewart), 263 B.R. 608, 615 (10th Cir. BAP 2001). … In Gullickson v. Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290 (10th Cir.1997), the Tenth Circuit reversed the district court’s affirmance of a bankruptcy court denial of discharge under § 727(a)(4)(A).

Martel v. LVNV Funding, LLC (In re Martel)

539 B.R. 192 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Oct 13, 2015

Brown v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc., (In re Brown), AP No. 15-40021-JJR, 2015 WL 5735190 (Bankr.N.D.Ala. Sept. 29, 2015). . 32 M.R.S.A. § 11013(1). . 32 M.R.S.A. § 11013(1). . … Simon v.

In Re Bernick

440 B.R. 449 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Sep 7, 2010

Co., LLC v. Mullins (In re Mullins), 360 B.R. 493, 498 (Bankr.W.D.Va.2007). This is a factual question. However, the court may take judicial notice of the debtor’s schedules. Brown & Co. Sec. Corp. v. … Co., LLC v. Mullins, 360 B.R. at 498 ; see also Darby Bank & Trust v. Grenchik (In re Grenchik), 386 B.R. 915, 917-918 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.2007) and cases cited therein.

Kondapalli v. DeMasi (In re DeMasi)

522 B.R. 696 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 9, 2014

The State Court Judgment is entitled to preclusive (collateral estop-pel) effect and full faith and credit In Brown v. … Brown, 442 U.S. at 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 ; see also Grogan v.

In Re Mahoney

80 B.R. 197 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · Dec 1, 1987

California corporations law violation: Article V, para. 5.1.A of the debtor’s plan of reorganization provides that the board of D.L.M., Inc., ... [Sjhall consist of .three members. … Article V, para. 5.1.B of the debtor’s plan provides the following terms for the directors of D.L.M., Inc.: The debtor shall serve a five-year term as a member of the Board of Directors.

In Re Chattanooga Choo-Choo Co.

98 B.R. 792 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 5, 1989

It shows the banks as the board’s assignee. … See also Cummings, Inc. v. Beardsley, 271 Ark. 596 , 609 S.W.2d 66 , 30 UCC Rep. 1133 (1980) (gigantic billboard a fixture); Trans-Nebraska Corp. v.

Winter v. Hirsch (In Re Hirsch)

101 B.R. 364 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · May 5, 1989

In the leading case defining defalcation, Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); In re Held, 734 F.2d 628 (11th Cir.1984).

Planavsky v. County of Broome (In Re Planavsky)

432 B.R. 481 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · May 11, 2010

Houbigant, Inc. v. Dev. … Gonzalez, he relied on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys. v.

Allen-Bradley Co. v. Commodore Business MacHines, Inc. (In Re Commodore Business MacHines, Inc.)

180 B.R. 72 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Apr 11, 1995

of Claims (the "Board”). … Accordingly, the issues before the court were (1) whether the Board had jurisdiction over Winn’s statement of claim; (2) whether sovereign immunity barred the claim; and (3) whether the claim was barred by the Board’s six

Vision W., Inc. v. Catalan (In re Catalan)

590 B.R. 678 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 2018

Brown v. Felsen , 442 U.S. 127 , 138, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). The Supreme Court applied this principle to look past the form of a stipulated judgment in Brown and a settlement agreement in Archer . … Vision West does not rely on a novation theory, the likes of which failed in Archer and Brown .

In re Gilbert

472 B.R. 126 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · Feb 27, 2012

Ass’n v. Ferreira (In re Ferreira), 223 B.R. 258, 261-62 (D.R.I.1998). … Brown, CHAPTER 13 BANKRUPTCY, 4tH EDITION, § 140.1, at ¶24, Sec Rev. June 2, 2004, www.Chl3online.com. (citing to Brown v. Shorewood Fin. Inc. (In re Brown), 175 B.R. 129 (Bankr.D.Mass.1994)).

Still v. Hudson (In Re Hudson)

28 B.R. 876 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 6, 1983

Hudson’s mother testified about the actions of the board of directors. The board did not agree to lend Hudson the money. … Field v. Lew, 184 F.Supp. 23 (E.D.N.Y.1960). See also L.R. Schmaus Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 406 F.2d 1044 (7th Cir.1969).

Hebbard v. Camacho (In Re Camacho)

411 B.R. 496 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · May 14, 2009

See Brown v. … In Brown v.

Angel v. Tauch (In re Chiron Equities, LLC)

552 B.R. 674 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Jul 1, 2016

Until the particulars of a Board are agreed to by Walt, Eric, Jay, AND Kyle, Kyle will have full control as if he were the Board of Directors. … Hoggett v. Brown, 971 S.W.2d 472, 488 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, pet. denied) (citing Raspar v. Thorne, 755 S.W.2d 151, 155 (Tex.App.

In Re Perry

353 B.R. 18 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 30, 2006

In Sweeney v. … Bondsville Partners, Inc., No. 300634, 2006 WL 2237667 at *5 (citing Suburban Land Co., Inc. v. Brown, 237 Mass. 166, 168 , 129 N.E. 291 (1921)).

In Re Tube Methods, Inc.

73 B.R. 974 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 1987

In making this argument, the claimants fail to consider the “elementary principle of corporation law that the declaration of dividends out of net profits rests in the discretion of the board of directors.” Knapp v. … Jones v. Costlow, 349 Pa. 136 , 36 A.2d 460, 463-64 (1944). Judicial review of the exercise of a board of directors’ decision regarding the issuance of dividends is subject to the business judgment rule. See Kroese v.

Matter of Dibbern

61 B.R. 730 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · Apr 30, 1986

See Huston v. Canfield, 57 Neb. 345 , 77 N.W. 763 . … See Cressman v. Bonham, 129 Neb. 201 , 260 N.W. 818 .