Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.17s
National Labor Relations Board v. Brown
375 U.S. 962 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 6, 1964
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textDouglas M. Wright v. United States Postal Service
183 F.3d 1328 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 15, 1999
See Grubka v. … Jackson v.
Cited 24 timesPublished927 F.3d 639 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 24, 2019
Hyman v. Brown , 197 F. Supp. 3d at 462 . … See Hyman v. Brown, 197 F.
Cited 98 timesPublished2 F. 440 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · Mar 15, 1880
Brown v. McKinney, 9 Watt. 565. Occupation, up to a recognized line, for 15 years, would establish it as the division line. Clark v. Tabor, 28 Vt. 222; Angel on Lim. § 393. … So in Phelps v. Henry, 15 Ark. 297 , the possession which will not ripen into title is said, to be one held without title or claim, of right, and only in ignorance of the true boundary. Also in Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublished70 F. 967 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · Nov 30, 1895
Cited 7 timesPublishedUnited States v. Jesse J. Smith
240 F.3d 732 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jan 26, 2001
See United States v. Brown, 148 F.3d at 1008. … United States v. Brown, 148 F.3d at 1008.
Cited 18 timesPublished3 F. Cas. 621 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1849
in violation of common sense and of the spirit of the decision of the supreme court of Pennsylvania which refused to extend the privilege in the case of special juries further than the letter of the act required, Shwenk v.
Cited 1 timesPublished652 F.2d 375 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 18, 1981
Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization, 426 U.S. 26 , 45—46, 96 S.Ct. 1917, 1927-28 , 48 L.Ed.2d 450 (1976); Warth v. … In support of their argument, defendants rely on Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 , 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388-89 , 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). The district court also relied on Van Bronkhorst v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedJones v. Department of Health & Human Services
834 F.3d 1361 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 22, 2016
On various dates in 2015, veteran John Paul Jones, III, filed sixteen appeals with the Merit Systems Protec- tion Board (“MSPB”), alleging that the U.S. … (“Our jurisdiction to hear the appeal was, in effect, sus- pended until” the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences became final. (footnote omitted)); accord Craker v.
Cited 72 timesPublishedJacqueline Tensing v. National Labor Relations Board
519 F.2d 365 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 28, 1975
Petitioners seek review of the refusal of the NLRB’s General Counsel to issue a complaint on charges filed before the Board. The Board has moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. … We have held previously that district courts may not review the refusal of the Board’s General Counsel to investigate or to file a complaint concerning unfair labor practice charges, Mayer v.
Cited 9 timesPublished34 F. 124 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · Mar 6, 1888
Brown was bound to know what took place at the meetings of the board of directors, of which he was a member, and that when he agreed to sell Mr. Brockett seventy-five shares he knew that Mr. … Merchants’ Bank v. Rudolf, 5 Neb. 527 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Watson-Rummell Electric Company
815 F.2d 29 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Apr 1, 1987
The specificity required for a claim to escape the ban imposed by § 10(e) is that which will “apprise the Board of an intention to bring up the question.” May Stores v. … Under Jim McNeff, Inc. v.
Cited 11 timesPublished822 F.3d 342 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 10, 2016
and Board of Commissioners. … Horwitz v. Board of Educ. of Avoca School Dist. No. 37, 260 F.3d 602, 617 (7th Cir.2001), quoting Klug, 197 F.3d at 861.
Cited 72 timesPublished5 Indian Terr. 718 · Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · Oct 19, 1904
board 5 months at $10). 50 00 Chandler (for boai’d 10 months at $10). 100 00 Solomon Harnatubbi (for board 2 months at $10.00). 20 00 Milton Brown, attending J. … Will Gattis (for board 2 months at $10.00). 20 00 Mrs. Farris (board 2 months at $10.00). 20 00 “Stonewall, I. T., May 12th, 1892. Mr. Milton Brown: Sir: Enclosed find your account against Joe H.
Cited 2 timesPublished7 F. Cas. 1186 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · Jul 15, 1846
Brown until three months after the expiration of the year, at which time he proposed to give property in security for payment. … Brown, and give notice to the defendant that it was not paid.
Cited 1 timesPublished88 F. 565 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · Jun 4, 1898
Price v. Abbott, 17 Fed. 506 . This decision appears to have been uniformly followed in the circuit courts. Armstrong v. Ettlesohn, 36 Fed. 209 ; Armstrong v. Trautman, Id. 275 ; Yardley v. … Gibson v. Peters, 150 U. S. 342 , 14 Sup. Ct. 134.
Cited 3 timesPublished93 F.4th 331 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 19, 2024
First, Brown refiled his state law claim in state court, which dismissed the suit as untimely. Brown v. Pouncy, 2023 WL 3859923 (La. Dist. Ct. May 23, 2023). … In Mason v.
Cited 27 timesPublished35 F. 43 · United States Circuit Court · May 22, 1888
Brown and William L. … Shoemaker v. Kingsbury, 12 Wall. 376 .
Cited 3 timesPublished44 F. 734 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Jan 9, 1891
The complainant cites the cases of Strauss v. Meyer, 22 Fed. Rep. 467, and of Tuck v. Olds, 29 Fed. Rep. 883, in support of hiS contention. … Stimpson v. Brooks, 3 Blatchf. 456 ; Wooster v. Handy, 23 Fed. Rep. 49; Spill v. Manufacturing Co., 28 Fed. Rep. 870; Factory v. Corning, 7 Blatchf. 17 . See also the opinion of Judge Jackson in Ingham v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBryant v. Merit Systems Protection Board
878 F.3d 1320 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Dec 29, 2017
Whether the Board has jurisdiction over an appeal is a question of law that we review de novo, Forest v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 47 F.3d 409, 410 (Fed. Cir. 8 BRYANT v. … The Board responds that Petitioners are barred from relitigating their second USERRA appeals because all the BRYANT v.
Cited 70 timesPublished
Ask Donna