Case law

Brown v. Dart

876 F.3d 939 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 5, 2017

Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S 384, 387, 127 S.Ct. 1091 , 166 L.Ed.2d 973 (2007). Under Illinois law, a plaintiff has two years to bring a § 1983 claim. 735 ILCS 5/13-202; Gekas v. … Second, Brown argues that his claim could not accrue until the court had corrected his release date. In Heck v.

Fontana v. H O V G L L C

989 F.3d 338 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 26, 2021

Brown v. Van Ru Credit Corp., 804 F.3d 740, 742 (6th Cir. 2015). … Brown, 804 F.3d at 742. The Seventh and Tenth Circuits have also agreed that “a debt collector’s message must at least imply the existence of a debt to meet the Act’s definition of ‘communication.’” Lavallee v.

Antonellis v. United States

723 F.3d 1328 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jul 18, 2013

US 9 Board for the Correction of Military Records, see 10 U.S.C. § 1552, at least where a special selection board has been convened pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 628. See generally Porter v. … Richey v. United States, 322 F.3d 1317, 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2003). In such cases, if the Corrections Board refuses 10 JAMES ANTONELLIS v.

National Labor Relations Board v. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal Government

788 F.3d 537 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 9, 2015

In San Manuel, the Board noted three exceptions to the Tuscarora princi- *542 pie, which were first enumerated by the Ninth Circuit in Donovan v. … Moreover, federal Indian law and policy are areas over which the Board has no particular expertise, and so we need not defer to the Board’s conclusions with respect to them. Cf. Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v.

Brown v. Halpin

885 F.3d 111 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 15, 2018

Bolmer v. Oliveira , 594 F.3d 134 , 140-41 (2d Cir. 2010) ; Hill v. City of New York , 45 F.3d 653 , 660 (2d Cir. 1995). … App. 414; see D'Angelo v.

Brown v. Ellis

86 F. 357 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · Mar 4, 1898

Sparhawk v. Buell’s Adm’r, 9 Vt. 74 ; Brown v. Sumner’s Estate, 31 Vt. 671 . In Holmes v. … Williams v. Benedict,, 8 How. 107 , and Yonley v.

Johnson v. Brown

681 F. App'x 494 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 17, 2017

See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974); Scruggs v. Jordan, 485 F.3d 934, 939 (7th Cir. 2007); Piggie v. Cotton (Piggie II), 344 F.3d 674, 677 (7th Cir. 2003). … .” *497 Piggie v. McBride (Piggie I), 277 F.3d 922, 925 (7th Cir. 2002).

Brown v. Artman

166 F. 485 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1908

Davis v. Stevens, 17 Blatchf. 255 , Fed. Cas. No. 3,653; Borland v. Haven (C. C.) 37 Fed. 394 ; Ohio Valley Bank v. Hulitt, 204 U. S. 162 , 27 Sup. Ct. 179, 51 L. Ed. 423 ; McDonald, Receiver v. Dewey, 202 U.

Brown v. Astrue

611 F.3d 941 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 26, 2010

. § 404.1527(e)(1); Stormo v. … Compare Hutsell v.

Brown v. Huey

166 F. 483 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1908

The cases referred to are Brown, Receiver, v. McDonald, 133 Fed. 897 , 67 C. C. A. 59 , 68 L. R. A. 462, Kurtz v. Brown, 152 Fed. 372 , 81 C. C. A. 498 , and Brown, Receiver, v. Palmer (C. C.) 157 Fed. 797 . … As was said in Orr v. Diaper, 4 Ch. Div. 92: “The proceedings have come to a deadlock, and it would be a denial of justice if means could not be found in this court to assist the plaintiffs.”

Whitlock v. Brown

596 F.3d 406 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Feb 24, 2010

See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 , 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978). Brown disputes this and also argues he is entitled to qualified immunity. … See United States v. Sims, 551 F.3d 640, 645 (7th Cir.2008) (citing United States v.

Traver v. Brown

62 F. 933 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · Jul 31, 1894

Dunlap v. Schofield, 152 U. S. 244 , 14 Sup. Ct. 576. In this case the orator has alleged marking the articles “Patented,” “according to the statute,” without alleging actual notice of the patent or of the infringement.

Brown v. Arnold

127 F. 387 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Jan 6, 1904

Egan v. Rooney, 38 How. Prac. 121 ; Lusk v. Hastings, 1 Hill, 659 ; McLain v. Watkins, 43 Ill. 24 ; Test v. Larsh, 98 Ind. 301 ; White v. Johnson, 67 Mc. 287; Clark v. McGregor, 55 Mich. 412 , 21 N. W. 866 ; Jackson v. … Most certainly the judge did not expect that when counsel obtained a stipulation he should consign it to some unmapped potter’s field, without head or foot board, and that the court should be required to become the angel

Shaw v. Briscoe

526 F.2d 675 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 2, 1976

. § 1983 challenging the constitutionality of various procedures of the state parole board. … See Leonard v. Mississippi State Probation and Parole Bd., 509 F.2d 820, 823-24 (5th Cir. 1975). .

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. Ouimet Corp.

630 F.2d 4 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Aug 29, 1980

Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guar. Corp., 596 F.2d at 963. … PBGC v. Tenn-ERO Corp., No. 76-1314 (D.Mass.

Alsager v. Board of Osteopathic Medicine & Surgery

573 F. App'x 619 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 16, 2014

OPOOOO1485, Plaintiff - Appellant, MEMORANDUM* v. BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE AND SURGERY, a Washington State Agency; et al., Defendants - Appellees. … Moreover, Alsager can seek a stay of any adverse Board decision pending appeal, which would allow him to litigate his constitutional claims before the Board’s decision takes effect. See Wash. Rev.

Brown v. Barrow

512 F.3d 1304 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jan 11, 2008

Without an administrative appellate procedure for Board decisions, the appropriate method by which a prisoner can attack a Board decision is to file a petition for a writ of mandamus against the Board. Johnson v. … See Lewis v. Griffin, 258 Ga. 887, 376 S.E.2d 364 (1989); Justice v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles, 234 Ga. 749, 218 S.E.2d 45 (1975).

Lilly Mae Onie Lee Whitelaw Hilliard v. John L. Williams

465 F.2d 1212 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Nov 20, 1972

Lewis v. Brautigam, 227 F.2d 124, 129 (5th Cir. 1955). In McCray v. … (Footnotes omitted) To like effect see: Madison v. Purdy, 410 F.2d 99, 101 (5th Cir. 1969); Robi-chaud v. Ronan, 351 F.2d 533 (9th Cir. 1965). Cf. Lucarell v. NcNair, 453 F.2d 836 (6th Cir. 1972); Lynch v.

Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco

111 F.3d 896 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 28, 1997

111 F.3d 896 Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco *** NO. 96-2941 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Brown v. Brown County Circuit Court

538 F. App'x 258 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 14, 2013

PER CURIAM: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … See Brown v. Brown Cnty. Circuit Court, No. 1:13-cv-01277-ELH, 2013 WL 1870770 (D.Md. filed May 1, 2013; entered May 2, 2013). We grant *259 Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis.