Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersFMA

513 results

0.54s

  • Gilman v. Brown

    10 F. Cas. 392 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1817

    When it is stated, that “the board has expressed an opinion, that the vendors in this case conveyed only an equitable title,” (and by the vendors. … Hughes v. Kearney, 1 Schoales & L. 132; Nairn v. Browse, 6 Ves. 752; Mackreth v. Symmons, 15 Ves. 329; Blackburn v. Gregson, 1 Brown, Ch. 420; Garson v. Green, 1 Johns. Ch. 308 ; Gibbons v. Baddali, 2 Eq. Cas.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Jones

    4 F. Cas. 404 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1815

    In one case (Ewer v. … The cause, however, went off upon another point, and, in a subsequent case (Hyde v. Partridge, 2 Ld.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lull

    4 F. Cas. 407 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1836

    S.] 675; in Spafford v. Dodge, 14 Mass. 66 ; in Beale v. Thompson, 4 East. 546; and in Abb. Shipp, pt 4, c. 3, § 2, pp. 458-464. and notes. … If courts of law have felt themselves bound down to a more limited exercise of jurisdiction, as it seems from the cases of Appleby v. Dods, S East, 300, and Jesse v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Iasigi v. Brown

    12 F. Cas. 1146 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1853

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hicks

    24 F. 811 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Aug 26, 1885

    Shipp. & Adm. 57; Story, Partn. § 42; Baxter v. Rodman, 3 Pick. 435 ; Parsons v. Terry, 1 Low. 60 . … Parsons v. Terry, 1 Low. 60 . The decree of the district court is reversed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cahill v. Brown

    4 F. Cas. 1005 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 9, 1878

    Betts v. Menzies, 7 Law T. (N. S.) 110. … Cahill v. Beckford [Case No. 2,290].

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nutter v. Brown

    96 F. 229 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jul 28, 1899

    BROWN, District Judge. This suit is for infringement of letters patent No. 491,012, issued January 31, 1893, to Lewis E. Erieson, for a bicycle bell.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Piper v. Brown

    19 F. Cas. 718 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1870

    Earle v. Sawyer Case No. 4,247]. … For other cases involving this patent, see Piper v. Moon. Case No. 11,182: Piper v. Moon, 91 U. S. 44 ; Piper v. Brown, Case No. 11,181.] Charles F.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Whittemore

    4 F. Cas. 437 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1872

    For other cases involving this patent, see Edgarton v. Breck, Case No. 4,279; Edgarton v. Furst & Bradley Manuf’g Co., 9 Fed. 451 .]

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Leatherbee v. Brown

    69 F. 590 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Sep 16, 1895

    Sharp v. Reissner 9 Fed. 445 ; Korn v. Wiebusch, 33 Fed. 50 . … Boston Woven Hose Co. v. Star Rubber Co., 40 Fed. 167 ; Linotype Co. v. Ridder, 65 Fed. 853 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Iasigi v. Brown

    12 F. Cas. 1147 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1853

    Brown, it will be “discreetly” used by himself. This, if the word “confidential” were omitted from the reply, would leave the matter to Mr. … Brown did not know that Mr. Curtis wrote his letter at the request of the plaintiffs or any other party.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Duchesne

    4 F. Cas. 369 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1855

    See, also, the case of Universities of Oxford & Cambridge v. Richardson, 6 Ves. 689; Thomson v. Advocate-General, 12 Clark & F. 1. … Brown v. Duchesne, 19 How. (GO U. S.) 183.] _ The right of every nation, by its laws, to regulate the structure and equipment of its vessels of commerce, must be allowed to be complete and entire.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bridge v. Brown

    4 F. Cas. 89 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Apr 15, 1871

    Allen v. Blunt [Case No. 216]; Battin v. Taggert, 17 How. [58 U. S.] 83; Sickles v. Evans [Case No. 12,839.] … Brown, Case No. 1,858.]

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bridge v. Brown

    4 F. Cas. 92 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jan 15, 1873

    complainants to restrain an alleged infringement by the same defendants of patent for a process for extracting tan-bark in conjunction with the apparatus which was the subject-matter of the litigation herein, see Bridge v. … Brown, Case No. 1,857.]

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Prindle v. Brown

    136 F. 616 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Mar 29, 1905

    found in favor of Prindle; that, on appeal to *617 the board of examiners in chief, priority was awarded to Brown; that the Commissioner affirmed the decision of the examiners in chief; and that the Court of Appeals for the … Christie v. Seybold, 55 Fed. 69, 78 , 5 C. C. A. 33 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Piper v. Brown

    19 F. Cas. 722 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jan 21, 1873

    Sparhawk v. Wills, 5 Gray, 423 ; Boston Iron Co. v. King, 2 Cush. 405 ; Adams v. Brown. 7 Cush. 222 . Defendants except to the master’s report as to his findings in respect to the operations of the year 1870. … [For other cases involving this patent, see note to Piper v. Brown, Case No. 11,180.] No commissions were paid by defendants for selling the fish preserved by them.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Duchesne

    4 F. Cas. 369 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1854

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Davoll v. Brown

    7 F. Cas. 197 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1845

    Grant v. Raymond, 6 Pet. [31 U. S.] 218. See, also, Ames v. Howard [Case No. 326]; Wyeth v. Stone, [Id. 18,107]; Blanchard v. Sprague [Id. 1,518]. … McFarlane v. Price, 1 Starkie, 199; Rex v. Cutler, Id. 354; Wyeth v. Stone [Case No. 18,107]; Blanchard v. Sprague [Case No. 1,518]; Ames v. Howard [supra]; 11 East, 101.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    24 F. Cas. 1271 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1816

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Brown

    126 F. 429 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 28, 1901

    It is admitted that this contention was determined adversely to the defendant in Hale v. Hardon, 95 Fed. 747 , 37 C. C. A. 240 . … Richardson v. Merritt, 74 Minn. 354 , 77 N. W. 234, 407, 968 . It is the rule generally laid down in the text-books. The rule appears to be reasonable.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.