Case law

Cooper v. Brown

6 F. Cas. 470 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Jun 15, 1841

Utricht v. Melchor, 1 Dall. [1 U. S.] 428; Howes v. Barker, 3 Johns. 509 . … In Fuller v.

Moore v. Brown

17 F. Cas. 668 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Jun 15, 1847

United States v. Lancaster

26 F. Cas. 854 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Jun 15, 1841

Rex v. Clark, 1 Brod. & B. 473; Rex v. Sheen, 2 Car. & P. 634; Rex v. Emden. 9 East. 437. … C. 245; Rex v.

Bork v. Norton

3 F. Cas. 902 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Jun 15, 1841

In the case of Bent v. … Hustin v. Union Ins. Co. [Case No. 6,942]. In Cook v.

Gale v. Norris

9 F. Cas. 1078 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Jun 15, 1841

Clarke v. Magruder, 2 Har. & J. 77 ; Welsh v. Barrett, 15 Mass. 386 ; Brown v. Brown, 2 Wash. (Va.) 151; Union Bank v. Knapp. 8 Pick. 96 ; Patton’s Adm’rs v. Craig’s Adm’rs, 7 Serg. & R. 126; Hood v. … . & P 532; Halliday v. Martinet, 20 Johns. 168 : Wilbur v. Selden, 6 Cow. 162 .

Hunt v. The Cleveland

12 F. Cas. 904 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Oct 15, 1853

Clark v. Barnwell, 12 How. [53 U. S.] 272. Apply these principles to the facts in this case. The casks were stowed in the after part of the forward hold, which was a proper and safe place for that kind of merchandise. … Adm. 684, etc.; Senat v. Porter, 7 Term R. 158; Arn. Ins. 1337; The Emma, 2 W. Rob. Adm. 315. There was a protest noted and properly extended on the arrival of the propeller at Chicago, but it has not been introduced.

Kuter v. Michigan Cent. R. Co.

14 F. Cas. 884 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Oct 15, 1853

[Cases Nos. 18,006, 18,007]; also, Citizens’ Bank v. Nantucket Steamboat Co. [Case No. 2,730], As to money carried in a trunk, see Orange County Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. 85 ; Gibbon v. Paynton. 4 Burrows, 2298; Batson v. … Id. 283; Belger v. Dinsmore, 51 Barb. 69 ; Betts v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 21 Wis. 80 : Boorman v. American Exp. Co., Id. 152 ; Evansville & C. R. Co. v. Young, 28 Ind. 516 ; American Exp. Co. v. Sands. 55 Pa.

Hill v. Smith

12 F. Cas. 177 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Jun 15, 1841

This point was examined in the case of Piatt v. Oliver [Case No. 11,115]. … Lord Compton v. Oxenden, 2 Ves. Jr. 263; 4 Brown, Ch. 398; Gardner v. Astor, 3 Johns. Ch. 53 ; 2 Fonbl. 362, c. 6, § 8.

Holden v. Collins

12 F. Cas. 330 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Dec 15, 1850

In Irving v. … [See Moore v. Brown, 11 How. (52 U. S.) 414.] If we apply this rule to the facts of this case, it will be manifest that the defendant had not such a claim or color of title.

Hubbard v. Turner

12 F. Cas. 783 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Jul 1, 1841

Brown and William W. Salton-stall. … This paper, with others, was acknowledged before Henry Brown, a justice of the peace, on the evening of the 10th of July, and the next morning Turner left the city.

Commercial Acetylene Co. v. Searchlight Gas Co.

188 F. 85 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois · Apr 25, 1911

The court in Acetylene Company v. … This was suggested by the board of examiners.