Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.44s
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 2, 2024
Brown v. Texas Bd. of Nursing, 554 F. … App’x 268, 269 (5th Cir. 2014) (“to the extent that the Browns assert that they have raised new claims, such claims clearly stem from the same decision of the Texas Board of Nurse Examiners that the Browns have already challenged
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedEdward H. Spraic v. United States Railroad Retirement Board
735 F.2d 1208 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 26, 1984
Two other circuits, the District of Columbia Circuit and the Seventh Circuit, have upheld the Board’s interpretation of the statute against similar challenges. Givens v. … United States Railroad Retirement Board, 720 F.2d 196 (D.C.Cir.1983), petition for cert. filed, 52 U.S.L.W. 3722 (U.S. Mar. 16, 1984); Frock v.
Cited 8 timesPublished503 U.S. 978 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 20, 1992
Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Freeman v. Pitts, ante, p. 467, and Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City Pub. Schools v. Dowell, 498 U. S. 237 (1991).
Cited 31 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Fickett-Brown Mfg. Co.
140 F.2d 883 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 8, 1944
Marshall Field & Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 318 U.S. 253 , 63 S.Ct. 585 . 2 National Labor Relations Board v. … Oregon Worsted Co., 9 Cir., 96 F.2d 193 ; National Labor Relations Board v. L. H. Hamel Leather Co., 1 Cir., 135 F.2d 71 . 3 National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Shedd-Brown Mfg. Co.
213 F.2d 163 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 17, 1954
Thereupon the Board issued a complaint, which constitutes the basis for the order which the Board now seeks to have this court enforce. An answer was filed by Shedd-Brown Mfg. … B. v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedSharon Kay Holmes v. James Walter Wack
464 F.2d 86 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Aug 2, 1972
The applicable rule was clearly stated by this court in Brown v. … V. v. Walsh Steve. Co., 380 F.2d 523 (5th Cir. 1967), because a case of plain error is not presented.
Cited 64 timesPublished953 F.3d 945 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 23, 2020
Bd. of Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404–07 (1997). As a threshold matter plaintiffs must demonstrate that the policy at issue violates their constitutional rights. Sallenger v. … In Utah v.
Cited 85 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Brown Paper Mill Co.
133 F.2d 988 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 23, 1943
National Labor Relations Board v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc., 5 Cir., 108 F.2d 867 , certiorari denied 310 U.S. 651 , 60 S.Ct. 1104 , 84 L.Ed. 1416 . … International Ass’n of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 72 , 61 S.Ct. 83 , 85 L.Ed 50; Solvay Process Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 117 F.2d 83 .
Cited 3 timesPublished85 F.3d 644 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 8, 1996
85 F.3d 644 Brown v. Brown * NOS. 95-8300, 95-8322 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit May 08, 1996 1 Appeal From: M.D.Ga., No. 92-00005-ALB-AMER 2 AFFIRMED. * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3
Cited 0 timesPublishedRomero v. Department of Defense
527 F.3d 1324 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 2, 2008
In Department of the Navy v. … See Duane v. U.S.
Cited 37 timesPublishedGorlick Distribution Centers, LLC v. Car Sound Exhaust System, Inc.
723 F.3d 1019 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 19, 2013
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc., 433 U.S. 36, 52 , 97 S.Ct. 2549 , 53 L.Ed.2d 568 n.19 (1977).
Cited 14 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. Brown & Sharpe Mfg. Co.
183 F.2d 259 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Jun 30, 1950
Hence, since the Board had not made its findings with reference to the Act as amended, we set the Board’s order aside and remanded the case to it in order that the Board might have an opportunity to make particular findings … A decree will be entered enforcing the order of the Board. 1 . 169 F.2d 331 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedWilliam F. Allen, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
237 F.3d 1368 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Feb 2, 2001
Grantham v. Brown, 114 F.3d 1156, 1159 (Fed. Cir.1997); Travelstead, 978 F.2d at 1247-49 . … This case is thus distinguishable from Winn v. Brown, 110 F.3d 56 (Fed.Cir. 1997). In Winn , the veteran challenged the validity of a regulation. Id at 57.
Cited 71 timesPublishedNational Labor Relations Board v. E. C. Brown Co.
184 F.2d 829 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 31, 1950
Upon this motion the respondents do not dispute the Board’s findings that the Brown Company discharged one employee because he was trying to organize a union, and had refused to promote another for the same reason; that the … They confine themselves to two challenges of the Board’s findings: (1) that Brown Company shut down its factory on November 19th, 1947, to circumvent the union; and (2) that the Production Line was a dummy. of the Brown Company
Cited 6 timesPublishedGlenn Tibble v. Edison International
711 F.3d 1061 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 21, 2013
Brown v. Am. Life Holdings, Inc., 190 F.3d 856, 859 (8th Cir. 1999). For example, in Waller v. … Third, we observe that applying deference across the board, “by permitting an employer to grant primary interpretive authority over an ERISA plan to the plan administrator,” has the added virtue of “preserv[ing] the ‘careful
Cited 11 timesPublishedValley Hospital Medical Center, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 6, 2024
V. … V.
Cited 0 timesPublished382 A.2d 1038 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 14, 1978
Cited 0 timesPublishedMCPc Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
813 F.3d 475 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Feb 12, 2016
Inc. v. … Given the nature of the Board’s error, generally the “proper course” would be to remand to the Board for application of the correct legal test. Yusupov v. Att’y Gen., 650 F.3d 968, 993 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Kang v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedNidec Motor Corporation v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor Co
868 F.3d 1013 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 22, 2017
Belden Inc. v. Berk-Tek LLC, 805 F.3d 1064, 1073 (Fed. Cir. 2015). … Meiresonne v. Google, Inc., 849 F.3d 1379, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (quoting Galderma Labs., L.P. v. Tolmar, Inc., 737 F.3d 731, 738 (Fed. Cir. 2013)).
Cited 16 timesPublished245 F. 983 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 10, 1916
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna