Case law

Brown v. United States

165 F.2d 409 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jan 13, 1948

The question on the appeal is the same as in Wright v. United States, 8 Cir., 165 F.2d 405 , and King v. United States, 8 Cir., 165 F.2d 408 , this date decided.

Brown v. Rican Corp.

117 F.2d 599 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Feb 10, 1941

See Straus v. Baker Co., 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 401 , 407 and cases therein cited. … See Schnader v.

United States v. Corrinne Brown

996 F.3d 1171 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 6, 2021

True, Juror No. 13 reportedly said that he “trusted the Holy Ghost” a few hours after he said that the Holy Spirit “told” him of Brown’s across-the-board innocence. … See United States v. Brown, 947 F.3d 655, 676 (11th Cir. 2020).

Hand,et al v. Scott,et al

888 F.3d 1206 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 25, 2018

In Connecticut Board of Pardons v. … Graham v.

United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 14, 2016

United States v.  … Cavera, 550 F.3d at 191;  13  see,  e.g.,  United  States  v.  Brown,  613  F. 

Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown

520 U.S. 397 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 28, 1997

Brown, who was driving, decided to avoid the checkpoint and return to Texas. … After he got out of the squad car, Deputy Sheriff Morrison pointed his gun toward the Browns’ vehicle and ordered the Browns to raise their hands.

Brown v. United States

21 F.2d 827 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 11, 1927

Criminal Code, § 37 (18 USCA § 88); Williamson v. United States, 207 U. S. 425, 447 , 28 S. Ct. 163 , 52 L. Ed. 278 ; Anderson v. United States (C. C. A.) 260 F. 557 ; United States v. Eisenminger (D. … Brauer v. United States (C. C. A.) 299 F. 10 . The averments of the count fell short of showing that the conduct charged had the elements required to make it a crime against the United States. Hilt v. United States (C.

United States v. Marquis Brown

42 F.4th 1142 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 2, 2022

UNITED STATES V. BROWN 7 (2007). … UNITED STATES V. BROWN 13 V. CONCLUSION We affirm Brown’s sentence.

Emmanuel Angulo v. Shawn Brown

978 F.3d 942 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 23, 2020

United States v. … Chafin v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

514 F.3d 1279 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008

claim against the former Attorney General, Brown v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (dismissal for failure to state a claim); Second Amendment Found. v. U.S. Conference of Mayors, 274 F.3d 521, 523 (D.C.

Brown v. Pacific Mall Steamship Co.

4 F. Cas. 420 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · Nov 20, 1867

Brothers & Co. from voting on the 53,332 shares held by them, whereby a minority of stockholders will succeed in choosing a board of directors, against the wishes of the majority, and of the plaintiffs. … persons holding such a position as that they can be considered a single party, for the purpose of restraining them from doing a particular act in which all are concerned — such as being members of a body of trustees or of the board

Brown v. Sunday Creek Co.

165 F. 504 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · Nov 30, 1908

Litchfield Coal Co. v. Taylor, 81 Ill. 599 ; Maule Coal Co. v. Partenhiemer, 155 Ind. 100 , 55 N. E. 751 , 57 N. E. 710 . … Himrod Coal Co. v. Schroath, 91 Ill. App. 231 ; Consolidated Coal Co. v. Carson, 66 Ill. App. 434 ; Cartcrville Coal Co. v. Abbott, 181 Ill. 502 , 503, 55 N. E. 131 ; Odin Coal Co. v. Denman, 185 Ill. 413 , 57 N.

United States v. Brown

491 F. App'x 439 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 26, 2012

PER CURIAM: Wallace Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … United States v. Brown, No. 1:07-cr-00437-CCB-1 (D. Md. filed June 20, 2012; entered June 21, 2012).

United States v. Brown

501 F. App'x 229 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Dec 19, 2012

PER CURIAM: Juleen Brown appeals the district court’s order denying her 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … United States v. Brown, No. 3:96-cr-00108-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. Sept. 18, 2012).

United States v. Richard Brown

732 F.3d 781 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 11, 2013

See United States v. … .); United States v.

Southern Pac. R. v. Brown

68 F. 333 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · May 13, 1895

Doolan v. Carr, 125 U. S. 632 , 8 Sup. Ct. 1228. In the case of U. S. v. McLaughlin, 127 U. S. 428 , 8 Sup. … Ct. 1177) that “the reasoning of the court in Newhall v.

United States v. Brown

385 F. App'x 147 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jun 30, 2010

Defendant now argues that the District Court violated the rule set forth in North Carolina v. … United States v. Murray, 144 F.3d 270, 275 (3d Cir.1998); see also United States v.

United States v. Brown

40 F. App'x 471 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 4, 2002

I Brown first contends that the district court erred in denying his motions for a hearing pursuant to Franks v. … Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of Brown’s motion for substitution. Cf. United States v.

Board of Trade v. National Board of Trade

154 F. 238 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · Mar 25, 1907

This paragraph sets out, with perhaps some unnecessary detail, the manner of the operation of the complainant Board of Trade, or exchange, and the way in which the information of the operations and markets of the board are … This allegation is not immaterial, as it bears upon the history and purposes of the organization of said National Board of Trade of Kansas City and its pretensions. This exception must be overruled. Exception 21.

Arlean Brown v. Brian Elliot

876 F.3d 637 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Nov 21, 2017

BROWN, as the Personal Representative of Melvin K. Lawhorn, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. … Brown, repeatedly, and incorrectly, insists this conclusion lies at odds with our statement in Rainey v.