Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.57s
459 B.R. 757 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 28, 2011
Northeastern Bank of Pennsylvania (In re Milford Group, Inc.), 164 B.R. 892, 898 (Bankr.M.D.Pa.1993); Brown v. Davis (In re Davis), 172 B.R. 696, 700 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.1993); Hackeling v. Rael Automatic Sprinkler Co. … . *770 In Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Incorporated— Pension Fund v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedIndustrial Insurance Services, Inc. v. Zick (In Re Zick)
100 B.R. 867 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · May 30, 1989
Plaintiff argues that this court’s decision in Brown v. … In re Brown, 56 B.R. at 960 . Absent proof that the entire debt or some part of it relates to nondischargeable conduct, that pre-petition debt will be discharged. 11 U.S.C. sec. 523 (c). Under Brown v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedKlingman v. Levinson (In Re Levinson)
58 B.R. 831 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 18, 1986
RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL The Supreme Court in Brown v. … Most courts, especially in recent months, have followed the lead of Brown and applied collateral estoppel when the state law standards match those of the Bankruptcy Code. See Spilman v.
Cited 39 timesPublishedRiesz v. Youngstrand (In Re Youngstrand)
16 B.R. 238 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Dec 16, 1981
The Plaintiffs contend that the state court judgment is conclusive and bars reliti-gation in this court of the issues involved in the state court litigation, citing Brown v. … Brown v. Felsen, supra.
Cited 5 timesPublished289 B.R. 188 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Oct 10, 2002
In the case of Brown v. … Brown, 152 B.R. at 938 , citations omitted. Since the right of recoupment carries no right to payment, it is not a claim.
Cited 6 timesPublishedHansen v. Lexington Court, LLC (In Re Sage Richmond, LLC)
2 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 759 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · Apr 15, 2003
In re Brown, 237 B.R. at 321; see also In re Gray, 97 B.R. at 936 (stating that a credi *61 tor should resolve the uncertainty through adjudication in the bankruptcy court); Burley v. Am. … Brown v. Town & Country Sales & Serv., Inc. (In re Brown), 237 B.R. 316, 321 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1999). Some courts have articulated the standard as a "reckless or callous disregard for the law or rights of others.”
Cited 0 timesPublished201 B.R. 216 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · Oct 7, 1996
Brown, No. 95 B 16825, slip op. at 5. … V.
Cited 5 timesPublished11 B.R. 432 · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · Jun 1, 1981
In Perez v. … Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 , 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954) involved a challenge to the validity of racial segregation in the District of Columbia Schools. This case was decided on the same day as Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublished159 B.R. 602 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Oct 6, 1993
Barnes v. … James v.
Cited 29 timesPublished425 B.R. 749 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 2010
Machne Menachem, Inc. v. … Machne Menachem, Inc. v. Hershkop, 237 F.Supp.2d at 240 .
Cited 4 timesPublished128 B.R. 592 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · Mar 8, 1991
LTV Steel Company, Inc. v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School District (In re Chateaugay Corp., Reomar, Inc.), 93 B.R. 26, 30 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) (quoting, Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc. … But see, Shugrue v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHouston v. Capps (In Re Capps)
193 B.R. 955 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 29, 1995
Co. v. Lucas, 41 B.R. 923, 925 (D.Pa.1984); Martino v. Brown, 34 B.R. 116, 117 (D.N.M.1983); In re Kawczynski, 442 F.Supp. 413 , 418 (W.D.N.Y.1977); Kaufman v. … Board of Education of Passaic v. Board of Education of Township of Wayne, 120 N.J.Super. 155 , 293 A.2d 445, 450 (Law Div.1972). An erroneous or mistaken interpretation of a contract is a “mistake of law." J.W.
Cited 9 timesPublishedMi-Lor Corp. v. Gottsegen (In Re Mi-Lor Corp.)
233 B.R. 608 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · May 7, 1999
Thus the statute was tolled during the period when Stuart and Wald constituted a board majority, and was further tolled until a disinterested board majority, in the persons of Lawrence and Steven, acquired the requisite knowledge … Particularly instructive on the present question is the decision in Heaper v. Brown (In re Heaper), 214 B.R. 576 (8th Cir. BAP 1997).
Cited 13 timesPublishedHopkins v. First NLC Financial Services, LLC (In Re Hopkins)
372 B.R. 734 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 2007
See Ramadan v. Chase Manhattan Corp., 156 F.3d 499, 502 (3d Cir.1998). In order to implement TILA, the Federal Reserve Board promulgated Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. … Brown v. Mortgagestar, Inc., 194 F.Supp.2d 473, 477 (S.D.W.Va.2002).
Cited 7 timesPublished511 B.R. 922 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Jun 27, 2014
*923 MEMORANDUM DECISION SUSAN V. KELLEY, Bankruptcy Judge. … See Brown, 463 B.R. at 139 (collecting cases). The Brown court denied a modification where the debtor experienced no change in financial circumstances, but simply did not wish to pay for repairs to her vehicle.
Cited 2 timesPublished521 B.R. 539 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · Nov 5, 2014
See Wooley v. … Benjamin v.
Cited 6 timesPublished285 B.R. 580 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Nov 15, 2002
See, e.g., Homsy v. … Robins Co. v. Piccinin (In re A.H.
Vacated by In Re Adelphia Communications Corp., 298 B.R. 49 (2003)Cited 9 timesPublishedNeilson v. Agnew (In Re Harris Agency, LLC)
465 B.R. 410 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 2011
& Brown Insurance of Nevada, Inc. … (“Brown & Brown”) for $5.25 million; AND the Agreement calling for payments in three installments; AND financing for the first installment for the Brown & Brown payment having been obtained by Brooke Credit Corporation (“
Cited 9 timesPublishedFederal Deposit Insurance v. Tackett (In Re Tackett)
67 B.R. 354 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 20, 1986
Kaye v. Hirsch, 14 B.R. 59, 62 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1981). A debtor’s intent is not relevant where the objection to discharge is based on the failure to keep books and records. See Schultz v. … See Seidle v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedBrandt v. Hicks, Muse & Co. (In Re Healthco International, Inc.)
208 B.R. 288 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 9, 1997
In Bovay v. H.M. … Slattery v.
Cited 25 timesPublished
Ask Donna