Case law

Brown v. Shaner

172 F.3d 927 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 15, 1999

The Supreme Court enunciated the standards for adjudging government inaction in both City of Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808 , 105 S.Ct. 2427 , 85 L.Ed.2d 791 (1985), and City of Canton, Ohio v. … In Lovelace v.

Marino v. Brown

357 F.3d 143 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Feb 12, 2004

The IRS settlement officer gave her a copy of Pierson v. … -5- appellee Brown advised her to do. Under the circumstances, we readily affirm the district court's judgment. See Skwira v.

Brown v. Fletcher

182 F. 963 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 9, 1910

Brown v. Fletcher’s Estate, 146 Mich. 401 , 109 N. W. 686 ; s. c., 210 U. S. 82 , 28 Sup. Ct. 702, 52 L. Ed. 966 ; Brown v. Fletcher (C. C.) 140 Fed. 639 . … It in substance is that the judgment in Brown v. Fletcher (C.

Brown v. Persons

122 F. 212 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 1, 1903

This rule was applied—apparently for the first time—in the case of Berd v. … Hughes v. Boone, 102 N. C. 160 , 9 S. E. 286 .

Brown v. Lensing

171 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 19, 1999

Brown, No. 96-00310 (Nov. 1, 1996) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A)). 5 142 F.3d 832 (5th Cir. 1998). 6 Id. at 835 (quoting Rodriguez v. … th 8 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(4); see also Bennett v.

Brown v. Salcido

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 20, 2026

BROWN V. … Because  BROWN V.

Brown v. Johnston

126 F.2d 727 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 26, 1942

Brown and Tom C. … Lov-vorn v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 118 F.2d 704, 707 ; Osborne v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 120 F.2d 947, 949 . Judgment affirmed.

Brown v. Bowen

845 F.2d 1211 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 9, 1988

Stunkard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 841 F.2d 57, 59 (3d Cir.1988); Doak v. Heckler, 790 F.2d 26, 28 (3d Cir.1986). … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)).

The B.V.D. Licensing Corporation v. Body Action Design, Inc.

846 F.2d 727 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Apr 28, 1988

See Coca Cola Co. v. … Brown v. Piper, 91 U.S. (1 Otto) 37, 42, 23 L.Ed. 200 (1875). To that end, dictionaries and encyclopedias may be consulted. United States v. Merck & Co., 8 Ct.Cust.Appls. 171 (1917). Fed.R. Evid. 201(b) and (f).

Brown v. Dretke

419 F.3d 365 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 29, 2005

Brown v. Estelle, 701 F.2d 494, 495 (5th Cir. 1983). Also, the petitioner must have reasonably alerted the state courts to the federal nature of the claim. Wilder v. … See Stringer v. Black, 503 U.S. 222, 232 (1992). Brown again raised an Eighth Amendment claim in his federal petition.

Brown v. Lirios

391 F. App'x 539 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 23, 2010

We draw the following account from Brown’s complaint and his appellate brief. See Holman v. Indiana, 211 F.3d 399, 405-06 (7th Cir.2000). … McGhee v. Clark, 166 F.3d 884, 886 (7th Cir.1999); accord United States v. Lemoine, 546 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir.2008); Johnpoll v. Thornburgh, 898 F.2d 849, 851 (2d Cir.1990); James v.

Brown v. Commissioner

697 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 15, 2017

Green v. Brown

398 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 29, 1968

Co. v. … United States v. L. N. White & Co., 359 F.2d 703, 711 (2d Cir. 1966). . The Commission takes no position, with regard to plaintiff’s argument based on sections 8(b) (1) and 13(a) (2). .

Wood v. Brown

104 F. 203 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Oct 9, 1900

A. clii ., 90 Fed. liii .; Catlett v. Brodie, 9 Wheat. 553 , 6 L. Ed. 158 ; Stafford v. Bank, 16 How. 135, 139 , 14 L. Ed. 876 ; Jerome v. McCarter, 21 Wall. 17 , 22 L. Ed. 515 ; Hotel Co. v. Kountze, 107 U. … Ed. 609 ; Rosenstein v. Tarr (C. C.) 51 Fed. 370 ; Tarr v. Rosenstein, 3 C. C. A. 466 , 53 Fed. 112 .

Brown v. Wainwright

785 F.2d 1457 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 17, 1986

Haber v. Wainwright, 756 F.2d 1520 (11th Cir.1985); Williams v. Brown, 609 F.2d 216, 221 (5th Cir.1980); U.S. v. Tashman, 478 F.2d 129, 131 (5th Cir.1973). The government, in this case, did not disclose. … The merits appeal is Brown v.

Hiler v. Brown

177 F.3d 542 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · May 20, 1999

See Wathen v. General Elec. Co., 115 F.3d 400 , 405 (6th Cir.1997) (finding that individual liability is prohibited under Title VII); Pritchard v. Southern Co. … In Stern v.

Timmerman v. Brown

528 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 1975

Brown, as a judicial officer, and Foard, as a prosecutor, enjoyed judicial and quasi-judicial immunity, respectively. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 , 87 S.Ct. 1213 , 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967); McCray v. … Unless there is some jurisdictional bar, Brown and Foard should be retained as parties defendant in the action and the case decided on the merits. III. 10 Before us, Brown and Foard urge the holdings in Younger v.

Tabura v. Kellogg USA

880 F.3d 544 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jan 17, 2018

EEOC v. … v.

Harvard Maintenance v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 2, 2026

Mertens v. … Co. v.

Schacht v. Brown

711 F.2d 1343 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Nov 28, 1983

SCHACHT, the Acting Director of Insurance of the State of Illinois and Liquidator of Reserve Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isadore BROWN, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 82-2088, 82-2089, 82-2090. … Nightingale, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Illinois, for Alexander Grant & Co. Raymond J. Smith, Burke & Smith, Ellen G. Robinson, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellee.