Case law

Brown v. Eastern States Corporation

181 F.2d 26 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 4, 1950

See Brown v. Eastern States Corporation et al., D.C., 86 F.Supp. 887 . A motion was made by the appellee in this court to dismiss the appeal as moot and was heard along with the hearing of the appeal on the merits. … Fischer v. Star Co. D.C., 227 F. 955 , and Solanics v. Republic Steel Co., D.C., 34 F.Supp. 951 , with Daland v. Hewitt Soap Co., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 482 . And see discussion in St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v.

United States v. Anthony Brown

921 F.2d 1304 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1991

Throughout both its case-in-chief and its summation, the prosecution did not invoke the evidence of Brown’s prior acts. Cf. United States v. … Because we find the in-court filing satisfactory, we need not reach the question urged upon us by Brown—namely, when does a trial begin for purposes of § 851? Cf. United States v.

Dixon v. Shinseki

741 F.3d 1367 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Feb 4, 2014

On appeal, the Board of Veter- ans’ Appeals (“board”) affirmed, concluding that there was “no medical evidence relating [Dixon’s] postservice diag- nosis of . . . transverse myelitis and sarcoidosis to ser- DIXON v. … App. 362, 369 (2005) (veteran’s medical records were lost and never located); Marciniak v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 198, 200 (1997), aff’d sub nom. Marciniak v. West, 168 F.3d 1322 (Fed.

United States v. Nathaniel Brown

412 F.2d 381 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jun 16, 1969

We believe that the evidence adduced by the government establishes that *383 Brown was guilty of both crimes defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). 3 However, as stated in Prince v. … We find the contentions raised by Brown are without merit and affirm the judgment of conviction. Similar arguments to those raised by Brown were raised by the defendant in United States v.

Allstate Insurance v. Brown

920 F.2d 664 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Nov 29, 1990

Allstate Insurance Co. v. Brown, No. CIV-88-1499-T, order at 5 (May 4, 1989). … In Rogers v.

Brown v. Burton

140 S. Ct. 28 · Supreme Court of the United States · Aug 23, 2019

United States v. Brown

125 F. App'x 51 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 14, 2005

Brown filed a response to his attorney’s motion, see Cir. R. 51(b), and we limit our review to those issues raised in the brief accompanying counsel’s motion and in Brown’s response. See United States v. … United States v. Bass, 325 F.3d 847, 849 (7th Cir.2003). Finally, counsel discusses whether Brown could argue that his sentence is unconstitutional in light of Blakely v.

United States v. Tommy Brown

943 F.2d 1246 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Sep 3, 1991

United States v. … In United States v.

John Simpson v. Brown County, Indiana

860 F.3d 1001 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 26, 2017

. § 1983 against Brown County, the Brown County Health Depart- ment, and the Brown County Board of Health (collectively, “the County”). … Brown County Board of Health v. Simpson, No. 07C01-1312-OV-000873, slip. op. at 5 (Brown Cty. Cir. Ct. Apr. 13, 2015).

United States v. Rose Brown

66 F.3d 124 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 26, 1995

Regardless of whether Brown received Miranda warnings, her statement would be inadmissible on due process grounds if it were given involuntarily. United States v. … See, e.g., United States v.

Brown v. Dep't of State

317 F. Supp. 3d 370 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2018

Davis v. U.S. Dep't of Justice , 968 F.2d 1276 , 1279 (D.C. Cir. 1992). … See Students Against Genocide v. Dep't of State , 257 F.3d 828 , 836 (D.C.

Brown v. C. Volante Corp.

194 F.3d 351 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 8, 1999

The decision, therefore, stands only for the unremarkable proposition that the National Labor Relations Board generally has exclusive jurisdiction over unfair labor practice claims. See NLRB v. … See, e.g., Robbins v.

Jeffrey Short v. Edmund Brown, Jr.

893 F.3d 671 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 22, 2018

SHORT V. BROWN 9 B. … SHORT V. BROWN 15 3.

United States v. Dennis Brown

209 F.3d 1020 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Apr 7, 2000

See Carroll, 110 F.3d at 460 ; United States v. Brown, 962 F.2d 560, 564 (7th Cir.1992). … Brown, 962 F.2d at 564 ; see United States v. Woods, 976 F.2d 1096, 1100 (7th Cir.1992) (citing United States v. Rivers, 929 F.2d 136, 139-40 (4th Cir.1991)).

Brown v. Flowers Industries, Inc.

688 F.2d 328 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 22, 1982

. § 1332 (1976), which permits a resident of the forum state to resort to federal court to assert a claim against a nonresident for relief that a state court could afford, 1 Pete Harding Brown, a Mississippi resident, and … Murphy v.

United States v. Willie Davis Brown, A/K/A Will Brown

817 F.2d 674 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Apr 29, 1987

See United States v. Brown, 770 F.2d 912 (10th Cir.1985). After holding that the rule announced in Batson v. … See Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct. 824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965); United States v. Jenkins, 701 F.2d 850 (10th Cir.1983). 3 . The court subsequently determined action was unwarranted.

United States v. Tyrond Brown

64 F.3d 1083 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 31, 1995

The doorbell for Apartment 203 bore the name of Bonds but not Brown. The agents searched Brown incident to the arrest, see United States v. … Brown therefore has rights under the fourth amendment enforceable in this prosecution. See Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98 , 100 S.Ct. 2556 , 65 L.Ed.2d 633 (1980); Rakas v.

United States v. Emanuel Brown

247 F.2d 332 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 10, 1957

Brown v. Walker, 1896, 161 U.S. 591 , 16 S.Ct. 644 , 40 L.Ed. 819 decided that with respect to the same § 46 here in question, then 27 Stat. 448 , Act of February 11, 1893. Ullmann v. … Gordon, 2 Cir., 1956, 236 F.2d 916 ; United States v. Courtney, 2 Cir., 1956, 236 F.2d 921 ; United States v.

Amy Cohen v. Brown University

991 F.2d 888 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Apr 16, 1993

See, e.g., Wynne v. Tufts Univ. Sch. of Med., 976 F.2d 791, 796 (1st Cir.1992), petition for cert. filed (Feb. 3, 1993); Lamphere v. Brown Univ., 875 F.2d 916, 922 (1st Cir.1989). … The "authority” that Brown cites in support of this proposition, Regents of Univ. of Cal. v.

Brown v. United States

57 F. App'x 430 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Feb 25, 2003

Brown, Sr. moves for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his appeal for failure to file a replacement brief, and for an extension of time, until March 31, 2003, to file his replacement brief. … Brown’s brief is due no later than March 31, 2003. No further extensions should be anticipated.