Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.79s
Holrail, LLC v. Surface Transportation Board
515 F.3d 1313 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 2008
Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 118 (1994). “In determining whether a statutory provision speaks directly to the question before us, we consider it in context.” Holly Sugar Corp. v. Johanns, 437 F.3d 1210, 1213 (D.C. … Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRussell v. Harman International Industries, Inc.
773 F.3d 253 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 12, 2014
See Colbert v. Potter, 471 F.3d 158, 168 (D.C. … Compare Trucking Emp’rs, 561 F.2d at 318 (Title VII waivers must be knowing and voluntary), and Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 456 n.10 (D.C.
Cited 15 timesPublished653 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 2016
Allen v. Johnson, 795 F.3d 34, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 494 (D.C. Cir. 2008)). … See Anderson v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedAlden Leeds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
812 F.3d 159 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 5, 2016
Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. NLRB, 522 U.S. 359, 377 (1998). Credibility determinations made by the ALJ, as adopted by the Board, are accepted unless they are patently insupportable. NLRB v. … Co. v. NLRB, 380 U.S. 300, 318 (1965).
Cited 16 timesPublished122 F.2d 219 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 31, 1941
Brown, filed suit in the District Court for an absolute divorce from the appellant, Mary E. Brown, upon the ground of adultery. … Brown vs. Mary Estelle Brown, et al., Equity No. 67598,’ and by reason thereof it is, by the Court, this 29 day of June, 1940, “ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that the defendant, George A.
Cited 15 timesPublishedGentiva Health Services, Inc. v. Becerra
31 F.4th 766 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 2022
To 14 the extent the Board’s decision is based “on the [text] of the Medicare Act itself, [the court] owe[s] deference [to the Board] under Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. … Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defs. of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 666 (2007) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132–33 (2000)).
Cited 8 timesPublishedPrime Healthcare Services-Encino LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
890 F.3d 286 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 18, 2018
Standard of Review Our review of the Board’s judgment is limited. Wilkes- Barre Hosp. Co., LLC v. NLRB, 857 F.3d 364, 372 (D.C. Cir. 2017). … Although the Board is authorized to interpret a collective bargaining agreement to resolve unfair labor practice charges, we owe “no deference to the Board’s interpretation.” NLRB v. U.S.
Cited 2 timesPublished205 F.2d 720 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 1953
In Kephart v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAlan McSurely and Margaret McSurely v. John J. McClellan
521 F.2d 1024 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 1975
Tenney v. … Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). . Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 308 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). . McSurely v.
Cited 28 timesPublishedNCR Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
840 F.3d 838 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 2016
NLRB v. A.J. Tower Co., 329 U.S. 324, 330 (1946); see Durham School Servs., LP v. NLRB, 821 F.3d 52, 58 (D.C. Cir. 2016); Serv. Corp. Int’l v. NLRB, 495 F.3d 681, 684 (D.C. Cir. 2007). … of Ill. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDrug Plastics & Glass Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
44 F.3d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 27, 1995
Drug Plastics & Glass Co. v. NLRB, 30 F.3d 169 (D.C.Cir.1994). … (emphasis added) (quoting National Licorice Co. v. NLRB, 309 U.S. 350, 369 , 60 S.Ct. 569, 579 , 84 L.Ed. 799 (1940)). Thus, as we noted in G.W. Galloway Co. v.
Cited 27 timesPublishedLee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
310 F.3d 209 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 15, 2002
.”); Cobb Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. … Ill For the foregoing reasons, we deny Lee Lumber’s petition for review and grant the Board’s cross-application for enforcement. . See Sullivan Indus, v. NLRB, 957 F.2d 890 (D.C.Cir.1992); Williams Enters., Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished316 F. Supp. 3d 264 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 2018
A court considering a pro se plaintiff's complaint should look to "all filings, including filings responsive to a motion to dismiss," Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. , 789 F.3d 146 , 152 (D.C. … Murthy v. N.
Cited 17 timesPublished382 A.2d 1038 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1978
Cited 0 timesPublished121 F.2d 101 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1941
Moreover, in Lane v. … It read as follows: “Comes now the appellant, Mary Estelle Brown, through her attorney, and moves this Honorable Court to issue upon the appellee, George Brown, a rule to show cause, if any he has, why he should not be adjudged
Cited 1 timesPublishedTrident Seafoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
101 F.3d 111 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 1996
Act.’ ” NLRB v. … Accord NLRB v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedCarpenters & Millwrights, Local Union 2471 v. National Labor Relations Board
481 F.3d 804 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2007
Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983)). Our review of the Board’s refusal to pierce A.J. … See NLRB v. Fullerton Transfer & Storage Ltd., Inc., 910 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1990).
Cited 8 timesPublished18 F. Cas. 692 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802
Cited 2 timesPublished22 F. Cas. 315 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1837
Brown could not aban *316 don after underletting a part of the premises for the year.
Cited 1 timesPublishedKirkland v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
167 F.2d 529 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 19, 1948
J.188, 45 U.S.C.A. § 152 , Ninth. 2 Switchmen’s Union v. … Id. at 374-375 . \ 6 Id. at 212, 275 . 7 General Committee v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 320 U.S. 323, 338 , 64 S.Ct. 146, 153 , 88 L.Ed. 76 .
Cited 17 timesPublished
Ask Donna