Case law

Wells v. Sleep (In Re Michigan MacHine Tool Control Corp.)

381 B.R. 657 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · Jan 31, 2008

In Pittsburgh Tube Co. v. … See also Taunt v.

Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Griffin (In re Griffin)

489 B.R. 638 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · Mar 18, 2013

V. Legal Analysis A. Modification of the Payment Terms of the Secured Claim Under Section 1322(c)(2). … See Witt v. United Companies Lending Corp.

Lipscomb ex rel. LMI GUC Trust v. Clairvest Equity Partners Ltd. Partnership (In re LMI Legacy Holdings, Inc.)

553 B.R. 235 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · Jun 3, 2016

Edgar v. MITE Corp., 457 U.S. 624, 645-46 , 102 S.Ct. 2629 , 73 L.Ed.2d 269 (1982). . E.g. Lou v. Belzberg, 728 F.Supp. 1010, 1023 (S.D.N.Y.1990); Bernstein v. … See also Allegaert v.

In Re Federated Department Stores, Inc.

135 B.R. 950 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 8, 1992

Co. v. Comm’r, 30 B.T.A. 973 (1934), acq. … Lucas, 48 F.2d 187, 189 (5th Cir.1931); United States v. Young, 604 F.Supp. 164, 170 (N.D.Okla.1984); L. Heller & Son, Inc. v. Comm’r., 12 T.C. 1109, 1112 (1949); Kornhauser v.

560 Ocean Club, L.P. v. Ocean Club Condominium Ass'n (In Re 560 Ocean Club, L.P.)

133 B.R. 310 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 24, 1991

In Carr v. … Skoda Enterprises v. Ocean Club Condominium Association and Powers v.

Mukamal v. D.R. Horton, Inc. (In re Majorca Isles Master Ass'n)

560 B.R. 824 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · Oct 21, 2016

(“Majorca TV”), and Majorca Isles V Condominium Association, Inc. (“Majorca V’) (individually, “Local Association” and collectively, “Local Associations”). D.R. … See, e.g., Flying Fish Bikes, Inc. v. Giant Bicycle, Inc., 181 F.Supp.3d 957, 974-75 , 2016 WL 695972, at *13 (M.D.Fla.2016)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v.

In re Blue Chip Capital

600 B.R. 735 · United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2019

IV The dismissal of the case, upholding EverCap's right to bar the filing of a bankruptcy case, and the court's determination that only Brown is authorized to operate the debtor, will also require denial of the debtor's applications … V Orders follow.

Foxmeyer Health Corp. v. McKesson Corp. (In Re Foxmeyer Corp.)

230 B.R. 791 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Nov 19, 1998

Wood v. Wood, 825 F.2d 90 (5th Cir.1987). … Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069 , 1076 n. 21 (5th Cir.1984). Judicial economy compels that this dispute, both the Avatex claims and the trustee’s claims, be tried in one forum.

RSH Liquidating Trust v. Magnacca

553 B.R. 298 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Jun 8, 2016

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 , 129 S.Ct 1937 , 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. … In Arnold v. Soc’y for Sav.

Carbo Ceramics, Inc. v. Board of Tax Assessors for Wilkinson County Georgi

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · Apr 12, 2023

Begner v. United States, 428 F.3d 998, 1005 (11th Cir. 2005). … Underwood v. Colony Bank, 362 Ga. App. 548, 553 (2022) (citing Hanham v. Access Mgmt. Group L.P., 305 Ga. 414, 417 (2019)).

In Re City of Bridgeport

128 B.R. 688 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Jul 22, 1991

.”); Fry v. … State v. Gonzalez, 210 Conn. 446 , 556 A.2d 137, 139 (1989); Hope v. Cavallo, 163 Conn. 576 , 316 A.2d 407 (1972); Brown ex rel. Gray v. Quintilian, 121 Conn. 300 , 184 A. 382 (1936).

Integrated Pharm., Inc. v. Chatterjee (In re Chatterjee)

594 B.R. 15 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 28, 2018

Seder v. Gibbs , 333 Mass. 445 , 453, 131 N.E.2d 376 (1956). Johnson v. Witkowski , 30 Mass.App.Ct. 697 , 705, 573 N.E.2d 513 (1991). 62. … Palmacci v. Umpierrez, 121 F.3d 781 , 790 (1st Cir. 1997), citing Desmond v.

In Re Washington Manufacturing Co.

101 B.R. 944 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 23, 1989

BROWN, Bankruptcy Judge, Sitting by Designation. … Louisville Black Police Officers Organization, Inc. v. City of Louisville, 700 F.2d 268, 278 (6th Cir.1983) (a civil rights case interpreting Northcross v.

McKibben v. Titus County Appraisal District (In Re McKibben)

233 B.R. 378 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · Apr 23, 1999

Harlow v. … In Anderson v.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Vartec Telecom, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Finance Cooperative (In Re Vartec Telecom Inc.)

335 B.R. 631 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · Dec 16, 2005

Kittay v. Atlantic Bank of New York (In re Global Service Group, LLC), 316 B.R. 451, 456 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2004) (Bernstein, C.J.) (quoting Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1350 (7th Cir.1983)). … Schacht v. Brown, 711 F.2d 1343, 1350 (7th Cir.1983) (citations omitted).

In Re Dunnaway

466 B.R. 515 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · Mar 6, 2012

David & Erin Brown. … The firearm is located at the Browns’ residence.

In Re Peacock

292 B.R. 593 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 23, 2002

Daugherty v. … (quoting Dennis v. Smith, 125 Ohio St. 120, 125 , 180 N.E. 638, 640 (1932))); Slutsky v.

Hermosilla v. Hermosilla (In Re Hermosilla)

450 B.R. 276 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 1, 2011

Brown (“Attorney Brown”), to file a fee application (the “Fee Application”), which he did, and to which Attorney Baker filed a response, asserting that the fees requested are grossly excessive. … See Brown v. Federation of State Medical Bds., 830 F.2d 1429 , 1435 (7th Cir.1987); Century Prods., Inc. v. Sutter, 837 F.2d 247, 250-51 (6th Cir.1988); Thomas v. Capital Sec.

In re Gomes

591 B.R. 68 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 4, 2018

See In re Brown , 371 B.R. 486 , 497 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2007), amended by 371 B.R. 505 (Bankr. N.D. Okla. 2007). See Turner v. Davis, Gillenwater & Lynch (In re Inv. … See Grogan v.

In Re Wood Family Interests, Ltd.

135 B.R. 407 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · May 24, 1989

The Debtor argues that the case of Browne v. Steck, 2 Colo. 70 (1873) should be controlling regarding the imposition of default rate of interest. However, this case is inapplicable to the instant matter. … In Browne , the Court correctly held that the interest rate charged on a promissory note should bear a reasonable relationship to the value of money.