Case law

County of Dakota v. Milan (In re Milan)

546 B.R. 187 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · Mar 1, 2016

. § 641.12. 13 Kelly v. Robinson In Kelly v. … U.S. v.

Texas Gulf Trawling Co. v. RCA Trawlers & Supply, Inc. (In Re Ciclon Negro, Inc.)

260 B.R. 832 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Apr 3, 2001

. *835 1996); Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069,1076-77 (5th Cir.1984). … See In re Hofmann, 248 B.R. at 94 ; Browning, 743 F.2d at 1076 n. 21.

Nash v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Nash)

228 B.R. 669 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 28, 1999

See Spears v. … Kouba v. East Joliet Bank, 136 Ill.App.3d 264, 268 , 89 Ill.Dec. 774 , 481 N.E.2d 325, 329 (3d Dist.1985).

In Re Donaldson Ford, Inc.

19 B.R. 425 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 13, 1982

Jordan v. … Zeitinger v.

In Re UVAS Farming Corp.

91 B.R. 575 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · Sep 8, 1988

Manufacturers Trust Co., Trustees v. Becker, 338 U.S. 304, 314 , 70 S.Ct. 127, 133 , 94 L.Ed. 107 (1949). … Monroe v. Scofield, 135 F.2d 725, 728 (10th Cir.1943).

In re Bratt

527 B.R. 303 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 26, 2015

That 6% penalty still applies across the board pursuant to subsection (a). … Bank v. Garner (In re Garner), 663 F.3d 1218, 1220 (11th Cir.2011)). See also Keith M. Lundin & William H. Brown, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, 4th Edition, § 116.1, at ¶ [8], Sec. Rev.

Visiting Nurse Ass'n of Tampa Bay v. Sullivan (In Re Visiting Nurse Ass'n of Tampa Bay)

121 B.R. 114 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Oct 30, 1990

This Board has the power to affirm, modify, or reverse the Fiscal Intermediary’s decision. … A decision of the Board is final unless the Secretary reverses, affirms, or modifies the decision within sixty days of the Provider receiving notice of the Board’s decision.

In Re Gardner

118 B.R. 860 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 3, 1990

Co. v. … Congress no doubt had the opportunity, if it desired to do so, to exempt or provide across-the-board exemptions for funds in ERISA plans and failed to do so.

In Re a & D Care, Inc.

90 B.R. 138 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 6, 1988

See Harley Hotel, supra at 780, quoting Macon Prestressed Concrete Co. v. … The parties agree that said bond was not posted; however, Debtor asserts it was granted a delay by the previous Board of County Commissioners.

De La Cruz v. Cohen (In Re Cohen)

185 B.R. 180 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 19, 1995

First, the Debtor argues that the overpayment calculation previously determined by the Hoboken Rent Leveling Board (the “Board”) was in error. … Welfare v.

Dean v. Protho Express, Inc. (In Re Protho Express, Inc.)

130 B.R. 517 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · Aug 15, 1991

Price v. Gurney, 324 U.S. 100, 106-07 , 65 S.Ct. 513, 516-17 , 89 L.Ed. 776 (1945). … See, e.g., Hickory Point Ind., Inc. v. Hickory Holding Corp.

Fidler v. Central Cooperative Bank (In Re Fidler)

210 B.R. 411 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 1997

See, e.g., Smith v. … To implement TILA, Congress "delegated expansive authority to the Federal Reserve Board to elaborate and expand the legal framework governing commerce in credit.” Ford Motor Credit Co. v.

NHB Assignments LLC Ex Rel. Liquidating Trust v. General Atlantic LLC (In Re PMTS Liquidating Corp.)

452 B.R. 498 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Jul 1, 2011

Carino v. Stefan, 376 F.3d 156, 159 (3d Cir.2004); See also Phillips v. … The record further reflects that there were at least four non-GA affiliated board members, and at least one other substantial shareholder with a seat on ProxyMed’s board.

Havenstein v. Freeman (In Re Freeman)

142 B.R. 758 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Jun 12, 1991

Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). See also Spilman v. Harley, 656 F.2d 224, 227 (6th Cir.1981). Therefore, res judicata is inapplicable to this proceeding. … In Brown v.

Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. Sterling (In re Sterling)

479 B.R. 444 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 6, 2012

Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Vitanovich (In re Vitanovich), 259 B.R. 873, 877 (6th Cir. BAP 2001); JGR Assocs., LLC v. Brown (In re Brown), 442 B.R. 585, 600 (Bankr.E.D.Mich.2011); Morganroth & Morganroth, PLLC v. … Brown, 442 B.R. at 600 (citing Field v. Mans, 516 U.S. 59, 69 , 116 S.Ct. 437 , 133 L.Ed.2d 351 (1995)). Plaintiff has the burden of proving actual fraud by a preponderance of the evidence. Grogan v.

Burns v. Burns (In Re Burns)

186 B.R. 637 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · Jun 15, 1992

Cooley v. Sposa (In re Sposa), 31 B.R. 307 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1983). See Pauley v. Spong, 661 F.2d 6 (2nd Cir.1981); Brodsky, Greenblatt, & Renehan, Chartered v. Daumit (In re Daumit), 25 B.R. 371 (Bankr.D.Md.1982); Brown v. … Brown (In re Brown), Case No. 81-00585, Complaint No. 81-0268 (Bankr.D.S.C. 8/31/82); Westmoreland, Patterson, and Moseley v. Painter (In re Painter), 21 B.R. 846 (Bankr.M.D.Ga.1982).

Fjord v. AMR Corp. (In re AMR Corp.)

502 B.R. 23 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Nov 27, 2013

Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 ; see also Chapman v. New York State Div. for Youth, 546 F.3d 230, 237-38 (2d Cir.2008). … Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 321-22 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 .

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. California Public Utilities Commission (In Re Pacific Gas & Electric Co.)

263 B.R. 306 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 2001

Gruntz v. County of Los Angeles (In re Gruntz), 202 F.3d 1074, 1087 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc ). See also National Labor Relations Board v. … Co. of New Hampshire), 98 B.R. 120, 124 (Bankr.D.N.H.1989) (same); LTV Steel Co. v. Board of Educ. (In re Chateaugay Corp.), 93 B.R. 26, 29 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (“irreparable injury” element); Garrity v.

In Re Richmond Unified School District

133 B.R. 221 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · Nov 5, 1991

At least one member of the school board also opposed the motion. … Compare Ashton v. Cameron County Water Improvement District No. One, 298 U.S. 513 , 56 S.Ct. 892 , 80 L.Ed. 1309 (1936) and United States v.

In Re Overland Park Financial Corp.

217 B.R. 879 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · Feb 5, 1998

One of the best known cases in the bankruptcy field, Butner v. … See Kaneb Servs., Inc. v. Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corp., 650 F.2d 78 (5th Cir.1981) 46 The citation to Kaneb Sens., Inc. v. Federal Savings & Loan Ins.