Case law

Mendoza v. Brown

522 U.S. 937 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Oct 20, 1997

Western Coal Traffic League,petitioners v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Intervenors

216 F.3d 1168 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 14, 2000

Given the Board’s “special cognizance” over the railroad industry, National Motor Freight Traffic Ass’n v. … Fruit Growers Ass'n v. Martin, 968 F.2d 1265, 1272 (D.C.Cir.1992); see also Forester v. Consumer Prod.

Brown v. Zerbst

99 F.2d 745 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 4, 1938

Tramp v. United States, 8 Cir., 86 F.2d 82 , and cases cited. … Patton v. United States, 281 U.S. 276 , 50 S.Ct. 253 , 74 L.Ed. 854 , 70 A.L.R. 263 . The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Bilbrey v. Brown

738 F.2d 1462 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 2, 1984

Gartner, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Garland BROWN, Ben Gano, Robert Hansen, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 81-3008. … In Board of Curators v.

Brown v. Neeb

644 F.2d 551 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 3, 1981

See also King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. … In Teamsters v.

Coleman v. Brown

802 F.2d 1227 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Sep 30, 1986

In Knowles v. … California v. Brown, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2274 , 90 L.Ed.2d 717 (1986). Although a similar instruction was given in the instant case, R. VII, 993, we cannot consider this issue.

Brown v. Baden

815 F.2d 575 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 22, 1987

Hutto v. Davis, 454 U.S. 370, 375 , 102 S.Ct. 703, 706 , 70 L.Ed.2d 556 (1982). See Sears, 785 F.2d at 780-81 ; United States v. Yagid, 528 F.2d 962, 965 (2d Cir.1976). See also 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1982). … Sears, 785 F.2d 777 ; United States v. Alverson, 666 F.2d 341 (9th Cir. 1982); United States v. Wolfson, 634 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir.1980); United States v. Fer *577 guson, 624 F.2d 81 (9th Cir.1980); United States v.

Davoll v. Brown

7 F. Cas. 197 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1845

Grant v. Raymond, 6 Pet. [31 U. S.] 218. See, also, Ames v. Howard [Case No. 326]; Wyeth v. Stone, [Id. 18,107]; Blanchard v. Sprague [Id. 1,518]. … McFarlane v. Price, 1 Starkie, 199; Rex v. Cutler, Id. 354; Wyeth v. Stone [Case No. 18,107]; Blanchard v. Sprague [Case No. 1,518]; Ames v. Howard [supra]; 11 East, 101.

Brown v. Bowen

845 F.2d 1211 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · May 2, 1988

Stunkard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 841 F.2d 57, 59 (3d Cir.1988); Doak v. Heckler, 790 F.2d 26, 28 (3d Cir.1986). … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206, 216 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)).

Joseph Brown v. Sage

941 F.3d 655 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 30, 2019

BROWN, Appellant v. … Brown v. United States (“Brown I”), No. 1:11-cv-01562, which the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California dismissed in June 2013 for failure to state a claim. 2. Brown v.

Parks v. Brown

860 F.2d 1545 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Oct 28, 1988

Parks v. Brown, 840 F.2d 1496 (10th Cir.1987). This court agreed to a rehearing en banc, and we now reverse. … See, e.g., Chaney v. Brown, 699 P.2d 159 (Okla. Crim.App.1985); Johnson v. State, 665 P.2d 815, 826-27 (Okla.Crim.App.1982).

Brown v. Potter

285 F. App'x 421 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 10, 2008

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Brown’s constructive termination claim because Brown did not exhaust her administrative remedies as to that claim. See Ong v. … Further, Brown’s contentions regarding her counsel’s performance are unavailing because “[generally, a plaintiff in a civil case has no right to effective assistance of counsel.” Nicholson v.

Richard A. Linville, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans Affairs

165 F.3d 1382 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jan 26, 1999

v. … See Linville v. West, 11 Vet.App. 60 (1998).

Board of Education of Kiefer v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.

41 F.2d 989 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Apr 5, 1930

Cromer v. Brown

88 F.3d 1315 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 15, 1996

In this case, Sheriff Brown did not cede his exclusive authority, but he did permit the Grievance Board to make a recommendation. 14 III. … Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 (1968).

Timmerman v. Brown

528 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 15, 1975

Brown, as a judicial officer, and Foard, as a prosecutor, enjoyed judicial and quasi-judicial immunity, respectively. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 , 87 S.Ct. 1213 , 18 L.Ed.2d 288 (1967); McCray v. … Unless there is some jurisdictional bar, Brown and Foard should be retained as parties defendant in the action and the case decided on the merits. III. Before us, Brown and Foard urge the holdings in Younger v.

Baskin v. Brown

174 F.2d 391 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 17, 1949

v. … Brown v. Baskin, D. C., 80 F.Supp. 1017 .

Brown v. McDonald

130 F. 964 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Jun 23, 1904

In Rindskopf v. Platto (C. … In Patton v.

Shima v. Brown

133 F.2d 48 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 18, 1943

Sibbach v. Wilson & Co., Inc., 312 U.S. 1 , 61 S.Ct. 422 , 85 L.Ed. 479 . D.C.Code 1940, §§ 28—2707, 28—2708, 31 Stat. 1378 . Fries, Beall & Sharp Co. v. Livingstone, 56 App.D.C. 209 , 12 F.2d 150 . … New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad Co. v. Estill, 147 U.S. 591, 622, 623 , 13 S.Ct. 444, 456 , 37 L.Ed. 292 .

Amir Al-Dabagh v. Case Western Reserve Univ.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 28, 2015

See Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd., 614 N.E.2d 748 (Ohio 1993) (affirming a medical board’s decision to suspend a doctor after he had sex with an emotionally vulnerable patient). … Halpern v. Wake Forest Univ. Health Scis., 669 F.3d 454, 463 (4th Cir. 2012). Refusing to approve a Ph.D. thesis because its acknowledgement section was unprofessional is “academic,” says another. Brown v.