Case law

Brown v. Grundy

111 F. 15 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Oct 8, 1901

De Wolf v. Johnson, 10 Wheat. 367 , 6 L. Ed. 343 ; Scudder v. Bank, 91 U. S. 406 , 23 L. Ed. 245 ; Trust Co. v. Krumseig, 172 U. S. 351 , 19 Sup. Ct. 179, 43 L. Ed. 474 . … Bank v. De Shon, 41 Ark. 331 -339.

Brown v. Hiatt

4 F. Cas. 384 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Arkansas · Jul 1, 1870

Brown.” … S., Id. 26S, and Tyler v. Defrees, Id. 331, decided by the supreme court, December term, 1870. Following these cases and the decision in Brown v.

Archer v. Board of Levee Inspectors

128 F. 125 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Feb 29, 1904

That the defendant is a corporation has been expressly determined by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit in Board of Levee Inspectors of Chicot County v. Crittenden, 94 Fed. 613 , 36 C. C. … In Whitehead v. Arkansas Central R.

Kansas City S. Ry. Co. v. Board of Railroad Com'rs

106 F. 353 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · Feb 5, 1901

Co. v. … Co. v. Board of R. Com’rs, 9 Sawy. 253 , 18 Fed. 10 , Mr.

Rankin v. Cooper

149 F. 1010 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · Jan 16, 1907

I have drawn the foregoing propositions largely from the leading cases of Briggs v. Spaulding, 141 U. S. 132 , 11 Sup. Ct. 924, 35 L. Ed. 662 , Gibbons v. Anderson (C. C.) 80 Fed. 345 , Martin v. Webb, 110 U. … Allis and his associates, viz., Bradford & Brown, H. P. Bradford, Bradford, Taylor & O’Connell, H. G.

Auten v. City Electric St. Ry. Co.

104 F. 395 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Oct 25, 1900

None of these authorities (1 Perry, Trusts, § 83; Browne, St. Frauds, § 108; Hill, Trustees, p. 61; 2 Story, Eq. Jur. § 979a; Tilden v. Green, 130 N. Y. 29 , 28 N. E. 880 , 14 L. R. … Frauds, § 240; Browne, St. Frauds, § 62.

Hynes v. Briggs

41 F. 468 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Jan 15, 1890

Robbins v. Taxing Dist., 120 U. S. 489 , 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 592; Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1091; Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123 ; Cook v. Pennsylvania, 97 U. S. 566 ; Welton v. Missouri, 91 U. … McGehee v. Mathis, 21 Ark. 40 ; Straub v. Gordon, 27 Ark. 625 ; City of Little Rock v. Barton, 33 Ark. 442 ; City of Little Rock v. Board, 42 Ark. 160 ; Baker v. State, 44 Ark. 134 .

Allen-West Commission Co. v. Brashear

176 F. 119 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Feb 28, 1910

Knapp v. Railroad Company, 20 Wall. 117 , 32 L. Ed. 328 ; Gardner v. Brown, 21 Wall. 36 , 22 L. Ed. 527 ; New Orleans v. Gaines, 138 U. S. 595, 606 , 11 Sup. Ct. 428, 34 L. Ed. 1102; Dodge v. Tulleys, 144 U. … A. 379 ; Board of Trustees v. Blair (C. C.) 70 Fed. 414 . In Shipp v.

Gould v. Little Rock, M. R. & T. Ry. Co.

52 F. 680 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Oct 28, 1892

Warner, 20 Vt. 426 ; Stratton v. Allen, 16 N. J. Eq. 229; Wilkinson v. Bauerle, 41. N. J. Eq. 635, 7 Atl. Rep. 514 ; Duncomb v. Railroad Co., 84 N. Y. 190 , 88 N. Y. 1 ; Harts v. Brown, 77 Ill. 226 ; Reichwald v. … Smith v. Skeary, 47 Conn. 47 . And to the same effect, see Duncomb v. Railroad Co., 84 N. Y. 190 , 88 N. Y. 1 ; Harts v. Brown, 77 Ill. 226 ; Reichwald v. Hotel Co., 106 Ill. 439 ; Stratton v. Allen, 16 N. J.

Van Lear v. Eisele

126 F. 823 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Dec 29, 1903

In Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 8 Wall. 533, 548 , 19 L. … In United States v. Reese, 92 U. S. 214 , 23 L.

Johnson v. Hunter

127 F. 219 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Jan 11, 1904

Thiá contention cannot be sustained, as the levee board, which was the sole complainant in those actions, is not made a party to this proceeding. Harwood v. Railroad Company, 17 Wall. 78, 81 , 21 L. … Wehrman v. Conklin, 155 U. S. 332 , 15 Sup. Ct. 129, 39 L. Ed. 167 ; Lynch v. Murphy, 161 U. S. 251 , 16 Sup. Ct. 523, 40 L. Ed. 688 ; Hamilton v. Brown, 161 U. S. 275 , 16 Sup. Ct. 585, 40 L. Ed. 691 ; Ormsby v.

Knight v. Shelton

134 F. 423 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Jan 7, 1905

In Sawyer v. … In People v.

Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Jones

105 F. 459 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Dec 29, 1900

Ed. 992 ; Hagood v. Southern, 117 U. S. 52 , 6 Sup. Ct. 608, 29 L. Ed. 805 ; Osborn v. Bank, 9 Wheat. 738 , 6 L. Ed. 204 ; Davis v. Gray, 16 Wall. 203 , 21 L. Ed. 447 ; Board v. McComb, 93 U. S. 531 ; 23 L. … See, also, Secretary v. McGarrahan, 9 Wall. 298 , 19 L. Ed. 579 ); and the duty must he ‘clear and indisputable’ (Commissioners v. Aspinwall, 24 How. 376 , 16 L. Ed. 735 ).” And see Board v. King, 14 C. C.

Railroad Tax Cases

136 F. 233 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Apr 1, 1905

R. v. People, 5 Colo. 63 . … In the case of Hubbard v.

In re Handlin

11 F. Cas. 421 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Apr 15, 1875

Pond v. Kimball, 101 Mass. 105 ; Guptil v. McFee, 9 Kan. 30 , a well-considered case, following Pond v. Kimball, and disapproving Stewart v. Brown, 37 N. Y. 350 ; Burns v. Harris, 67 N. C. 140 ; Bonsall v. Comly, 44 Pa. … Contra: In re Young [Case No. 18,148]; In re Rupp [Id. 12,141]; Stewart v. Brown, 37 N. Y. 350 ; Radcliff v. Wood, 25 Barb. 52 ; In re McKercher, 8 N. B. R. 409 . Reversed.

Shirk v. Pulaski County

21 F. Cas. 1323 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Apr 15, 1877

Lombard [Case No. 12.478]; Keller v. Commissioners Leavenworth Co. 6 Kan. 310 ; Goodnow v. Board Com'rs Ramsey Co., 11 Minn. 31 [ Gil. 12 ]; Dill. Mun. Oorp. § 412. and cases cited; Mayor of Nashville v. … Tp. v.

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. Stevenson

135 F. 553 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · Mar 4, 1905

Stevenson’s resignation as president was accepted on June 12, 1893, although the management of the corporation had passed completely into the control of the Missouri Coal & Construction Company on June 1, 1893, when its own board … Brown et al., 46 Ark. 34 : “It was competent for equity to grant the full measure of this relief.

Schenck v. Peay

21 F. Cas. 667 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Apr 15, 1868

Dunn v. Clarke, 8 Pet. [33 U. S.] 1; Clarke v. Mathewson, 12 Pet. [37 U. S.] 164; Cross v. De Valle, 1 Wall. [68 U. S.] 1. … Canal Com’rs. 9 Watts, 466 ; Green v. Miller, 6 Johns. 39 ; Kirk v. Bell, 12 Eng. Law & Eq. 385; Crocker v. Crane, 21 Wend. 211 : Doughty v. Hope, 1 N. Y. 79 ; Id., 3 Denio, 252 . 253.

Cockrill v. Butler

78 F. 679 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Feb 15, 1897

In Turnpike Co. v. … A statute of limitation must be treated as any other statute, because, as held by Justice Brown in Campbell v. City of Haverhill, 155 U. S. 617 , 15 Sup.

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Allen

187 F. 290 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · May 3, 1911

Ed. 853 ; Patapsco Guano Co. v. North Carolina Board, 171 U. S. 345, 350 , 18 Sup. Ct. 862, 43 L. Ed. 191 ; Erb v. Morasch, 177 U. S. 584 , 20 Sup. Ct. 819, 44 L. Ed. 897 ; Gladson v. Minnesota, 166 U. … Co. v.