Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersF

10,000+ results

3.36s

  • National Labor Relations Board v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.

    388 F.2d 495 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Dec 22, 1967

    In Universal Camera Corp. v. … Bon-R Reproductions, Inc. v. NLRB, 309 F.2d 898 (2 Cir. 1962).

    Cited 91 timesPublished
  • Arlean Brown v. Brian Elliot

    876 F.3d 637 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 21, 2017

    BROWN, as the Personal Representative of Melvin K. Lawhorn, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. … Brown, repeatedly, and incorrectly, insists this conclusion lies at odds with our statement in Rainey v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Oyebanji v. Gonzales

    418 F.3d 260 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Aug 11, 2005

    See Sierra v. … See McCoy v. Mass.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    40 F. App'x 471 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 4, 2002

    I Brown first contends that the district court erred in denying his motions for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. … Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of Brown’s motion for substitution. Cf. United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Michael K. Topalian, Roy Jacobs, Jr., Richard H. Manuel, and Bobby W. McDonald and Armando Lopez v. John N. Ehrman, Etc.

    3 F.3d 931 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 9, 1993

    Even though it is the attorney whose signature violates the rale, it may be appropriate under the circumstances of the case to impose a sanction on the client.” citing Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. … In Boazman v.

    Cited 108 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of Pittsburgh

    586 F.3d 263 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 30, 2009

    Madsen v. … McCullen v.

    Cited 148 timesPublished
  • Board of Trade v. National Board of Trade

    154 F. 238 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Mar 25, 1907

    This paragraph sets out, with perhaps some unnecessary detail, the manner of the operation of the complainant Board of Trade, or exchange, and the way in which the information of the operations and markets of the board are … This allegation is not immaterial, as it bears upon the history and purposes of the organization of said National Board of Trade of Kansas City and its pretensions. This exception must be overruled. Exception 21.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Janice Brown v. Andrew Knapp

    75 F.4th 638 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 28, 2023

    Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 436, 444 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530 (1985)). … No. 22-1973 Brown v. Knapp, et al.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    73 F. App'x 875 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Sep 8, 2003

    See Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 637-38 , 113 S.Ct. 1710 , 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993); Watson v. United States, 165 F.3d 486, 488 (6th Cir.1999). Brown’s contention is meritless. … Moreover, in Daniels v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ladonna Brown and Craig Brown v. Skaggs-Albertson's Properties, Inc.

    563 F.2d 983 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Oct 28, 1977

    Patterson Dental Supply Co. v. Wadley, 401 F.2d 167 (10th Cir. 1968); Hammett v. Hunter, 189 Okl. 455 , 117 P.2d 511 (1941); Bland v. Lawyer-Cuff Co., supra. … See Imo Oil and Gas Co. v. Knox, 6 P.2d 1062 (Okl.1932), and cf. Bland v. Lawyer-Cuff Co., supra.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State Comptroller

    509 F. App'x 225 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 8, 2013

    PER CURIAM: Jerome Julius Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … See Brown v. State Comptroller of Md., No. 1:12-cv-01881-ELH (D. Md. filed June 28, 2012; entered June 29, 2012).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Perry

    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 14, 1999

    We held this case in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decisions in Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 118 S. Ct. 2275 (1998), and Burlington Indus. v. Ellerth, 118 S. Ct. 2257 (1998). … Id.; accord Reinhold v. Virginia, 151 F.3d 172, 174-75 (4th Cir. 1998).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gargiul v. Tompkins

    704 F.2d 661 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Mar 29, 1983

    Ornstein v. Regan, 574 F.2d 115, 117 (2d Cir.1978); Newman v. Board of Education, 508 F.2d 277, 278 (2d CSr.), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 1447 , 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975); Lombard v. … She raises here the same argument that she raised before the Appellate Division in Gargiul v. Board of Education II, supra.

    Overruled on other grounds by Gargiul v. Tompkins, 790 F.2d 265 (1986)Cited 51 timesPublished
  • David M. Brown and Carolyn W. Brown v. United States

    73 F.3d 1100 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jan 17, 1996

    Brown v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. at 26-28 . The trial court granted the Government’s summary judgment motion and denied the Browns’ motion for partial summary judgment. The Browns have timely appealed to this court. … In Herring v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    475 F. App'x 893 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 28, 2012

    PER CURIAM: Randy Christopher Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … United States v. Brown, No. 4:08-cr-00103-AWA-FBS-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 13, 2012).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Charles M. Tatelbaum, Assignee for the Benefit of the Creditors of A. Hoen & Company, Inc. v. The United States

    749 F.2d 729 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Dec 11, 1984

    A prerequisite to this court assuming jurisdiction over an appeal from a decision of a board of contract appeals is that the decision by the board must be pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. § 607 (g) … (1) (1982). 28 U.S.C. § 1295 (a)(10); North American Corp. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • United States v. Rico Brown

    77 F.4th 301 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Aug 9, 2023

    As such, notwithstanding Brown’s claim to the contrary, Wooden does not undermine the validity of our holding in Thompson. Accord United States v. … Apprendi v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Carvon Brown

    5 F.4th 913 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 21, 2021

    This was sufficient to apprise the district court of Brown’s “objection . . . and the grounds for that objection.” See id. Thus, we review Brown’s claim de novo. See United States v. … See United States v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • In Re John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman, Bankrupts. John Houtman and Gladys Irene Houtman v. Edgar F. Mann and Edna M. Mann, Creditors-Appellees

    568 F.2d 651 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 25, 1978

    Coen v. Zick, 458 F.2d 326 (9th Cir. 1972). … Lyons v.

    Disagreed with by Charlie Kelton's Pontiac, Cadillac, Oldsmobile & Isuzu Truck, Inc. v. Roberts (In Re Roberts), 82 B.R. 179 (1987)Cited 291 timesPublished
  • Susan Brown v. Douglas Ellmann

    851 F.3d 619 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 20, 2017

    Co. v. C.W. Mining Co. (In re C.W. … Brown argues that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Law v. Siegel, 134 S. Ct. 1188 (2014), counsels in favor of a departure from the decision in Baldridge. We disagree. In Law v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.