Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.06s
Eisenberg v. Incorporated Village of Mineola (In Re IDH Realty Inc.)
16 B.R. 55 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Dec 3, 1981
. & Builders Co. v. Philip Goldstein, N. Y. C. Dept. of Buildings and N. Y. C. Board of Standards and Appeals, 658 F.2d 39 , 8 B.C.D. 236 (2 Cir., 1981). … Pinellas Motel Partnership v. Ramada Inns Inc., 2 B.R. 113 , 5 B.C.D. 1292 (Bkrtcy.M.D.Fla.1979).
Cited 16 timesPublished115 B.R. 119 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 4, 1990
Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc. (In re Dant & Russell, Inc.), 853 F.2d at 704 ; see also Committee v. Johns-Manville Corp. (In re Johns-Manville Corp.), 60 B.R. at 618 ; Johnston v. First Street Cos. … Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc. (In re Dant & Russell, Inc.), 853 F.2d at 704-06 ; Committee v. Johns-Manville Corp. (In re Johns-Manville Corp.), 60 B.R. at 616-19 ; Johnston v. First Street Cos.
Cited 17 timesPublishedBarrett v. Commonwealth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Barrett)
113 B.R. 175 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 1990
See Durrett v. Washington Nat’l Ins. … See also Brown, supra, 104 B.R. at 613.
Reversed on other grounds by In Re Barrett, 118 B.R. 255 (1990)Cited 8 timesPublishedWilliams v. Gurley (In Re Williams)
3 B.R. 401 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · Jan 25, 1980
In Brown v. … Therefore, this Court will adopt the rationale of Brown v.
Cited 41 timesPublished295 B.R. 726 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · Jul 24, 2003
He further observed that courts “will uphold the board’s decisions as long as they are attributable ‘to any rational business purpose.’” CRTF Corp. v. … Ltd. v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedNisswa State Bank v. Eberle (In Re Eberle)
61 B.R. 638 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · Sep 9, 1985
In Re Brown, 32 B.R. 554, 557 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1983). … Bennet v. W.T.
Cited 9 timesPublished163 B.R. 918 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · Feb 14, 1994
Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 131 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2209 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). … Brown, 442 U.S. at 139 , 99 S.Ct. at 2213 . In Brown v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedMA&M Inc. v. Supple (In Re Supple)
14 B.R. 898 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Oct 21, 1981
DISCUSSION In determining the effect of the state court judgment on the parties, the plaintiff and the debtor engage in an analysis of the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Brown v. … The “identity of standards” test had its origins in the footnote in the Brown v.
Cited 38 timesPublishedHardesty v. Citifinancial, Inc. (In Re Roberts)
402 B.R. 808 · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 2009
Brown, 3 Ohio 140, 154 , 1827 WL 36 at *9 (emphasis added). See also Adm’r of Veterans Affairs v. City Loan, 1985 WL 9128 at *2 (Ohio Ct.App. … (citing Brown v. Farran). And the words used by the notary public in the instant case — executed before me — necessarily imply that the Roberts appeared before her.
Cited 12 timesPublishedLewison Bros. v. Washington Savings Bank (In Re Lewison Bros.)
162 B.R. 974 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · Apr 29, 1993
Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 137 , 99 S.Ct. 2205, 2212 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979); Pepper v. Litton, 308 U.S. 295, 303-306 , 60 S.Ct. 238, 244-45 , 84 L.Ed. 281 (1939). … In Brown v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedIn re Heartland Memorial Hospital, LLC
473 B.R. 897 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · Jun 21, 2012
McAllan v. … United States v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMontgomery v. Kurtz (In Re Kurtz)
170 B.R. 596 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · Aug 9, 1994
Additionally, the Supreme Court in Brown v. … The Sixth Circuit in Spilman v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedNavarra v. Maggi (In re Maggi)
57 B.R. 446 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · Nov 14, 1985
United States v. Bejar-Matrecios, 618 F.2d 81, 83 (9th Cir.1980); Ivers v. United States, 581 F.2d 1362, 1367 (9th Cir.1978); see also cases cited in Otherson v. … v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIndustrial Insurance Services, Inc. v. Zick (In Re Zick)
100 B.R. 867 · United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · May 30, 1989
Plaintiff argues that this court’s decision in Brown v. … In re Brown, 56 B.R. at 960 . Absent proof that the entire debt or some part of it relates to nondischargeable conduct, that pre-petition debt will be discharged. 11 U.S.C. sec. 523 (c). Under Brown v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedHood v. Bennitt (In Re Bennitt)
348 B.R. 820 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · Aug 28, 2006
Holman v. Joe Steele Realty, Inc., 485 So.2d 1142, 1144 (Ala.1986); Cook v. Brown, 393 So.2d 1016, 1019 (Ala.Civ.App.1981). … The federal court’s decision in Board of County Sup’rs of Prince William County, Va. v. Scottish & York Ins.
Cited 9 timesPublished130 B.R. 990 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · Sep 5, 1991
Brown and IRS Group Manager William V. … Brown’s supervisor, William V. Poss, was not called as a witness by either side.)
Cited 21 timesPublishedHankin v. Mersey Mold & Model Co. (In Re Countryside Manor, Inc.)
239 B.R. 443 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · Sep 15, 1999
The defendant submitted the single affidavit of Timothy Brown (“Brown”), its vice-president, in support of its argument that there are genuine issues to be tried. … See Hirsch v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBarnett Bank of Tampa v. Muscatell (In Re Muscatell)
116 B.R. 295 · United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · Jun 28, 1990
Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, 780 F.2d 823 (9th Cir.1986). An attorney must make a reasonable inquiry into both the factual and legal basis for claims and defenses asserted. Brown v. … Weisman v. Rivlin, 598 F.Supp. 724 (D.D.C.1984).
Cited 6 timesPublished24 B.R. 183 · United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 4, 1982
In Brown v. … The Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublished20 B.R. 60 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 28, 1982
Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938); Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Mfg. Co., Inc., 313 U.S. 487 , 61 S.Ct. 1020 , 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941); See also Matter of D. H. … This provision has been construed as requiring a quorum consisting of “the majority of the entire number of authorized directors . . . notwithstanding the existence of vacancies on the board.” Avien, Inc. v.
Cited 19 timesPublished
Ask Donna