Case law

Moore Brothers Co v. Brown & Root Inc

207 F.3d 717 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 30, 2000

Board of Supervisors v. Southern Cross Coal Corp., 238 Va. 91 , 380 S.E.2d 636, 638 (1989) (quoting Southwood Builders, Inc. v. Peerless Ins., 235 Va. 164 , 366 S.E.2d 104, 107 (1988)). … V.

Brown v. United States

659 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 29, 1981

659 F.2d 1075 Brown v. U. S. 80-1163 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 9/29/81 N.D.Tex., 653 F.2d 196

Brown v. Secretary of Air For

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 23, 2000

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ELLIOTT ROY BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Brown's state law claims, finding them barred by the Rooker- Feldman doctrine, which provides that federal courts lack jurisdiction to hear claims adjudicated by state courts. See Rooker v.

Reading Co. v. Brown

391 U.S. 471 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 3, 1968

The same day, the District Court appointed a receiver, Francis Shunk Brown, a respondent here. … Co. v. Bloom, 164 U. S. 636 ; Bereth v. Sparks, 51 F. 2d 441 ; §77 (n), 11 U. S.

Texas Co. v. Brown

258 U.S. 466 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 24, 1922

This decision is in line with the previous cases of Woodruff v. Parham, 8 Wall. 123, 140 , and Brown v. Houston, 114 U. S. 622, 632-634 ; and it was pointed out that their authority was not overruled by Leisy v. … Brown v. Houston , and American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed, supra, sustain the power of a State to impose property taxes upon goods brought from another State, after they have come to rest in the taxing State.

Brown v. City Of South Burlington

393 F.3d 337 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 29, 2004

BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … See, e.g., Oubre v.

United States v. Brown

640 F.2d 385 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 5, 1981

S. v. Brown 79-5171 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit 3/5/81 N.D.Ga., 634 F.2d 819

David Pickup v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 29, 2014

PICKUP V. BROWN 23 In Welch v. … BROWN 31 decision: National Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis v. California Board of Psychology (“NAAP”), 228 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir. 2000), and Conant v.

Newman v. Beard

617 F.3d 775 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 16, 2010

See Sandin v. … Mickens-Thomas v. Vaughn, 355 F.3d 294, 307 (3d Cir. 2004) (“Mickens-Thomas II”) (“Even though the Board did not specify [§ 9718.1], there is no question that the Board’s new requirement commits . . .

McCormick & Co. v. Brown

286 U.S. 131 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 16, 1932

State v. Muncey, 28 W. Va. 494 ; State v. Good, 56 W. Va. 215 ; 49 S. E. 121 ; State v. Durr, 69 W. Va. 251 ; 71 S. E. 767 ; State v. Henry, 74 W. Va. 72; 81 S. E. 569 . … Eberle v. Michigan, supra; Kidd v. Pearson, 128 U. S. 1, 19 ; Rippey v. Texas, 193 U. S. 504, 509 ; Crane v. Campbell, 245 U. S. 304, 307 ; Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, supra.

Brown v. Van Braam

3 U.S. 344 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 13, 1797

Brown v. North Carolina

434 U.S. 998 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 12, 1977

United Transportation Union-Illinois Legislative Board v. Surface Transportation Board

169 F.3d 474 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 14, 1999

169 F.3d 474 UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-ILLINOIS LEGISLATIVE BOARD, Petitioner, v. … Union-Ill. v.

Vaughns v. Board of Education

770 F.2d 1244 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 22, 1985

While a contingency fee is to be reserved for the case producing exceptional success, see Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 , 104 S.Ct. 1541, 1548 , 79 L.Ed.2d 891 (1984); Murray v. … Vaughns v. Board of Education of Prince George’s County, 598 F.Supp. 1262, 1286 (D.Md.1984). AFFIRMED.

Thompson v. School Board

498 F.2d 195 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 31, 1974

Certainly if the choice to transport only black students in grades 3 to 5, made by a school board which historically has demonstrated its unwillingness to bring itself into compliance with Brown, was non-discriminatory, the

Turner v. Brown

516 U.S. 997 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 27, 1995

United States v. Brown

105 F. App'x 939 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 12, 2004

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, see Jackson v. … See Corey v.

United States v. Darnell Brown, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 25, 2008

Compare United States v. … See also United States v.

Mitchell v. Merit Systems Protection Board

741 F.3d 81 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jan 15, 2014

Making that “legal determination” de novo, Roy v. … But under the Board’s suggestion, someone who spends twenty years in one permanent position and then ten months in a “similar,” permanent position before being terminated, see, e.g., Mathis v.

Lahr v. National Transportation Safety Board

569 F.3d 964 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 22, 2009

The NTSB’s investigation was, in its words, “by far the most expensive and the most extensive in the history of the Board.” … See Castaneda v.