Case law

Brown v. Brown

245 F. 983 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 10, 1916

United States v. Gerardo Hernandez-Rivas

348 F.3d 595 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 30, 2003

United States v. Brown, 79 F.3d 1499, 1503 (7th Cir.1996) (quoting Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir.1986)). … United States v. Brown, 79 F.3d 1499, 1504 (7th Cir.1996) (quoting Video Views Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 540 (7th Cir.1986)). Within this circuit, this exception has been applied in two cases.

Adams v. United States

620 F.2d 1277 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 3, 1980

See also Cleverly v. Western Elec. Co., 594 F.2d 638 (8th Cir. 1979); Brown v. Bathke, 588 F.2d 634 (8th Cir. 1978). … In Keyes , the Supreme Court stated: Our Brother Rehnquist argues in dissent that Brown v.

Board of Education v. Brown

409 U.S. 981 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 6, 1972

William F. Allen, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

237 F.3d 1368 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Feb 2, 2001

Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1159 (Fed. Cir.1997); Travelstead, 978 F.2d at 1247-49 . … This case is thus distinguishable from Winn v. Brown, 110 F.3d 56 (Fed.Cir. 1997). In Winn , the veteran challenged the validity of a regulation. Id at 57.

Barry Clifford v. M/v Islander, Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority, Barry Clifford v. M/v Islander

846 F.2d 111 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · May 13, 1988

M/V Islander. … Alkmeon Naviera, S.A. v. *114 M/V “Marina L, ” 633 F.2d 789 , 798 (9th Cir.1980); Earnhardt v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 744 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1984). As the court noted in Western Pacific Fisheries, Inc. v.

Daniel R. Howard, Claimant-Appellant v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs

220 F.3d 1341 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 4, 2000

See Glover v. West, 185 F.3d 1328, 1331 (Fed.Cir.1999). … See Ledford, 136 F.3d at 779 ; Mayer v.

National Labor Relations Board, in 90-3592 v. Alan Motor Lines Inc., in 90-3647

937 F.2d 887 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 5, 1991

Labor Board, 340 U.S. 474, 496 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 468 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Allbritton Communications Co. v. … The Board could not logically have it both ways. “[T]he Board’s decision stands or falls on its express findings and reasoning.” NLRB v. Indianapolis Mack Sales & Service, Inc., 802 F.2d 280, 285 (7th Cir.1986).

Brown v. Brown

121 F.2d 101 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 1941

Moreover, in Lane v. … It read as follows: “Comes now the appellant, Mary Estelle Brown, through her attorney, and moves this Honorable Court to issue upon the appellee, George Brown, a rule to show cause, if any he has, why he should not be adjudged

Jose Torres-Valdivias v. Loretta E. Lynch

786 F.3d 1147 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 8, 2015

TORRES-VALDIVIAS V. … TORRES-VALDIVIAS V.

United States v. Carolyn Brown, Richard Brown, Dorothy Lewis Brown, Rosa Brown, Shenita Jackson Brown

954 F.2d 1563 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 6, 1992

The jury convicted Dorothy Brown on Counts I, III, V, VI, and VII; Carolyn Brown on Counts I, III, V, and VI; Richard Brown on Counts I and VI; Rosa Brown on Counts I and II; and Shenita Jackson Brown on Count I. … In United States v.

Dentrell Brown v. Richard Brown

869 F.3d 507 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jul 19, 2017

Per Curiam, On consideration of respondent-appellee Richard Brown’s petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed on March 9, 2017, a majority of judges in active service voted to deny the petition for rehearing en … Accordingly, the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed by respondent-appellee Richard Brown is DENIED.

National Labor Relations Board v. California Horse Racing Board, and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 1501

940 F.2d 536 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 6, 1991

final Board orders. 29 U.S.C. § 160 (e) and (f); AFL v. … See also Florida Board of Business Regulation v.

Brown v. Brown

4 F. Cas. 356 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · Jun 15, 1846

of the complainant, except by Cyrus Brown. … Ch. 211, 235; 1 Brown, Parl. Cas. 122; Shelton’s Case, Cro. Eliz. 7; Garnons v. Knight, 8 Dowl. & R. 348 ; 4 Kent, Comm. 455; 1 Johns. Ch. 240 ; Jaques v. Methodist Episcopal Church, 17 Johns. 548, 577 ; Buffum v.

Gambill v. Shinseki

576 F.3d 1307 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 13, 2009

Id., quoting from Thurber v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 119, 126 (1993). In this case, the court held, the Board gave Mr. … See Shinseki v.

Beata Zarzecki v. Merrick B. Garland

124 F.4th 1058 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jan 3, 2025

.; see also Arej v. Sessions, 852 F.3d 665, 667 (7th Cir. 2017) (“[T]he Board cannot make a reasoned decision to deny a mo- tion to reopen if it ignores the evidence that a petitioner pre- sents.”); Ward v. … Guerra Rocha v. Barr, 951 F.3d 848, 853 (7th Cir. 2020) (quoting Mansour v. I.N.S., 230 F.3d 902, 908 (7th Cir. 2000)). The Board sufficiently met its obliga- tions here and applied the proper standard of review.

Trident Seafoods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

101 F.3d 111 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 1996

Act.’ ” NLRB v. … Accord NLRB v.

Sayer v. Brown

7 Indian Terr. 675 · Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · Sep 26, 1907

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown & Root, Inc.

327 F.2d 958 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Feb 20, 1964

It is clear from the Board’s order and from our opinion and supplemental decree that all that the Board undertook to do, and all that we required it to do, was to afford Respondents an opportunity to examine the claimants … Respondents state that the Board has refused to permit inspection of the applications which the Board has in its possession.

National Labor Relations Board v. Brown-Graves Lumber Company

949 F.2d 194 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 13, 1992

The starting point for our analysis is the standard of review for the Board’s determinations. We uphold the Board’s findings of fact where “substantial evidence” in the record supports the Board’s findings. NLRB v. … may occur); NLRB v.