Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersF

10,000+ results

1.17s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Brown

    375 U.S. 962 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 6, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Douglas M. Wright v. United States Postal Service

    183 F.3d 1328 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 15, 1999

    See Grubka v. … Jackson v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Hyman v. Brown

    927 F.3d 639 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 2019

    Hyman v. Brown , 197 F. Supp. 3d at 462 . … See Hyman v. Brown, 197 F.

    Cited 98 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Leete

    2 F. 440 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · Mar 15, 1880

    Brown v. McKinney, 9 Watt. 565. Occupation, up to a recognized line, for 15 years, would establish it as the division line. Clark v. Tabor, 28 Vt. 222; Angel on Lim. § 393. … So in Phelps v. Henry, 15 Ark. 297 , the possession which will not ripen into title is said, to be one held without title or claim, of right, and only in ignorance of the true boundary. Also in Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Munal v. Brown

    70 F. 967 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · Nov 30, 1895

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Jesse J. Smith

    240 F.3d 732 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jan 26, 2001

    See United States v. Brown, 148 F.3d at 1008. … United States v. Brown, 148 F.3d at 1008.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Blanchard v. Brown

    3 F. Cas. 621 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1849

    in violation of common sense and of the spirit of the decision of the supreme court of Pennsylvania which refused to extend the privilege in the case of special juries further than the letter of the act required, Shwenk v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Cameron-Brown Co.

    652 F.2d 375 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 18, 1981

    Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U.S. 26 , 45—46, 96 S.Ct. 1917, 1927-28 , 48 L.Ed.2d 450 (1976); Warth v. … In support of their argument, defendants rely on Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 , 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388-89 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). The district court also relied on Van Bronkhorst v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Department of Health & Human Services

    834 F.3d 1361 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 22, 2016

    On various dates in 2015, veteran John Paul Jones, III, filed sixteen appeals with the Merit Systems Protec- tion Board (“MSPB”), alleging that the U.S. … (“Our jurisdiction to hear the appeal was, in effect, sus- pended until” the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences became final. (footnote omitted)); accord Craker v.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Jacqueline Tensing v. National Labor Relations Board

    519 F.2d 365 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 28, 1975

    Petitioners seek review of the refusal of the NLRB’s General Counsel to issue a complaint on charges filed before the Board. The Board has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. … We have held previously that district courts may not review the refusal of the Board’s General Counsel to investigate or to file a complaint concerning unfair labor practice charges, Mayer v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Finn

    34 F. 124 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · Mar 6, 1888

    Brown was bound to know what took place at the meetings of the board of directors, of which he was a member, and that when he agreed to sell Mr. Brockett seventy-five shares he knew that Mr. … Merchants’ Bank v. Rudolf, 5 Neb. 527 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Watson-Rummell Electric Company

    815 F.2d 29 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 1987

    The specificity required for a claim to escape the ban imposed by § 10(e) is that which will “apprise the Board of an intention to bring up the question.” May Stores v. … Under Jim McNeff, Inc. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Novoselsky v. Brown

    822 F.3d 342 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 10, 2016

    and Board of Commissioners. … Horwitz v. Board of Educ. of Avoca School Dist. No. 37, 260 F.3d 602, 617 (7th Cir.2001), quoting Klug, 197 F.3d at 861.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Howell v. Brown

    5 Indian Terr. 718 · Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · Oct 19, 1904

    board 5 months at $10). 50 00 Chandler (for boai’d 10 months at $10). 100 00 Solomon Harnatubbi (for board 2 months at $10.00). 20 00 Milton Brown, attending J. … Will Gattis (for board 2 months at $10.00). 20 00 Mrs. Farris (board 2 months at $10.00). 20 00 “Stonewall, I. T., May 12th, 1892. Mr. Milton Brown: Sir: Enclosed find your account against Joe H.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dunbar v. Brown

    7 F. Cas. 1186 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · Jul 15, 1846

    Brown until three months after the expiration of the year, at which time he proposed to give property in security for payment. … Brown, and give notice to the defendant that it was not paid.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Smith

    88 F. 565 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · Jun 4, 1898

    Price v. Abbott, 17 Fed. 506 . This decision appears to have been uniformly followed in the circuit courts. Armstrong v. Ettlesohn, 36 Fed. 209 ; Armstrong v. Trautman, Id. 275 ; Yardley v. … Gibson v. Peters, 150 U. S. 342 , 14 Sup. Ct. 134.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pouncy

    93 F.4th 331 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 19, 2024

    First, Brown refiled his state law claim in state court, which dismissed the suit as untimely. Brown v. Pouncy, 2023 WL 3859923 (La. Dist. Ct. May 23, 2023). … In Mason v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Holland v. Brown

    35 F. 43 · United States Circuit Court · May 22, 1888

    Brown and William L. … Shoemaker v. Kingsbury, 12 Wall. 376 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hake v. Brown

    44 F. 734 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Jan 9, 1891

    The complainant cites the cases of Strauss v. Meyer, 22 Fed. Rep. 467, and of Tuck v. Olds, 29 Fed. Rep. 883, in support of hiS contention. … Stimpson v. Brooks, 3 Blatchf. 456 ; Wooster v. Handy, 23 Fed. Rep. 49; Spill v. Manufacturing Co., 28 Fed. Rep. 870; Factory v. Corning, 7 Blatchf. 17 . See also the opinion of Judge Jackson in Ingham v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bryant v. Merit Systems Protection Board

    878 F.3d 1320 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Dec 29, 2017

    Whether the Board has jurisdiction over an appeal is a question of law that we review de novo, Forest v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 47 F.3d 409, 410 (Fed. Cir. 8 BRYANT v. … The Board responds that Petitioners are barred from relitigating their second USERRA appeals because all the BRYANT v.

    Cited 70 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.