Case law

In Re Ellington

151 B.R. 90 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · Jan 29, 1993

See Joleewu, Ltd. v. … Certain of the equipment from Brown’s Coldstorage Warehouse have not yet been foreclosed upon and sold.

Saslow v. Michael (In Re Michael)

452 B.R. 908 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 15, 2011

Crossroad Sports, Inc. was a company that sold skateboarding and snow boarding equipment and accessories. It was formed in 1998 and did business under the trade name of Board Paradise. … Id.; see also Groman v. Watman (In re Watman), 301 F.3d 3, 7 (1st Cir.2002); Vill. of San Jose v. McWilliams, 284 F.3d 785, 791 (7th Cir.2002); CM Partnership v.

In Re Alvarez

458 B.R. 645 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · Sep 9, 2011

.”); Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co. v. … Congress' express intent of overruling Rake v.

In Re Balanced Plan, Inc.

257 B.R. 921 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Jan 31, 2001

See also Willard v. … See Brown v. Internal Revenue Serv. (In re Brown), 82 F.3d 801, 805-06 (8th Cir.1996); Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 86 F.Supp.2d 921, 924 (E.D.Mo.2000).

In re Hendrix

179 B.R. 519 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Kentucky · Dec 28, 1994

Knox v. Great West Life Assur. Co., 212 F.2d 784, 785 (6th Cir.1954); U.S. v. Ott, 166 F.Supp. 13, 18 (E.D.Mich.1958); Matter of Beard, 112 B.R. 951, 954 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.1990). 115 B.R. at page 656 . The court in Knox v. … Brown, 73 B.R. 740 , 16 B.C.D. 5 (W.D.Wis.1987), reported in Bankruptcy Reporter as Matter of Brown, 73 B.R. 740 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Wis.1987), and In re Duncan, 60 B.R. 345 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Ala.1986) are Chapter 7 cases and their discussions

Dominion Bankshares Services v. Shrader (In Re Shrader)

55 B.R. 608 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · Dec 5, 1985

Gleason v. Thaw, supra. … See also Brown v. Buchanan, 419 F.Supp. 199, 202 (E.D.VA 1975); Sweet v. Ritter Finance Co., supra, at 540.

In re Joan Fabrics Corp.

508 B.R. 881 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · May 5, 2014

State v. Fenner, 263 N.C. 694, 697-98 , 140 S.E.2d 349 (1965). . See United States v. Sec. Mgmt. … See also United States v. Brown, 536 F.2d 117, 122 (6th Cir.1976); United States v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 727 F.3d 274, 293 (3d Cir.2013). . N.C.

Plural Realty Inc. v. Bende (In Re Bende)

152 B.R. 677 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · Mar 9, 1993

American Rieter Company, Inc. v. Dinallo et al., supra. … It also includes the use of the easement conveyed by the Board of Education to the Debtor even though the Center property is not contiguous to land of said Board. 25 Am Jur.2d § 11; Tide-Water Pipe Co. v.

In Re Donaldson Ford, Inc.

19 B.R. 425 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 13, 1982

Jordan v. … Zeitinger v.

In re Bratt

527 B.R. 303 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 26, 2015

That 6% penalty still applies across the board pursuant to subsection (a). … Bank v. Garner (In re Garner), 663 F.3d 1218, 1220 (11th Cir.2011)). See also Keith M. Lundin & William H. Brown, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, 4th Edition, § 116.1, at ¶ [8], Sec. Rev.

Carter v. Verhelst (In Re Verhelst)

170 B.R. 657 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · Aug 23, 1993

Verhelst further testified that he did not have a bulletin board in office, and that he did not know what Carter was talking about when he said that notices were posted on a bulletin board. … He stated that there was a chalk board on which would be written work instructions, but that no notices were posted on this chalk board.

In Re Gardner

118 B.R. 860 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Aug 3, 1990

Co. v. … Congress no doubt had the opportunity, if it desired to do so, to exempt or provide across-the-board exemptions for funds in ERISA plans and failed to do so.

In Re a & D Care, Inc.

90 B.R. 138 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 6, 1988

See Harley Hotel, supra at 780, quoting Macon Prestressed Concrete Co. v. … The parties agree that said bond was not posted; however, Debtor asserts it was granted a delay by the previous Board of County Commissioners.

In Re Norwood

178 B.R. 683 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1995

Exhibit P-6 (Appeals Board Decision at pp. 1-2, and Dismissal Letter of October 14, 1987). Debtor did not defend against the District Court action. … Nuefeld, supra, 794 F.2d at 152-53 ; see also Noreen v.

Hunter v. Babcock (In Re Babcock Dairy Co. of Ohio)

70 B.R. 685 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 9, 1986

Hunter v. Pool Pals Manufacturing, Inc., supra. Rather, an insider may be any person or entity whose relationship with the debtor is sufficiently close so as to subject the relationship to careful scrutiny. Lingley v. … Although the Trustee has argued that the decision in Loftis v.

Nash v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Nash)

228 B.R. 669 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 28, 1999

See Spears v. … Kouba v. East Joliet Bank, 136 Ill.App.3d 264, 268 , 89 Ill.Dec. 774 , 481 N.E.2d 325, 329 (3d Dist.1985).

Holtorf v. Illinois Student Assistance Commission (In Re Holtorf)

204 B.R. 567 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · Jan 9, 1997

Albert v. Ohio Student Loan Comm’n (In re Albert), 25 B.R. 98 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1982); United States v. Brown (In re Brown), 18 B.R. 219 (Bankr.D.Kan.1982); Garmerian v. Rhode Island Higher Educ. Assistance Auth. … Brown, 18 B.R. at 222 .

In re World Imports

516 B.R. 296 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2014

Co., Ltd. v. Momenta, Inc. (In re Momenta, Inc.), 11-cv-479, 2012 WL 3765171 , at *4 (D.N.H. Aug. 29, 2012). … That is why the Court previously determined that receipt of the goods occurred in China when they were placed on board.

Fidler v. Central Cooperative Bank (In Re Fidler)

210 B.R. 411 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 1997

See, e.g., Smith v. … To implement TILA, Congress "delegated expansive authority to the Federal Reserve Board to elaborate and expand the legal framework governing commerce in credit.” Ford Motor Credit Co. v.

NHB Assignments LLC Ex Rel. Liquidating Trust v. General Atlantic LLC (In Re PMTS Liquidating Corp.)

452 B.R. 498 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Jul 1, 2011

Carino v. Stefan, 376 F.3d 156, 159 (3d Cir.2004); See also Phillips v. … The record further reflects that there were at least four non-GA affiliated board members, and at least one other substantial shareholder with a seat on ProxyMed’s board.