Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersF

10,000+ results

2.79s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Aerovox Corporation of Myrtle Beach, South Carolina

    389 F.2d 475 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 27, 1967

    Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v. Meter, 385 F.2d 265 (8th Cir. 1967); Angle v. Sacks, 382 F.2d 655 (10 Cir. 1967). … Brown v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co., 218 F.2d 542 (9th Cir. 1955).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Norman Brown v. Anne Precythe

    46 F.4th 879 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 30, 2022

    In Miller v. … Dist. v. Osborne, 557 U.S. 52, 67 (2009).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Banque Franco-Egyptienne v. Brown

    24 F. 106 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Jul 1, 1885

    Miller v. Fenton, 11 Paige, 18 ; 1 Daniell, Ch. Pr. 607; Story, Eq. Pl. § 393; Taylor v. Titus, 2 Edw. 135 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Awolesi v. Atty Gen USA

    Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 15, 2003

    Earlier, in Sotto v. … See also Tipu v. INS, 20 F.3d 580, 586 (3d Cir. 1994) (“[T]he Board failed to consider one of the factors in Tipu’s favor, a practice which in Sotto v. INS resulted in a remand for reconsideration.”); Bastidas v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ddr Holdings, LLC v. priceline.com LLC

    122 F.4th 911 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Dec 9, 2024

    But that principle is inapplicable here, where we employ a different claim construction standard than that used by the Board. See ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., 116 F.4th 1345, 1361 (Fed. … Case: 23-1176 Document: 42 Page: 13 Filed: 12/09/2024 DDR HOLDINGS, LLC v. PRICELINE.COM LLC 13 Board’s constructions during IPR. SkyHawke Techs., LLC v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Crowley Marine Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    234 F.3d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 22, 2000

    Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union v. NLRB, 711 F.2d 348 , 358 (D.C.Cir.1983). … Under this “discovery-type standard,” NLRB v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Fed. Election Comm'n

    386 F. Supp. 3d 16 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 13, 2019

    See Van Hollen, Jr. v. FEC , 811 F.3d 486 , 489 (D.C. Cir. 2016). The Supreme Court upheld most of FECA's spending limitations in Buckley v. … Sherley v. Sebelius , 644 F.3d 388 , 392-93 (D.C. Cir. 2011). The D.C.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    96 F. App'x 570 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Apr 22, 2004

    In United States v. … In United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Directv, Inc. v. Michael Brown

    371 F.3d 814 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 28, 2004

    United States v. … Rodgers v. Wood, 910 F.2d 444, 448 (7th Cir. 1990).

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Rosa R. v. Connelly

    889 F.2d 435 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 9, 1989

    Although the Tenth Circuit has held that New Mexico's boards of education are arms of the state, see Martinez v. … made by the Bridgeport Board in a related case, Laverne B. v.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    398 F. App'x 599 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 6, 2010

    Reviewing Brown’s petition de novo, we conclude that Brown’s appeal fails. See United States v. … Under Strickland v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dye v. Brown - Appendix

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 16, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    143 F. App'x 259 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 30, 2005

    Brach, appointed counsel for Jerrod Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. … Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    326 F. App'x 704 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 22, 2009

    PER CURIAM: Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … United States v. Brown, No. 1:01-cr-00023-CMH-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 14, 2008 & entered July 16, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    226 F. App'x 1002 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · May 30, 2007

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    325 F. App'x 165 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 5, 2009

    PER CURIAM: Oscar Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … See United States v. Brown, No. 7:02-cr00014-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, 2008).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Perry Manuf'g Co. v. Brown

    19 F. Cas. 298 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · Jul 1, 1847

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Huntington Piano Co.

    131 F. 273 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · Jul 6, 1904

    Such was the art prior to Brown. … charge the skilled mechanics of all the large piano manufacturing concerns of the country for about 15 years with imbecility, and yet that conclusion is inevitable if it is assumed that mechanical skill is tíre limit of the Brown

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown Manuf'g Co. v. Deere

    21 F. 709 · United States Circuit Court · Aug 4, 1884

    Brown, May 15,1877, for an improvement in couplings for cultivators. … It is conceded by the complainant'that Brown substantially began where Stover left off,—that is, Stover had attached the end- of his plow-beam to the axle through the instrumentality of a pipe-box, which rocked or worked

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Randy Childers v. Ed Iglesias

    848 F.3d 412 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 9, 2017

    Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). To survive a motion to dismiss, Childers must allege facts that show the Defendants lacked probable cause to arrest him. Brown v. … Haggerty v. Tex. S. Univ., 391 F.3d 653, 655–56 (5th Cir. 2004) (quoting Glenn v. City of Tyler, 242 F.3d 307, 313 (5th Cir. 2001)).

    Cited 32 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.