Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

10,000+ results

4.14s

  • Matter of Mahan & Rowsey, Inc.

    27 B.R. 883 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1983

    They rely primarily on Joe Brown Company v. Best, 601 P.2d 755 (Okl.App.1979); Gaddis-Walker Electric Co., Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 526 P.2d 964 (Okl.App.1974); and Forry v. … Accord, Joe Brown Company, Inc. v. Best, 601 P.2d 755 (Okl.App.1979); Gaddis-Wallker Electric Co., Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company, 526 P.2d 964 (Okl.App.1974).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Homeway Rentals v. Martin (In Re Martin)

    64 B.R. 1 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · Mar 15, 1984

    Debtor’s attorney relies heavily on the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion in Clark v. … The Federal Reserve Board’s treatment of these terminable consumer leases has been unwaivering in its consistency. The Board holds that these terminable consumer leases are not covered by the Truth-in-Lending Act.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In re Cambridge Analytica LLC

    596 B.R. 1 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jan 7, 2019

    See also Johnson v. U.S. Dep't of Educ. (In re Johnson) , 2018 WL 2670469 , at *21 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. … Goldberg v. Weichert (In re Timberline Energy, Inc.) , 70 B.R. 450 , 453 (Bankr.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • O'Connell v. Three Park Avenue Building Co. (In Re Blutrich Herman & Miller)

    227 B.R. 53 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Nov 16, 1998

    Herman, Robert Miller and Steven Brown. See (Objections, ¶ 3 & 4 [“Main Case “MC” Document 5”]). … See Stich v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Barber v. Knox County School Employees Credit Union (In Re Cox)

    114 B.R. 165 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · May 16, 1990

    OPINION WILLIAM V. ALTENBERGER, Bankruptcy Judge. … The Board may allow a greater tolerance to simplify compliance where irregular payments are involved. 15 U.S.C. Section 1606 (c).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Vista Manufactured Home Community, L.P. v. Rodriguez (In re Rodriguez)

    525 B.R. 485 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · Feb 4, 2015

    See Hill v. … .”); Brown v. Brown (In re Brown), 2013 WL 5376541 , *3 (Bankr. D.N.M.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Howkins v. Butler (In Re Butler)

    86 B.R. 829 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · May 25, 1988

    In Brown v. … However, as the Third Circuit Court of Appeals pointed out in In re Ross, 602 F.2d 604, 607-08 (3d Cir.1979), Brown v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cope v. Cope (In Re Cope)

    35 B.R. 287 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · Dec 9, 1983

    Pepper v. Litton, 308 U.S. 295 , 60 S.Ct. 238 , 84 L.Ed. 281 (1939); Boynton v. Ball, 121 U.S. 457 , 7 S.Ct. 981 , 30 L.Ed. 985 (1887); Hylek v. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); In re Gross, 654 F.2d 602 (9th Cir.1981); Spilman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re American Plumbing & Mechanical, Inc.

    323 B.R. 442 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · Feb 3, 2005

    Fund v. … See Wolf v. Weinstein, 372 U.S. 633, 642-45, 649 , 83 S.Ct 969, 975-77, 979 , 10 L.Ed.2d 33 (1963); Pepper v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Banks

    577 B.R. 659 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Aug 31, 2017

    Va. 2011) (stating the same) (quoting In re Baum, 15 B.R. at 541 ); Brown v. Town & Country Sales and Serv., Inc. (In re Brown), 237 B.R. 316, 319-20 (Bankr. E.D. … In re Brown, 237 B.R. at 320-21 . Some courts articulate the standard as a “reckless or callous disregard for the law or rights of others.” Goichman v. Bloom (In re Bloom), 875 F.2d 224, 228 (9th Cir. 1989).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In Re Coleman

    373 B.R. 907 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Aug 2, 2007

    In Cheatham, I concluded that, in keeping with the Supreme Court’s directive in Associates Commercial Corp. v. … W.D.Mo.2001) (citing Raleigh v. Illinois Dept, of Revenue, 530 U.S. 15 , 120 S.Ct. 1951 , 147 L.Ed.2d 13 (2000); Brown v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Deangelis v. KC'S Pub, LLC (In Re KC'S Pub, LLC)

    428 B.R. 612 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 2010

    Co. v. Union Planters Bank, N.A., 530 U.S. 1, 6 , 120 S.Ct. 1942 , 147 L.Ed.2d 1 (2000); Lamie v. U.S. Trustee, 540 U.S. 526, 534 , 124 S.Ct. 1023 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1024 (2004). … Detwiler v. Brumbaugh, 441 Pa.Super. 110 , 656 A.2d 944, 946 (1995). Further, evidence of visible intoxication may be presented by eyewitness testimony or by circumstantial evidence. Fandozzi v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Goody's Family Clothing, Inc.

    401 B.R. 131 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Feb 6, 2009

    In re Brown & Cole Stores, LLC, 375 B.R. 873 , 878 n. 7 (9th Cir.BAP2007). 6 . United States v. Ron Pair Enters., 489 U.S. 235, 241 , 109 S.Ct. 1026 , 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989). 7 . 11 U.S.C. § 503 (b)(9). 8 . Dewsnup v. … See, e.g., BMC Indus., Inc. v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • In Re Houck

    180 B.R. 186 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 22, 1995

    Local Loan Co. v. Hunt, 292 U.S. 234, 244 , 54 S.Ct. 695, 699 , 78 L.Ed. 1230 (1934). … The Brown case had another similarity to that before us, in that there the debtor also had conducted his affairs on a cash basis.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Brown

    310 B.R. 341 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 15, 2004

    Tustin Thrift & Loan Ass’n v. Maldonado (In re Maldonado), 228 B.R. 735, 739 (9th Cir. BAP 1999). As was explained in Gable v. Educational Credit Management Corp. … As the [Supreme Court in Bruning v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Adams (In re Adams)

    478 B.R. 476 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · Jul 19, 2012

    Defendant made false and malicious statements — intended to damage Plaintiffs reputation — to members of the Board of Directors of Home Savings (“Home Savings Board”); to the Advisory Director of Home Savings; and to other … See, e.g., Cantu v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Hudson Valley Water Resources, Inc. v. Boice (In Re Boice)

    149 B.R. 40 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Dec 17, 1992

    Brown (In re Brown), 55 B.R. 999, 1003 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1986) (“The courts have differentiated between a materially false and incorrect or erroneous statement relating to a person’s financial condition.”); Collier 11523.09, … See, e.g., Management Jets Int’l Inc. v. Mutschler, 45 B.R. at 491 ; Municipal Credit Union v. Brown, 55 B.R. at 1004 (“[I]t is virtually impossible to obtain direct proof of one’s intent....”); Citibank (S.D.),N.A.

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • In Re Circuit City Stores, Inc.

    432 B.R. 225 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Apr 8, 2010

    Circuit City Stores, 416 B.R. 531, 536 (Bankr.E.D.Va.2009); see also Brown & Cole Stores, LLC v. Associated Grocers, Inc. (In re Brown & Cole Stores, LLC), 375 B.R. 873 (9th Cir. … See, e.g., U.S. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In re Hocum

    119 B.R. 723 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · Oct 4, 1990

    Brown, 56 B.R. at 958 . … Hull v. Powell, 309 F.2d 3, 6 (9th Cir.1962). A creditor’s inability to participate in a no-asset bankruptcy case is not prejudice. Hawkins, 727 F.2d at 327 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Specialty Plastics, Inc. v. Doemling (In Re Specialty Plastics, Inc.)

    113 B.R. 915 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · May 3, 1990

    In addition, there is no indication that these purported loans were ever approved by Specialty’s board of directors. … The minutes of meetings of Specialty’s board of directors contain no reference to any loans from Doemling to Specialty.

    Vacated in part, on other grounds by Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Specialty Plastic v. Doemling, 127 B.R. 945 (1991)Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.