Case law

Tarlock Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

771 F.3d 647 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Nov 13, 2014

Singh appealed the IJ’s decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board), and the Board dismissed Singh’s appeal, making Singh subject to an administratively final order of removal. See Ocampo v. … Next, the Board reasoned that, although Yauri had filed a motion to reopen and continue her  SINGH V.

Nutter v. Brown

96 F. 229 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jul 28, 1899

BROWN, District Judge. This suit is for infringement of letters patent No. 491,012, issued January 31, 1893, to Lewis E. Erieson, for a bicycle bell.

Brown v. French

80 F. 166 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · Apr 13, 1897

In the case of Barber v. … In City of Boston v.

Hebert v. Brown

65 F. 2 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Minnesota · Jan 7, 1895

Brown, with covenants of warranty, on the land upon which hi' had made his pre-emption claim, to secure two promissory notes payable to the order of Brown of even date, one for 8(100 due in (10, and the other for 8500 due … When Brown took the mortgage for security, he knew that. Leveque had no tille to, hut had simply filed a pre-emption claim on, the land.

Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.

789 F.3d 1292 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 16, 2015

See Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc., IPR2012-00026 and IPR2013-00109, Paper No. 73 (PTAB Feb. 19, 2014) (“Board Decision”). … The Board then concluded that claims 1, MICROSOFT CORPORATION v.

Local Union No. 948, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, (Ibew), Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

697 F.2d 113 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 27, 1982

We will set aside the Board’s determination of credibility only where its resolution is unreasonable. NLRB v. … Although this court will not substitute its judgment for that of the Board, NLRB v.

Brown Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. Chapman

814 F.3d 447 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 19, 2016

See Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 653 (1979); see also Whren v. United No. 15-3506 Brown v. Chapman, et al. … Board of Cty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).

Brown v. Colvin

661 F. App'x 894 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 15, 2016

demonstrate exceptional circumstances to merit the “extraordinary remedy” of relief under that rule, Banks v. … Co. v. Cent. Laborers’ Pension Fund, 704 F.3d 522, 527 (7th Cir. 2013).

Walker v. Brown

86 F. 364 · U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · Jul 15, 1897

Brown, and to ask for the recognition of an equitable lien on the bonds in her hands. Bank v. Ayers, 160 U. S. 660 , 16 Sup. Ct. 412. … Brown, and therefore subject to such lien, if any attached to them, in the hands of Brown?”

Magill v. Brown

16 F. Cas. 408 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1833

[Gibbons v. Ogden] 9 Wheat. [22 U. S.] 207; [Brown v. State of Maryland] 12 Wheat. [25 U. S.] 436-438. … Leg. 140, and cases cited; [Inglis v. Trustees of Sailors’ Snug Harbor] 3 Pet. [28 U. S.] 119; 1 Atk. 469; 3 Brown, Ch. 528; 7 Ves. 69, 86.

Brown v. Callahan

623 F.3d 249 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 7, 2010

Brown v. Miller, 519 F.3d 231, 236 (5th Cir. 2008). … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997).

Brown v. Zaubitz

105 F. 242 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Dec 10, 1900

Deering v. Harvesting Works, 155 U. S. 286, 300 , 15 Sup. Ct. 118, 39 L. Ed. 153 .

Watson v. Department of the Navy

262 F.3d 1292 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 17, 2001

Dep’t of Navy, 81 M.S.P.R. 450 (1999); Hamilton v. … Id. at 321 ; see also Ellis v.

Machesney v. Brown

29 F. 145 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · Nov 26, 1886

Shaw, 16 Mass. 42 ; Fullam v. Inhabitants of West Brookfield, 91 Mass. 1 ; Townsend v. Hubbard, 4 Hill, 351 ; Kiersted v. Orange & A. R. Co., 69 N. Y. 343 . … The remarks of Story, J., in Clarke v. Courtney, 5 Pet. 350 , are apposite: “The act does not purport to be the act of the principals, but of the attorney. It is his deed and his seal, and not theirs.

Rasanen v. Brown

723 F.3d 325 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 19, 2013

O’Bert v. … See Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 (1983) (explaining that probable cause does not demand that officer’s good-faith belief “be correct or more likely true than false”); see also Penley v.

Perry v. Brown

671 F.3d 1052 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 7, 2012

See Perry v. Brown, 52 Cal.4th 1116 , 134 Cal.Rptr.3d 499 , 265 P.3d 1002 (2011). … Brown, Jr., refused to pursue the appeal. Id. at 26 n. 1, 36-38, 94 S.Ct. 2655 . . Cf. City of Los Angeles v.

Brown v. Watters

599 F.3d 602 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 19, 2010

Brown’s claims are procedurally defaulted. See Lewis v. … See Ford v.

Cruz v. Maloney

152 F. App'x 1 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Oct 21, 2005

See Commonwealth v. … See Simpson v.

Brown v. Dart

876 F.3d 939 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 5, 2017

Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S 384, 387, 127 S.Ct. 1091 , 166 L.Ed.2d 973 (2007). Under Illinois law, a plaintiff has two years to bring a § 1983 claim. 735 ILCS 5/13-202; Gekas v. … Second, Brown argues that his claim could not accrue until the court had corrected his release date. In Heck v.

Brown v. Tillinghast

84 F. 71 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · Dec 31, 1897

In the case of Matthews v. … As to all the questions considered and passed upon in the case of Matthews v. Bank I now adhere to and follow the ruling in that case.