Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

7,439 results

0.65s

  • Blacksmith Investments, LLC v. Woodford (In Re Woodford)

    403 B.R. 177 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 14, 2009

    statement that the annuity was ERISA-qualified. … Laws ch. 235, § 34A, 5 he argues that his annuity is ERISA-qualified and further that an ERISA-qualified annuity is not property of the bankruptcy estate.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In Re Montanaro

    398 B.R. 688 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Dec 10, 2008

    exemption in such person’s right to receive: (f) Any money or assets, payable to a participant or beneficiary from, of any interest of any participant or beneficiary in, a retirement plan or profit-sharing plan that is qualified … property that the debtor converted into the homestead within ten years of filing for bankruptcy, if the conversion was made “with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a creditor.” 6 In deciding that the bankruptcy court clearly

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Chao v. Lexington Healthcare Group, Inc. (In Re Lexington Healthcare Group, Inc.)

    335 B.R. 570 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Dec 15, 2005

    If the employer does not pay the gross wages to the employees (or to the plan as directed by the employees), then clearly some portion of the employees’ wages have been “withheld.” … The facts in Begier suggest what may qualify as a nexus. In that case, the funds had actually been paid to the IRS to satisfy the debtor’s trust fund obligation. Id. at 56 , 110 S.Ct. 2258 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Racca

    40 B.R. 622 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · Apr 19, 1984

    Racca has clearly failed to do. Mr. Racca’s testimony regarding the details of his shrimping operation can be characterized, at best, as sketchy and unsatisfactory. … The state of Louisiana expressly waives any immunity from suit insofar as the garnishment of the nonexempt portion of the wages, salaries, commissions, or other compensation of public officials, whether elected or appointed

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Gambale

    2014 BNH 7 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · Jun 19, 2014

    Laureyns as “these payments were clearly not for child support; they were for expenses the [Debtor] already had a legal obligation to pay.” … Heat and hot water are necessities that clearly contribute to the well-being of one’s family. See Keeran v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In Re Reak

    92 B.R. 804 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Sep 30, 1988

    The payment of estate taxes is clearly ‘inescapably interwoven’ with the farming operation.” Id. at 537 . … In the same vein, in Matter of Rinker, 75 B.R. 65 (Bankr.S.D.Iowa 1987), an obligation arising out of a will settlement was held to be farm-related, thereby qualifying the debtor for chapter 12 relief.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • In re Angelo

    480 B.R. 70 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 27, 2012

    Robinson contends that the Award qualifies because it is in the nature support. Angelo contends that no part of the Award is support. … For these reasons, the second requirement for judicial estoppel is established.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Grillo v. Corigliano (In Re Grillo)

    331 B.R. 614 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 7, 2005

    The test to establish liability under section 6672 can be reduced to two elements: “(1) the individual must be a ‘responsible person,’ and (2) his or her failure to pay the tax must be ‘willful.’ ” United States v. … Simply put, the reckless disregard standard is satisfied where the party “ ‘(1) clearly ought to have known that (2) there was a grave risk that withholding taxes were not being paid and if (3) he was in a position to find

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vescovo v. First State Bank (In Re Vescovo)

    125 B.R. 468 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · Nov 8, 1990

    Clearly, subparts (A) and (B) do not apply to this situation. Sub-part (C) may apply if Mr. … The Cash Deposit was clearly placed with Mr. Dixon for the benefit of and to adequately protect the Defendant.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • DeRosa v. Boston Bakery & Italian Food Specialty, Inc. (In Re DeRosa)

    103 B.R. 382 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · Sep 8, 1989

    Given the effect of these statements and promises on the conduct of the DeRo-sas, that is, their decision to enter into the franchise agreement, they are also clearly material. … On Franchisee’s request, the personal assistance and counsel of a qualified representative of Franchisor. 7 .Section Six entitled "Food Products to be Sold” provides that "[a] full line of products identified with Franchisor

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • O'Neil v. Fleet National Bank (In Re Britton)

    300 B.R. 155 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Oct 3, 2003

    Neither party directly discusses in their mem-oranda whether the debtor’s interest in the trust remainder qualifies as property of the estate. … is enforceable in a case under this title. 3 .Although the plaintiff argues that the motion is untimely pursuant to the June 17, 2003 Scheduling Order, the court finds this argument without merit as the Scheduling Order clearly

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Threet (In Re Threet)

    118 B.R. 805 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 28, 1990

    The legislative history of this section clearly establishes Congressional intent that the bankruptcy estate be as all-encompassing as the language indicates. The scope of the paragraph is broad. … This is a legal right which clearly becomes part of the Debtor’s estate.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In Re Symes

    174 B.R. 114 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · Oct 20, 1994

    To qualify for installment payments, there must not have been either previous payments or property transfers to an attorney for bankruptcy services. Supra. The rule’s prohibition is straightforward. … Clearly, debtors could reaffirm these fee agreements. Given the special attorney-client relationship, however, such a reaffirmation would require detailed notice and disclosure.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • In Re Board of Directors of Hopewell International Insurance

    238 B.R. 25 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Aug 19, 1999

    As a result, the court held the Zambian voluntary winding-up qualified as a foreign proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code. … Judge Cristol likened the petitioners in Kingscroft to debtors in possession and qualified them as foreign representatives. See id.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • EBS Pension L.L.C. v. Edison Bros. Stores, Inc. (In Re Edison Bros.)

    243 B.R. 231 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Jan 7, 2000

    The excess proceeds were defined in the First Edison Plan as all rights which Edison had to the funds in the terminated pension plan net of the funds transferred to a new qualified pension plan and related costs and taxes … associated with the termination of the old pension plan and establishment of the new pension plan.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hodge (In Re Hodge)

    216 B.R. 932 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 4, 1998

    Upon a review of the record and the findings made by the Court in the District Court Action, this Court finds that the final judgment in the District Court Action establishes actual fraud for the purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 523 … Clearly, in a case where the issue of fraud was fully litigated, as occurred in the District Court Action, collateral estoppel is appropriate.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Matter of Hamlin's Landing Joint Venture

    77 B.R. 916 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Sep 8, 1987

    This being the case, it is clear that the rents and profits derived from the, operation of the project do not qualify to be “cash collateral” simply because before “cash collateral” comes into play there must be cash or the … However, despite these fundamental principles of banking law, § 363 of the Bankruptcy Code clearly provides that “deposit accounts,” which would include a general operating account, constitute cash collateral.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Gargula v. Miller (In re Bowyer)

    489 B.R. 798 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · Mar 4, 2013

    The conduct of Dennis Miller and Richard Kuhns toward each debtor has been clearly described, and it comports with the definition of a BPP. … Trustee established (without objection by the defendants) that in Mr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Whitemere Development Corp.

    65 B.R. 734 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 23, 1986

    Clearly, prior court approval of professional employment on behalf of a trustee or debtor-in-possession is desirable to maintain court supervision and control of the estate. … It is important to address the reference in the Triangle Chemicals case to the need to establish “exceptional circumstances”. I believe that the reference is tempered by a close review of the case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re McCartney

    336 B.R. 588 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · Jan 12, 2006

    For example, a debt relief agency must, in an advertisement directed to the general public, disclose clearly and conspicuously that the assistance provided may involve filing for bankruptcy relief. 11 U.S.C.A. 528(b)(2). … Second, the plaintiff must establish a casual link between the injury and the challenged conduct. Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560 , 112 S.Ct. 2130 , 119 L.Ed.2d 351 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.