Case law

Brown v. Daugherty

120 F. 526 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri · Feb 10, 1903

In Rodgers v. … Wade v. Hardy, 75 Mo. 399 ; Bray v. Marshall, 75 Mo. 327 ; Noble v. Blount, 77 Mo. 235 ; Hammerslough v. Cheatham, 84 Mo. 21 .

Brown v. Arnold

127 F. 387 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Jan 6, 1904

Egan v. Rooney, 38 How. Prac. 121 ; Lusk v. Hastings, 1 Hill, 659 ; McLain v. Watkins, 43 Ill. 24 ; Test v. Larsh, 98 Ind. 301 ; White v. Johnson, 67 Mc. 287; Clark v. McGregor, 55 Mich. 412 , 21 N. W. 866 ; Jackson v. … Most certainly the judge did not expect that when counsel obtained a stipulation he should consign it to some unmapped potter’s field, without head or foot board, and that the court should be required to become the angel

United States v. Brown

67 F. Supp. 116 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Aug 22, 1946

In McMahan v. … However, in Thomas v.

Brown v. Deere

6 F. 487 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Feb 5, 1881

Marsh, 6 Fisher, 401; Bliss v. City of Brooklyn, 4 Fisher, 597; Morris v. Lowell Manuf'g Co. 3 Fisher, 51; Sanders v. Logan, 2 Fisher, 170; Kirby, etc., v. White, 1 Fed. Rep. 604; Potter v. … Mack, 3 Fisher, 386; Whitney v. Mowry, 3 Fisher, 175.

Goldsmith v. Brown

33 F. 691 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Feb 8, 1888

Does your honor hold that Justice Miller went beyond the rulings of your honor in Weil v. Polack? The Court. I think he clearly overruled the case of Clapp v. Nordmeyer, 25 Fed. … I have several times, since Justice Miller overruled the motion for a rehearing in Weil v. Polack, (thereby overruling Clapp v.

Brown v. Deere

6 F. 484 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Jan 15, 1881

Kibler v. Brown

114 F. 1014 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Mar 21, 1902

Brown] deliver to this plaintiff all tux bills in his hands remaining yet uncollected, and received by him as receiver of such bank, and for all sums of money which may have been received by the said W. A.

Cella, Adler & Tilles v. Brown

136 F. 439 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Mar 1, 1905

Ed. 1122 ; Bacon v. Rives, 106 U. S. 99, 104 , 1 Sup. Ct. 3, 27 L. Ed. 69 ; Wormley v. Wormley, 8 Wheat. 421, 451 , 5 L. Ed. 651 ; Wood v. Davis, 18 How. 467, 475 , 15 L. Ed. 460 ; Sioux City Terminal R. & W. Co. v. … Blake v. McKim, 103 U. S. 336, 338 , 26 L. Ed. 563 ; Hyde v. Ruble, 104 U. S. 407, 409 , 26 L. Ed. 823 ; Geer v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 190 U. S. 428, 432 , 23 Sup. Ct. 807, 47 L. Ed. 1122 ; Gudger v. Western N. C. R.

Brown Chemical Co. v. Myer

31 F. 453 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Jun 30, 1887

Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 323 ; Amoskeag Manuf'g Co. v. Spear, 2 Sandf. 599 ; Raggett v. Findlater, L. R. 17 Eq. 29; Manufacturing Co. v. Trainer, 101 U. S. 54 . … Croft v. Day, 7 Beav. 84; Holloway v. Holloway, 13 Beav. 209; Wotherspoon v. Currie, L. R. 5 H. L. 508; McLean v. Fleming, 96 U. S. 251 ; Levy v. Walker, 10 Ch. Div. 447; Seixo v. Provezende, L.

Brown & Haywood Co. v. Ligon

92 F. 851 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Mar 17, 1899

Johnson v. Risk, 137 U. S. 300 , 11 Sup. Ct. 111; Bank v. Leyser, 116 Mo. 51 , 22 S. W. 504 ; Locke v. Homer, 131 Mass. 93 ; Farnsworth v. Boardman, Id. 115 ; Shattuck v. Adams, 136 Mass. 34 ; Conner v. Reeves, 103 N. … E. 439 ; Jones v. Childs, 8 Nev. 121 .

Board of Trade v. National Board of Trade

154 F. 238 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Mar 25, 1907

This paragraph sets out, with perhaps some unnecessary detail, the manner of the operation of the complainant Board of Trade, or exchange, and the way in which the information of the operations and markets of the board are … This allegation is not immaterial, as it bears upon the history and purposes of the organization of said National Board of Trade of Kansas City and its pretensions. This exception must be overruled. Exception 21.

Brown v. Fisk

23 F. 228 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Mar 20, 1885

Patterson v. Lynde, 106 U. S. 519 ; S. C. 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 432.

Western Union Tel. Co. v. Brown

32 F. 337 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Oct 8, 1887

In Ayres v. Wiswall, 112 U. S. 187 , 5 Sup. Ct. … Following this case comes that of Hyde v. Ruble, 104 U.

United States ex rel. Harshman v. Brown

41 F. 481 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Feb 28, 1890

In the case of Logan v. … Bank v. Winslow, 30 Fed. Rep. 488, and cases cited. 2. With respect to the other point urged, namely, that relator does not show any lawful claim to the fund, it is sufficient to say that the decision in U. S. v.

Board of Trade v. Price

179 F. 399 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Jun 17, 1910

Price, individually and as' the Price Commission Company, from receiving and Using the continuous quotations of the Chicago Board of Trade in the city of St. Rouis. … Price is directly or indirectly participating in, or is or was connected with, the Price Commission Company, or using the quotations of the Chicago Board of Trade as an individual.

Board of Trade v. Donovan Commission Co.

121 F. 1012 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Apr 6, 1903

The main facts controlling these cases are stated and much of the evidence now before me is set out in the case of Board of Trade v. O’Dell Commission Company (C. … After careful consideration of the proof, it is found that the “continuous quotations” in question result largely from wagering on the future price of grain and hog products by the members of the board of trade operating

Expanded Metal Co. v. Board of Education

103 F. 287 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Jun 30, 1900

It is, therefore, in my opinion, brought within the doctrine of the case of Smith v. Vulcanite Co., 93 U. S. 486 , 23 L, Ed. 952.

Wolf Bros. v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.

192 F. 930 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Jan 17, 1912

Watch Co. v. Elgin Nat. Watch Co., 94 Fed. 667 , 35 C. C. A. 237 ; Elgin Nat. Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Co., 179 U. S. 665 , 21 Sup. Ct. 270, 45 L. Ed. 365 ; Allen B. Wrisley Co. v. Iowa Soap Co., 59 C. C. … Shaw Stocking Co. v. Mack (C. C.) 12 Fed. 707 ; Dennison Mfg. Co. v. Thomas Mfg. Co. (C. C.) 94 Fed. 651 .

Bonham v. Board of Education

3 F. Cas. 850 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Missouri · Jul 1, 1877

Commissioners of Douglas Co. v. Bolles (decided at the October term, 1876, of the supreme court of the United States) 94 U. S. 104 . … Jordan v. Cass Co. [Case No. 7,517].

Erwin v. St. Joseph Board of Public Schools

12 F. 680 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Nov 15, 1880

Joseph should be exercised by the board. … I fully concur in the reasoning on this subject in the case of Gauss v. Clarksville, 19 Alb. Law J. 253 .