Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFB

10,000+ results

1.57s

  • In Re DeLuca Distributing Co.

    38 B.R. 588 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 30, 1984

    The debtor cites Local Joint Executive Board, AFL-CIO v. Hotel Circle, Inc., 613 F.2d 210 (9th Cir.1980) in support of its position. … One case, Local Joint Executive Board, AFL-CIO v. Hotel Circle, Inc., 613 F.2d 210 (9th Cir.1980) did address this issue under the Bankruptcy Act of 1898.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Hoskins v. Educational Credit Management Corp. (In Re Hoskins)

    292 B.R. 883 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · Apr 3, 2003

    See, Brown, supra; In re Anelli, 262 B.R. 1 (Bankr.D.Mass.2000). … Brown . In the present case, the DEBTOR testified that he has experienced epileptic seizures since he was twelve years old.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In re Council of Unit Owners of the 100 Harborview Drive Condominium

    552 B.R. 84 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · May 11, 2016

    As we pointed out in Rowland v. … See e.g., Caplin & Drysdale, Chtd. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wharton v. Shiver (In Re Shiver)

    396 B.R. 110 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Nov 5, 2008

    In the earlier case of Brown v. … Addressing in a footnote the issue left open in Brown v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • In re Haynes

    569 B.R. 733 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 20, 2017

    Reading Co. v. Brown, 391 U.S. 471, 482-84 [ 88 S.Ct. 1759 , 20 L.Ed.2d 751 ] (1968) (those injured during administration of estate by Trustee *737 entitled to priority claim as administrative expense).... Id. … The Charlesbank Laundry case determined that fairness demanded that claims resulting from these intentionally illegal acts be paid ahead of prepetition claims— and thus applied the reasoning of Reading v. Brown.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • J.P. Morgan Trust Co. National Ass'n v. Cleberg (In Re Farmland Industries, Inc.)

    335 B.R. 398 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · Nov 16, 2005

    At the Board meeting, Honse and others advised the Board that the Complex would have an initial cost of approximately $252 million. … The board left Eisner to complete the negotiations with Ovitz. 52 And the final contract — which differed significantly from the draft previously presented to the board — was signed “without any board input.” 53 Based on

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Berryman v. Smith (In Re Smith)

    84 B.R. 175 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · Mar 23, 1988

    In re Adams, Browning & Bates, Ltd., 70 B.R. 490, 496 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1987). … See also In re Adams, Browning & Bates, Ltd., 70 B.R. at 495 (stating, “[t]hat Katchen v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Maricopa County v. PMI-DVW Real Estate Holdings, L.L.P. (In Re PMI-DVW Real Estate Holdings, L.L.P.)

    240 B.R. 24 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · Aug 27, 1999

    V, XIV; Ariz. Const, art. II, § 17. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors found the proposed realignment of Deer Valley Road, and therefore the taking of Debtor’s property was a “public necessity.” … Redevelopment Agency of the City of Long Beach, California v. Altamirco (In re Altamirco), 56 B.R. 199, 200-01 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1986) (citing Hawaii Housing Auth. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In Re Moussa

    93 B.R. 96 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Sep 29, 1988

    Purdin v. Jenkins, 337 S.W.2d 418, 421 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1960, no writ). … Co., Inc. v. Brown & Root Inc., 607 S.W.2d 621, 627 (Tex.Civ. App. — Waco 1980, writ ref. n.r.e.), and that only substantial compliance with the statutory requirements is necessary to obtain a valid lien.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In re Empire State Conglomerates, Inc.

    546 B.R. 306 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Feb 24, 2016

    Dieffenbach v. Haworth (In re Haworth), 356 Fed.Appx. 529, 530 (2d Cir.2009) (quoting In re Freeport Italian Bakery, Inc., 340 F.2d 50, 54 (2d Cir.1965)); Surabian v. … Corp. v. Employee Creditors Committee (In re Momentum Mfg.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Fletcher (In re Fletcher)

    489 B.R. 224 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 18, 2013

    Mathai v. Warren (In re Warren), 512 F.3d 1241, 1249 (10th Cir.2008) (citing Gullickson v. Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1292 (10th Cir.1997)). . Id. (internal quotations and citations omitted). . … In re Brown, 108 F.3d at 1294 . . Id. at 1295 . . In re Calder, 907 F.2d at 955 (citing In re Chalik, 748 F.2d 616 (11th Cir.1984)). . See Note 38 supra. . § 727(a)(5). . Crane v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Slobodian v. Capital for Merchants, LLC (In re ABS Ventures, Inc.)

    523 B.R. 443 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 2014

    Brown v. Ameriquest Funding II, LLC (In re Brown), 431 B.R. 309, 314 (Bankr.D.Mass.2010) (citing cases). … See In re Brown, 431 B.R. at 314 -15 (quoting Holland v. EMC Mortg. Corp.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Carickhoff v. Cantor

    United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Jun 13, 2023

    Opening Brief 33-35, 66 See Anschutz Corp. v. Brown Robin Cap., LLC, No. CV 2019-0710-JRS, 2020 WL 3096744, at *17 (Del. Ch. June 11, 2020). 5? Jd. … Osborn v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc.

    175 B.R. 525 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Dec 16, 1994

    Two days later, senior management informed Leslie Fay’s board of directors (the “Board” or “Board of Directors”) which in turn disclosed the existence of the false entries to the general public. … See TWI International, Inc. v.

    Cited 95 timesPublished
  • Rodrigues v. U.S. Bank (In Re Rodrigues)

    278 B.R. 683 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · May 22, 2002

    The TILA vests the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board with broad power to promulgate regulations regarding the interpretation and implementation of the Act. See 15 U.S.C. § 1604 (a), and in Mourning v. … Regulation Z is promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, and because Congress has "specifically designated the Federal Reserve Board and staff as the primary source of interpretation and application of truth-in-lending law

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Subranni v. Remington (In Re Remington)

    14 B.R. 496 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 8, 1981

    Board of Medical Examiners, 497 F.Supp. 525, 534 (D.N.J.1980); American Trial Lawyers Association v. N.J. Supreme Court, supra. The doctrine of abstention is equitable in its origins, Hostetter v. … Brown, 260 F.Supp. 323 (E.D.Pa.1966); McKnight v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Armstrong v. Ketterling (In Re Anchorage Marina, Inc.)

    93 B.R. 686 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · Jul 20, 1988

    In exchange for his services as manager, the Anchorage board of directors (Board) agreed to pay him $24,000.00 per year. … Fitzgerald v. Davis, 729 F.2d 306, 308 (4th Cir.1984).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Manty v. Miller & Holmes, Inc. (In Re Nation-Wide Exchange Services, Inc.)

    291 B.R. 131 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · Mar 31, 2003

    Housing Auth. of the City of Poplar Bluff, 114 F.3d 693, 695 (8th Cir.1997); Crain v. Board of Police Com’rs, 920 F.2d 1402 , 1405-1406 (8th Cir.1990). See also State of Minnesota, Dept. of Revenue v. … Brown v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In re Bennett

    528 B.R. 273 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 2015

    See Rhone-Poulenc Surfactants & Specialties, L.P. v. C.I.R., 249 F.3d 175, 180 (3d Cir.2001) (following Roberts v. Comm’r, 175 F.3d 889, 893-96 (11th Cir.1999) and Freeman v. … a recommendation for decision to the Board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Montgomery Ward, LLC v. OTC International, Ltd. (In Re Montgomery Ward, LLC)

    348 B.R. 662 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Sep 12, 2006

    See NSC Creditor Trust v. … Robinson, Forklift Liquidating Trust v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.