Case law

Brown v. United States

276 U.S. 134 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 20, 1928

In Hale v. Henkel, 201 U. … The question is ruled, not by Hale v. Henkel , but by Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Vermont, 207 U. S. 541, 553-554 , and Wheeler v. United States, 226 U. S. 478, 482-483, 489 .

Brown v. United States

256 U.S. 335 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 16, 1921

Rowe v. United States, 164 U. S. 546, 558 . The law of Texas very strongly adopts these views as is shown by many cases, of which it is enough to cite two. Cooper v. State, 49 Tex. Crim. Rep. 28, 38. Baltrip v. … It denies that Hermes had a knife and even that Brown was acting in self-defence.

United Transportation Union-Illinois Legislative Board v. Surface Transportation Board

169 F.3d 474 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 25, 1999

Bankers Life and Casualty Co. v. United States, 142 F.3d 973, 983 (7th Cir.1998); see also Ass’n of American Railroads v. … United States v. Bank of Farmington, 166 F.3d 853, 865 (7th Cir.1999). Leasing is in common parlance a form of “acquisition,” cf. Wisconsin Central Limited v.

Barbour v. International Union

640 F.3d 599 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 27, 2011

On appeal, the Brown court reversed. … First-Served Defendant Rule In Brown v.

Brown v. San Bernardino Cnty.

140 S. Ct. 2823 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 26, 2020

United States v. Brown

640 F.2d 385 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 5, 1981

S. v. Brown 79-5171 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 3/5/81 N.D.Ga., 634 F.2d 819

Brown v. Triton Security

158 F. App'x 489 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 28, 2005

Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration and to “Subpoena Case and Employment Records.” … . § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 , 69 S.Ct. 1221 , 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949).

Texas Co. v. Brown

258 U.S. 466 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 24, 1922

This decision is in line with the previous cases of Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123, 140 , and Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622, 632-634 ; and it was pointed out that their authority was not overruled by Leisy v. … Brown v. Houston , and American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, supra, sustain the power of a State to impose property taxes upon goods brought from another State, after they have come to rest in the taxing State.

Reter v. Railroad Retirement Board

465 F.3d 896 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Oct 23, 2006

See 45 U.S.C. § 231a(a)(1)(v). The Railroad Retirement Board denied his claim. He appealed and we affirm. Mr. … In any event, neither the hearing officer nor the Board was required to accept Dr. Debush's findings, which differed from those of another qualified physician. See Bowman v. Railroad Ret.

Brown v. North Carolina

434 U.S. 998 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 12, 1977

Perkins v. Mobile Housing Board

847 F.2d 735 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jun 20, 1988

847 F.2d 735 Jeanette PERKINS, on behalf of herself and all persons similarly situated, Annette Petite and Kizzie Leatherwood, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. … MOBILE HOUSING BOARD, James Alexander, individually and in his capacity as Executive Director of Mobile Housing Board, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-7744. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Brown v. Mich. Dep't of Corr. Parole Bd.

83 U.S.L.W. 3856 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 18, 2015

California ex rel. Brown v. Safeway, Inc.

633 F.3d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 11, 2011

Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.

61 F.4th 1350 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Mar 6, 2023

It is within the discretion of the Board to weigh the evidence of record. Tiger Lily Ven- tures Ltd. v. Barclays Cap. Inc., 35 F.4th 1352, 1365−66 (Fed. Cir. 2022); see also Shoes by Firebug LLC v. … See also Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semi- conductor Components Indus., LLC, 926 F.3d 1306, 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (“[N]onprecedential Board decisions . . . do not even bind other panels of the Board.”).

David Pickup v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 2014

PICKUP V. BROWN 23 In Welch v. … BROWN 31 decision: National Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis v. California Board of Psychology (“NAAP”), 228 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir. 2000), and Conant v.

Brown v. Van Braam

3 U.S. 344 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 13, 1797

In Re Robert N. Brown and Barbara Bex Brown, Debtors. Barbara Bex Brown v. Virginia M. Dellinger, Individually and D/B/A Dellinger Art & Antiques

734 F.2d 119 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 9, 1984

First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Rochester v. Brown, 86 A.D.2d 963, 963 , 448 N.Y.S.2d 302, 303 (4th Dep’t 1982) (“First Federal II’). … See also Segal v.

United States v. Brian L. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jun 10, 2008

In Maryland v. … See Fields v.

Brown v. Fletcher's Estate

210 U.S. 82 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 18, 1908

Vaughan v. Northrup, 15 Pet. 1 ; Aspden v. Nixon, 4 How. 467 ; Stacy, Adm’r, v. Thrasher, 6 How. 44 . … Low v.

Cerezo v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 14, 2008

CEREZO v. … Cerezo then filed two notices of appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), both received by the BIA on May 9, 2005.