Case law

Brown v. Cranston

132 F.2d 631 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 3, 1942

Brown and Sarah A. Thompson “were occasioned * * * or contributed to” by the negligence of Ransford C. and Frank B. Thompson. … Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 , 114 A.L.R. 1487 , and Klaxon Co. v.

Brown v. Mills

639 F.3d 733 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 25, 2011

On June 19, 2009, we affirmed Brown’s conviction and sentence. United States v. Brown, Nos. 08- 5319/5402/5515 (6th Cir. June 19, 2009). … Brown relies on Castro v.

Brown v. Coumanis

135 F.2d 163 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 12, 1943

It extends and supplements the restrictions first imposed by Section 20 of the Clayton Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 52 ; United States v. Hutcheson, 312 U.S. 219 , 61 S.Ct. 463 , 85 L.Ed. 788 ; Milk Wagon Drivers Union v. … Gully v. First Natl. Bank, 299 U.S. 109 , 57 S.Ct. 96 , 81 L.Ed. 70 . And this must appear not by mere inference, but by distinct averments according to the rules of good pleading. Hull v.

Brown v. Reardon

770 F.2d 896 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Aug 19, 1985

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … In Mount Healthy City School District Board of Education v.

Uber Technologies, Inc. v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 4, 2026

It is a modern version of established workplace disclosure laws—it makes no difference whether such a disclosure occurs on bulletin boards, via distribution of employee handbooks, or in an online portal that only app-based … See CompassCare v. Hochul, 125 F.4th 49, 65 (2d Cir. 2025) (“[S]uch notice requirements are part of ‘a longstanding tradition in this country’ supported by a ‘historical warrant.’” (quoting Brown v. Ent. Merchs.

Brown v. Dickey

117 F.4th 1 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Sep 3, 2024

The court identified Cookish v. … Cady v. Walsh, 753 F.3d 348, 350 (1st Cir. 2014) (citing Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 313 (1995)).

Malik v. Brown

71 F.3d 724 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 28, 1995

Malik v. Brown, 16 F.3d 330, 335 (9th Cir.1994) (Malik I). We expressly did not reach the issue of whether defendants should be accorded qualified immunity. Id. at 335 n. 4. … The facts of this case are set out in more detail in Malik v. Brown, 16 F.3d 330, 331-32 (9th Cir.1994), mandate recalled, 65 F.3d 148 (9th Cir.1995). .

Brown v. Moore

247 F.2d 711 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jun 27, 1957

to Brown. … See Todd v. Figley, 1838, 7 Watts, Pa., 542; M’Cahan v. Hirst, 1838, 7 Watts, Pa., 175; Smith v. Seward, 1846, 3 Pa. 342 ; Reeside’s Executor v. Reeside, 1865, 49 Pa. 322 ; Zell v.

Menowitz v. Brown

991 F.2d 36 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 29, 1993

As we recently held in Walsche v. … Co. v.

Brown v. USA

227 F.3d 295 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 28, 2000

See United States v. … Consequently, Brown’s discrimination claim constitutes a claim made by a member of the “uniformed services.” The district court’s dismissal of Brown’s case is AFFIRMED. 5 In Mier v.

Furrer v. Brown

62 F.3d 1092 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 15, 1995

Brown, Dorothy J. Brown, Louis W. Fagas, and Geraldine Fagas, and by Shell Oil Company, on the Furrers’ claim brought under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6987 (1988 & Supp. … Complaint at ¶ 16, Furrer v. Brown, No. 4:93-CV-2276 (E.D.Mo. filed Oct. 22, 1993).

Kurtz v. Brown

152 F. 372 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Feb 4, 1906

It is conceded by counsel that unless the ruling of this court in Brown v. McDonald, 133 Fed. 897 , 67 C. C. A. 59 , 68 L. R. … Rep. 86 , as stated in Brown v. McDonald, supra, we heretofore found warrant to support this bill. To these we now add Marsden v. Panshall, 1 Vern. 407.

Brown v. Fauver

819 F.2d 395 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 18, 1987

Schneckloth v. … See Monks v. N.J. Parole Board, 58 N.J. 238 , 242, 277 A.2d 193 , 195 (1971); McKenna v. NJ. Highway Auth., 19 N.J. 270, 276 , 116 A.2d 29, 32 (1955).

Cella v. Brown

144 F. 742 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 8, 1906

Smith v. Sims, 77 Mo. 269 -274; Bliss on Code Pleading, 211; McCrelish v. Churchman, 4 Rawle (Pa.) 26; Moss v. Riddle & Co., 5 Cranch, 351 , 3 L. Ed. 123 ; Very v. Levy, 13 How. 345 -361, 14 L. Ed. 173 ; Marquez v. … Willard v. Tayloe, 8 Wall. 557, 571 , 19 L. Ed. 501 . As said in Trasher v. Small, 3 Mylne & Craig, 69, quoted with approval by the court in Willard v.

Parks v. Brown

840 F.2d 1496 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Mar 1, 1988

In Dutton v. Brown, 812 F.2d 593 (10th Cir.1987) (en banc), and in Coleman v. … The Supreme Court recently con *1505 fronted an “anti-sympathy” instruction in California v. Brown, supra.

Brown v. Trench

787 F.2d 167 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Apr 7, 1986

Brown contends that adoption of these personnel procedures gave her a property interest in her job. State law determines whether such a property interest exists. See Board of Regents v. … However, we do agree with the court below that Abraham v. Pekarski supports the claim that Brown had a property interest.

Arensman v. Brown

430 F.2d 190 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 30, 1970

In Hoffman v. … In Kenney v.

Brown v. Routzahn

63 F.2d 914 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 17, 1933

Section 10572, Ohio General Code; Carder v. Board of Com’rs of Fayette County, 16 Ohio St. 354 , 357. Next, there is no law in Ohio limiting the time in which a do.nee may reject or aeeept a testamentary gift. … Strom v. Wood, supra; Crumpler v. Barfield & Wilson Co., 114 Ga. 570 , 40 S. E. 808 ; Schoonover v. Osborne, 193 Iowa, 474 , 187 N. W. 20 , 27 A. L.

Brown v. Nutsch

619 F.2d 758 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 18, 1980

McCurry v. Allen, 606 F.2d 795, 799 (8th Cir. 1980), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1012 , 62 L.Ed.2d 751 (1980). See also Florida State Board of Dentistry v. … Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 , 92 S.Ct. 594, 596 , 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), we are still unable to find that Brown states a cause of action that would entitle him to relief. Brown v. Nutsch, No. 79-1753, is affirmed.

Kunkel v. Brown

99 F. 593 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 6, 1900

Brown against Mary E. Kunkel. The canse of action is the statutory liability of the said Mary E. Kunkel as stockholder in the Western Farm Mortgage Company. … After quoting Gaines v. Fuentes, 92 U.