Case law

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown-Graves Lumber Company

949 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 13, 1992

The starting point for our analysis is the standard of review for the Board’s determinations. We uphold the Board’s findings of fact where “substantial evidence” in the record supports the Board’s findings. NLRB v. … may occur); NLRB v.

Ebel v. SHINSEKI

673 F.3d 1337 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Mar 21, 2012

EBEL v. DVA 4 On October 21, 2008, the Board affirmed the RO’s de- nial. While the Board noted the various medical records documenting Mr. … DVA 6 that a decision by the [Veterans Court] remanding to the Board is non-final and not reviewable.”); Jones v. Nichol- son, 431 F.3d 1353, 1357 (Fed.

Wilson v. Mitchell

498 F.3d 491 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 15, 2007

In Fry v. … The Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Brown v. Sanders, 546 U.S. 212 , 126 S.Ct. 884 , 163 L.Ed.2d 723 (2006), casts some doubt on our current view that federal courts can do so.

Whiting v. Lacara

187 F.3d 317 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Aug 23, 1999

Brown v. National Survival Games, Inc., No. 91-CV-221, 1994 WL 660533 , at *3 (N.D.N.Y. … Brown, 1994 WL 660533 , at *4 n. 1 (citing Armstrong v.

Carpenters & Millwrights, Local Union 2471 v. National Labor Relations Board

481 F.3d 804 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 16, 2007

Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983)). Our review of the Board’s refusal to pierce A.J. … See NLRB v. Fullerton Transfer & Storage Ltd., Inc., 910 F.2d 331 (6th Cir. 1990).

James Campion v. Merit Systems Protection Board

326 F.3d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Apr 17, 2003

See Garcia v. … The Board has “only that jurisdiction conferred on it by Congress.” Cruz v. Dep’t of the Navy, 934 F.2d 1240, 1243 (Fed.Cir.1991).

Sevelitte v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America

55 F.4th 71 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Dec 7, 2022

See, e.g., Foster v. … V.

Dr. Bhartur N. Premachandra v. United States

739 F.2d 392 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 27, 1984

See Brown v. … Brown, 452 F.Supp. 427, 428 (E.D.Va.1978).

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown & Root, Inc.

318 F.2d 543 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jun 14, 1963

Bailey is dead, and that his surviving widow, Betty Sue Bailey, is the sole heir, and that the board has requested respondents to make the $533 payment to Mrs. Bailey, which respondents are willing to do. … Shortly after the motion was filed the Board submitted a memorandum in support of the motion, which memorandum had attached thereto copies of documents indicating that Dallas W.

FORD-CLIFTON v. Department of Veterans Affairs

661 F.3d 655 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Oct 19, 2011

The Board is afforded considerable discretion in such analyses. Id.; Mendoza v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 966 F.2d 650, 653 (Fed. … The basis for extending this doctrine beyond ‘judicial affairs,’ however, is far from certain.”); see also Bath Iron Works v. Brown, 194 F.3d 1, 4 n.3 (1st Cir. 1999) (citing Lockert, 867 F.2d at 517-18).

Rochelle Waste Disposal, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

673 F.3d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 8, 2012

Steel, L.P. v. … See Slusher v.

Bogen v. Doty

598 F.2d 1110 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · May 7, 1979

See Committee for Public Education v. … Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 8 , 67 S.ct. 504, 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947).

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown Shoe Co.

170 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Oct 27, 1948

Order of National Labor Relations Board enforced, on stipulation of parties filed with Board, and petition for enforcement.

Lonsdale v. Brown

15 F. Cas. 855 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1821

Van Raugh v. Van Arsdaln. 3 Caines, 154 ; Smith v. Smith, 2 Johns. 236 . … Bartlet v. Knight, 1 Mass. 401 ; Hitchcock v. Aicken, 1 Caines, 460 . In Hubbell v.

Henny Penny Corporation v. Frymaster LLC

938 F.3d 1324 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Sep 12, 2019

HENNY PENNY CORPORATION v. FRYMASTER LLC 7 B. After the hearing, the Board issued its final written de- cision. … Polaris Indus., Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc., 882 F.3d 1056, 1072 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Mor- ris Inc., 229 F.3d 1120, 1130 (Fed. Cir. 2000)).

Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Day

555 F.3d 882 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jan 13, 2009

Serv., Inc. v. … See Moore v.

Gilman v. Brown

10 F. Cas. 392 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1817

When it is stated, that “the board has expressed an opinion, that the vendors in this case conveyed only an equitable title,” (and by the vendors. … Hughes v. Kearney, 1 Schoales & L. 132; Nairn v. Browse, 6 Ves. 752; Mackreth v. Symmons, 15 Ves. 329; Blackburn v. Gregson, 1 Brown, Ch. 420; Garson v. Green, 1 Johns. Ch. 308 ; Gibbons v. Baddali, 2 Eq. Cas.

Brown v. Jackson

4 F. Cas. 402 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1807

This being objected to, the counsel, in support of the evidence, cited [Keppele v. Carr] 4 Dall. [4 U. S.] 156; [Gorgerat v. M’Carty] 2 Dall. [2 U. S.] 148; 1 Ld. Baym. 743; 3 Burrows, 1675; Hardr. 486; [Ingraham v.

Brown v. Minturn

4 F. Cas. 412 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · Nov 15, 1815

Vide, in addition to the authorities cited, 1 Gall. 429, note 6 [Meeker v. Wilson, Case No. 9,892]; 5 Term R. 424, 530; 8 Term R. 528; 1 Johns. Cas. 156 ; [Kennedy v. Fury] 1 Dall. [1 U. S.] 72; [McCullum v. … Coxe] Id. 139; [Oxley v. Oldden] Id. 430; [Burd v. Smith] 4 Dall. [4 U. S.] 85; 1 Bin. 502 ; 2 Bin. 174 ; 1 Camp. 147; Meux v. Howell, 4 East, 1; and, particularly, Pickstock v.

Cal Coburn Brown v. John Lambert, Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary

451 F.3d 946 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 19, 2006

For a more detailed discussion of the facts, see the Washington Supreme Court's opinion in Brown's direct appeal, State v. Brown, 132 Wash.2d 529 , 940 P.2d 546, 555-59 (1997) (en banc). . … We find no constitutional infirmity with Brown’s conviction. See Bumper v.