Case law

Brown v. First Nat. Bank of Newton

112 F. 901 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 7, 1902

In Rogers v. … Howarth, 3 Mer. 272; Mayhew v. Crickett, 2 Swanst. 185; Hawkshaw v. Parkins, Id. 539; Eyre v. Everett, 2 Russ. 382; Mackintosh v. Wyatt, 3 Hare, 567; Moore v. Bowmaker, 6 Taunt. 379; Philpot v. Briant, 4 Bing. 717.

United States v. Brown

91 F. App'x 585 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 22, 2004

MEMORANDUM ** A jury convicted Defendant Sandra Kay Brown of conspiracy to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846, and money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C … See McCormick v. United States, 500 U.S. 257 , 270 n. 8, 111 S.Ct. 1807 , 114 L.Ed.2d 307 (1991) (holding that an appellate court may not affirm conviction on a new theory not presented to the jury).

Brown v. North Carolina

341 U.S. 943 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 28, 1951

Deutscher Tennis Bund v. Atp Tour, Inc.

610 F.3d 820 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jun 25, 2010

Brown, 5 F.3d at 669; see NCAA v. Bd. of Regents, 468 U.S. 85, 109 n.39. … Brown, 5 F.3d at 669; see also Cal.

Brown v. United States

138 F. App'x 87 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jun 21, 2005

United States v. Brown, 314 F.3d 1216 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1223 (2003). In support of his § 2255 application to the district court, Mr. Brown asserted ineffective assistance of trial counsel. … Bey v. United States, 399 F.3d 1266, 1268 (10th Cir. 2005). In Leonard v.

United States v. Daniel Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 5, 2019

Under these circumstances, Brown had no obligation to stop and speak to an officer. See Florida v. … BROWN Second, to help explain why the result here is different from that in Illinois v.

Brown v. Pennsylvania

391 U.S. 921 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 20, 1968

United States v. Brown

573 F.2d 84 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · May 3, 1978

S. v. Brown * No. 77-5670 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 5/3/78 1 M.D.Fla. 2 AFFIRMED *** * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v.

Brown v. Slim Fast Foods, Inc

109 F.3d 772 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Feb 18, 1997

109 F.3d 772 Brown v. Slim Fast Foods, Inc. NO. 96-8453 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Feb 18, 1997 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. , No. 93-02719-1-CV-HTW 2 REVERSED IN PART, VACATED IN PART.

Kelley v. Railroad Retirement Board

180 F.2d 580 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 20, 1950

Brown v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp.

331 F.2d 246 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 15, 1964

Co. v. … Co. v. Arthur, 220 F. 843 (6th Cir. 1915), and Title Guar. & Sur. Co. v. Witmire, 194 F. 41 (6th Cir. 1912). .

Adams v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

83 F.3d 436 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 2, 1996

83 F.3d 436 Adams v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. * NO. 95-2510 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

95 F.2d 184 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 11, 1938

Brown should not be so transferred. … See Yuengling v. Commissioner, 3 Cir., 69 F.2d 971 .

Brown v. United States

476 U.S. 1157 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 2, 1986

Certiorari is granted limited to the following question: “In cases pending on direct appeal, should the holding in Batson v. Kentucky, ante, p. 79, be given retroactive effect?” … Case is set *1158 for oral argument in tandem with No. 85-5221, Griffith v. Kentucky, immediately supra.

United States v. George E. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 23, 2007

. 6 Brown also complains about Detective Rataj lying about checking with the utilities board to confirm that he lived at 1704 Ford Street. … United States v. Williams, 486 F.3d 377, 383 (8th Cir. 2007). Brown cites United States v. Brisbane, 367 F.3d 910 (D.C.

Diamond Stone-Sawing Mach. Co. v. Brown

166 F. 306 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 15, 1908

It is said that the opinion in Rude v. Westcott, if not interpreted as the complainant contends, is obiter. … Paraphrasing the rule of Rude v.

United States v. Brown

583 F.2d 540 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 12, 1978

S. v. Brown * # No. 78-1317 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 10/12/78 1 N.D.Ala. AFFIRMED * Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. … Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409 # Local Rule 21 case; see NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966 .

Richard L. Brown v. United States

73 F.3d 1110 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Dec 19, 1995

Brown v. U.S. NO. 94-2983 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Dec 19, 1995 M.D.Fla., 70 F.3d 124 1 DENIALS OF REHEARING EN BANC.

Brown, Vivian v. Family Dollar Stores

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 15, 2008

v. … In fact, the evidence presented here is similar to evid- ence recently considered sufficient by the Eleventh Circuit in Allen v. Board of Public Educ. for Bibb Cty., 495 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Brown

578 F.2d 871 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 10, 1978

S. v. Brown No. 77-5607 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 8/10/78 M.D.La., 574 F.2d 1274