Case law

Theobald Industries, Inc. v. Local 786, International Chemical Workers Union (In Re Theobald Industries, Inc.)

16 B.R. 537 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 11, 1981

The issue here is essentially jurisdictional, specifically whether an unfair labor practice *538 procedure before the National Labor Relations Board (N.L.R.B.) is subject to the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362 … This Court notes that a contrary result was reached by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in National Labor Relations Board v. Evans Plumbing Co., 639 F.2d 291 (5th *540 Cir. 1981) (per curiam).

Johnson v. Kramer (In Re Kramer)

71 B.R. 2 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1986

On almost identical facts, a party with a pre-petition agreement providing for the re-transfer of a liquor license in the event of default was held not entitled to relief from the automatic stay in Miller v. … R-2193, 72 Pa.Commw. 367, 456 A.2d 709 (1983); see also 1412 Spruce, Inc. v.

Deltacorp, Inc. v. Office of Thrift Supervision (In Re Deltacorp, Inc.)

111 B.R. 419 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Mar 13, 1990

See National Hospital and Institutional Builders Company v. Goldstein (In re National Hospital and Institutional Builders Company), 658 F.2d 39 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom. Goldstein v. … Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, (In re MCorp Inc.), 101 B.R. 483 (S.D.Tex.1989).

Matter of Brada Miller Freight System, Inc.

8 B.R. 62 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · Dec 22, 1980

Shopmen’s Local 455 v. Kevin Steel Products, Inc., 519 F.2d 698 , 706 (2nd Cir. 1975); Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, AFL-CIO v. … REA Express, Inc., 523 F.2d 164 (2nd Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 1017 , 1073, 96 S.Ct. 451 , 855, 46 L.Ed.2d 389 , 47 L.Ed.2d 82 , and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v.

In Re Las Vegas Monorail Co.

429 B.R. 770 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · Apr 26, 2010

Bank v. … Brown v. Smart, 145 U.S. 454 , 12 S.Ct. 958 , 36 L.Ed. 773 (1892) (Contracts Clause prohibits state insolvency law from affecting the contractual rights of the citizens of other states without their consent).

In Re Jefferson

263 B.R. 231 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Jun 5, 2001

OPINION WILLIAM V. ALTENBERGER, Bankruptcy Judge. … Notice of the hen may be recorded by the board of managers....

In Re MacHne Menachem, Inc.

371 B.R. 63 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 2006

more directors, a vote of the majority of the entire board shall be sufficient. … Cooper Distributing Co., Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 63 F.3d 262, 275 (3d Cir.1995), citing McKenna v.

Simon v. Short (In re Oakland Physicians Med. Ctr., L.L.C.)

596 B.R. 587 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · Feb 1, 2019

Notes Despite serving on the board of directors and as financial advisor on the financial subcommittee of the board, (Def.'s Ex. … Bank v.

Buena Vista Television v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)

307 B.R. 404 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Mar 30, 2004

Brown? 14. … The Reading Co. v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Black (In Re Black)

95 B.R. 819 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Jan 23, 1989

In reaching this conclusion, the Supreme Court stated: The Board is the public agent chosen by Congress to enforce the National Labor Relations Act. Amalgamated Utility Workers v. … Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 313 U.S. 177, 197 , 85 L.Ed. 1271, 1284 , 61 S.Ct. 845 [853], 133 ALR 1217 . Congress has made the Board the only party entitled to enforce the Act.

Haile Co. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (In Re Haile Co.)

132 B.R. 979 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · Oct 25, 1991

In re Cinematronics, Inc., 916 F.2d 1444 , 1451 (9th Cir.1990); Beard v. Braunstein, 914 F.2d 434, 443 (3rd Cir.1990); In re Kaiser Steel Corp., 911 F.2d 380 , 389-92 (10th Cir.1990); Macon Prestressed Concrete Co. v. … Duke, 46 B.R. 727, 730 (D.M.D.Ga.1985); Ellenberg v. Bouldin, 125 B.R. 851, 855-56 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1991); In re Bertholet v. Harman, 126 B.R. 413, 416 (Bankr.D.N.H.1991). See also Ford v.

In Re Thomson McKinnon Securities, Inc.

149 B.R. 61 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Dec 29, 1992

In Citrin v. … See Kent v.

In Re Vicknair

315 B.R. 822 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 6, 2004

Tammany school board. … See, e.g., Ellis v. Malone, 69 So.2d 625 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1953)(truck used to transport power saw, axes and fuel to logging areas); A. Wilbert’s Sons Lumber & Shingle Co. v.

Personal Finance Co. v. Kink (In Re Kink)

15 B.R. 701 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Oct 9, 1981

tweed love seat, 1 card table, 1 brown tweed chair, 1 72" brown tweed couch, 1 plant shelf, 1 queen-sized bed, boxsprings, mattress & bed frame, 1 Pearl handle 25 automatic, 1 357 Ruger 6 shot pistol ‘Security 6’, 243 Remington … Co. v.

In Re Friedman's, Inc.

336 B.R. 891 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · Apr 4, 2005

See, e.g., Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors v. Henry Mayo Newhall Mem’l Hosp. (In re Henry Newhall Mem’l Hosp.), 282 B.R. 444 (9th Cir. BAP 2002). … Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., 756 F.2d 1043, 1047 (4th Cir.1985).

In Re Hutchins

400 B.R. 403 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · Jan 30, 2009

BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge. Robert S. … (In re Brown), 226 B.R. 39 , *414 44 (W.D.Mo.1998) (quoting Kansas City Downtown Minority Dev. Corp. v. Corrigan Assoc. Ltd. P’ship, 868 S.W.2d 210, 223 (Mo.Ct.App.1994)).

In Re Farmers Co-Op of Arkansas & Oklahoma, Inc.

53 B.R. 600 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · Sep 9, 1985

Bethell and other former members of the board third party defendants for indemnity for their failure to discharge their responsibilities as members of the board of directors. … Any loss to the bank may render the board jointly and severally liable as members of the board. Bank of Commerce v. Goolsby, 129 Ark. at 423 , 196 S.W. at 810 .

In Re Inman

131 B.R. 789 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · May 15, 1991

Bank v. … DFM’s reliance on In re Brown is misplaced. The Court in Brown only determined the debtor had no standing to bring the action sought since the transaction did not qualify under any provision of § 522.

Monsour v. Monsour (In Re Monsour)

372 B.R. 272 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · Jul 19, 2007

Pueschel v. United States, 369 F.3d 345, 354-55 (4th Cir.2004) (quoting Federated Dep’t Stores, Inc. v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 398 , 101 S.Ct. 2424 , 69 L.Ed.2d 103 , (1981) and Brown v. … Brown v. Brown, 5 Va.App. 238, 246 , 361 S.E.2d 364, 368 (1987). 2 .

Fulbright v. United States Department of Education (In Re Fulbright)

319 B.R. 650 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · Jan 7, 2005

Albert v. Ohio Student Loan Comm’n (In re Albert), 25 B.R. 98 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1982); United States v. Brown (In re Brown), 18 B.R. 219 (Bankr.D.Kan.1982); Garmerian v. Rhode Island Higher Educ. Assistance Auth. … See § 1325(b)(2); see, e.g., Sequeira v. Sallie Mae Servicing Corp. (In re Sequeira), 278 B.R. 861, 865 (Bankr.D.Or.2001); Peel v. SallieMae Servicing-Heal Loan (In re Peel), 240 B.R. 387 (Bankr.N.D.Cal.1999); Brown v.