Case law

Coe v. East & W. R. Co.

52 F. 531 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Jan 12, 1892

Caylus v. Railroad Co., 10 Hun, 295 ; Bronson v. Railroad Co., 2 Wall. 287 -311. … See Hart v. Lawman, 29 Barb. 410 ; Moore v. Railroad Co., 12 Barb. 156 ; Porter v. Railroad Co., 32 Me. 539 .

Taylor v. Decatur Mineral & Land Co.

112 F. 449 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · Jun 10, 1901

The case of Phosphate Co. v. Brown, *451 20 C. C. … Rep. 140 , was a bill filed by some of the stockholders of the company for the removal of members of the board of directors, for an injunction to restrain the board from voting unreasonable salaries, for an accounting, and

Kimball v. Mobile

14 F. Cas. 489 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Jun 15, 1877

In the case of Mobile Co. v. Kimball, 54 Ala. 56 , the law of February 16. 1867, under which the harbor board was organized, was construed. … The text is sustained by the following citations: Forster v. Forster, 3 Brown, Ch. 489, 493; Tew v. Earl of Winterton, 1 Ves. Jr. 451; Sugd. Vend. (7th Ed.) c. 15, pp. 633, 634, § 4; 1 Madd. Ch. Prac. 471, 472.

Greenough v. Alabama G. S. R.

64 F. 22 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · Nov 8, 1894

McDaniel, 22 Ohio St. 354 -367; Wight v. Railroad Co., 117 Mass. 226 ; Despatch Line of Packets v. Bellamy Manuf'g Co., 12 N. H. 205; Brown’s Case, 9 Ch. App. 102; Parmelee v. Hambleton, 24 Ill. 609 ; State v. … Murray, 28 Wis. 96 ; Privett v. Bickford, 26 Kan. 52 .

Western Electric Co. v. Home Tel. Co.

85 F. 649 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Feb 9, 1898

'“In the law of patents, it is the last step that wins,” says Justice Brown in The Barbed Wire Patent, 143 U. S. 275 , 12 Sup. Ct. 443, 450. … Cantrell v. Wallick, supra.

Berlin v. Jones

3 F. Cas. 267 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Dec 15, 1871

Bingham v. Cabbot, 3 Dall. [3 U. S.] 382; Abercrombie v. Dupuis, 1 Cranch, [5 U. S.] 343; Wood v. Wagnon, 2 Cranch, [6 U. S.] 9; Capron v. *268 Van Noorden, Id. 126 ; Brown v. Keene, 8 Pet. [33 U. S.] 112; Jackson v. … In Brown v. Keene, 8 Pet. [33 U. S.] 112, the petition averred that the plaintiff, Richard R.

Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Mobile

162 F. 523 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · May 2, 1907

The court, in the case of Board of Mayor, etc., v. East Tenn. Tel. … City of Knoxville v. Africa, 77 Fed. 501 , 23 C. C. A. 252 ; Board of Mayor et al. v. East Tenn. Tel. Co., supra.

Coe v. East & West R.

65 F. 16 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · Dec 10, 1894

The matter of the intervention of Frank Sullivan Smith, heretofore solicitor for Eugene Kelly and John Byrne in the main- case and in the dependent suit of Grant Bros, v. … After defending the suit of Grant Bros. v.

Montgomery County v. Cochran

116 F. 985 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama · Jul 1, 1902

Moser v. Newman, 6 Bing. 556; Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Robinson, 59 Ala. 238 ; The Paulina v. U. S., 7 Cranch, 52 , 3 L. Ed. 266 ; Rawlings v. Jennings, 13 Ves. 39; Rich v. Keyser, 54 Pa. 86 . … City of Detroit v. Detroit City R. Co. (C. C.) 54 Fed. 1 ; City of Tacoma v. Wright (C. C.) 84 Fed. 836 ; Smith v. Lumber Co. (C. C.) 46 Fed. 819 ; Hall v. Agricultural Works (C. C.) 48 Fed. 599 .

Fidelity Trust & Safety Vault Co. v. Mobile St. Ry. Co.

53 F. 850 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Jan 4, 1893

Lowenstein v. Glidewell, 5 Dill. 325 ; Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, 9 Wall. 807 ; Bowen v. Christian, 16 Fed. … Neal v. Foster, 34 Fed. Rep. 496; Rubber Co. v. Goodyear, supra; Manufacturing Co. v. Prime, 14 Blatchf. 371 ; Cross v. De Valle, 1 Wall. 1 ; 1 Story, Eq. PI. § 389; Stonemetz Printers’ Mach. Co. v. Brown Folding Mach.

United States ex rel. Andersen v. Burke

99 F. 895 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Dec 18, 1899

Holy Trinity Church v. U. S., 143 U. S. 461 , 12 Sup. Ct. 512, 36 L. Ed. 228 . … Lau Ow Bew v. U. S. 144 U. S. 59 , 12 Sup. Ct. 520, 36 L. Ed. 344 .

The Planter

19 F. Cas. 807 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Dec 15, 1874

S.] 517; Dupont de Nemours & Co. v. Vance, 19 How. [60 U. S.] 162; The Rebecca [Case No. 11, 619]; Fland. Mar. Law, § 204. … Ins. §§ 1723-1725, 1728, 1729; Hall v. Railroad Co., 13 Wall. [80 U. S.] 367; Hart v. Western R. Co., 13 Metc. [Mass.] 99; Garrison v. Memphis Ins. Co., 19 How. [60 U. S.] 317.

Atlanta Nat. Building & Loan Ass'n v. Gilmer

128 F. 293 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama · Jan 22, 1904

, keeping boarders, and collecting the board, and that their mother lived with them, and was supported by them. … Wells v. Morrow, 38 Ala. 125; Whitfield v. Riddle, 78 Ala. 99; Alston v. Marshall, 112 Ala. 638 , 20 South. 850 ; 23 A. & E. Enc. of Law, 476.

Copley v. Grover & Baker Sewing-Mach. Co.

6 F. Cas. 517 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Jun 15, 1875

Torts, 420; Ewing v. Sandford, 21 Ala. 157 . … This is usually found in a board of directors who are chosen by the members or stockholders, and this board in some way selects the officers and employés of the corporation.

Copeland v. Memphis & C. R.

6 F. Cas. 501 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · Oct 15, 1878

In Mills v. … S. v. Fisher, 2 Cranch [6 U. S.] 358; U. S. v. Palmer, 3 Wheat. [16 U. S.] 610; Com. v. Slifer, 53 Pa. St. 71.

Clews v. Lee County

5 F. Cas. 1048 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Apr 15, 1874

Mayor v. Lord, 9 Wall. [76 U. S.] 413. … In Riggs v. Johnson Co., 6 Wall. [73 U.

Henry L. Doherty & Co. v. Rice

186 F. 204 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama · Sep 6, 1910

Jenkins v. Harrison, 66 Ala. 345 ; Hooper v. S. & N. A. R. R. Co., 69 Ala. 529 ; 6 Pomeroy’s Equity Jur. §§ 769, 770; Miller v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 83 Ala. 278 , 4 South. 842 , 3 Am. St. Rep. 722 . … As said in Kessler & Co. v. Ensley Co. et al. (C.

Delano v. The Gallatin

7 F. Cas. 376 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Dec 15, 1871

Delano, the master, was not on board, but the ship was in charge of Russell, the first mate. … Co. v. Ashby and Barnard v. Adams, supra.

Lovell v. Latham & Co.

186 F. 602 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · Mar 21, 1911

Springfield Milling Co. v. Barnard et al., 81 Fed. 261 , 26 C. C. A. 389 ; Bates’ Fed. Prac. § 386. … Springfield Milling Co. v. Barnard et al., 81 Fed. 261 , 26 C. C. A. 389 ; Fidelity Trust & Safety Vault Co. v. Mobile St. Ry. Co. (C. C.) 53 Fed. 850 ; Stonemetz Printers’ Machinery Co. v. Brown Folding Machine Co. (C.

Kessler & Co. v. Ensley Co.

129 F. 397 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · Apr 15, 1904

In Davoue v. Fanning, Chancellor Kent, speaking of the Yorks Building Co. v. … Brewer v.