Case law

Brown v. Apfel

144 F.3d 56 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 29, 1998

144 F.3d 56 Brown v. Apfel * NO. 97-6679 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 29, 1998 1 Appeal From: N.D.Ala. ,No. 2 Affirmed. * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3

Drummond v. Brown

111 F.3d 895 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 17, 1997

111 F.3d 895 Drummond v. Brown * NO. 95-7070 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Mar 17, 1997 Appeal From: N.D.Ala. ,No.9400974cvbne 1 Affirmed. * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3

Zevalkink v. Brown

521 U.S. 1103 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 23, 1997

Brown v. United States

260 F. 752 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Oct 6, 1919

Mackin v. United States, 117 U. S. 348, 352 , 6 Sup. Ct. 777, 29 L. Ed. 909 . … United States v. Waller, Fed. Cas. No. 16,634, 1 Sawy. 701 ; United States v. J. Lindsay Wells Co. (D. C.) 186 Fed. 248 ; In re Bonner, 151 U. S. 242 , 14 Sup. Ct. 323, 38 L.

Brown v. Pitcher

19 F. App'x 154 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 11, 2001

On appeal, Brown continues to argue the merits of these two issues. Upon review, we affirm the district court’s judgment, in part for reasons other than those stated by the district court. See Brown v. … United States v. Foley, 871 F.2d 235, 240 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Joseph, 781 F.2d 549, 552 (6th Cir.1986); United States ex rel. Placek v. Illinois, 546 F.2d 1298, 1304 (7th Cir.1976).

Canty v. Brown

526 F.2d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 31, 1975

526 F.2d 587 Canty v. Brown 75-1210 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fourth Circuit 7/31/75 E.D.Va., 383 F.Supp. 1396 AFFIRMED

United States v. Brown

872 F.2d 385 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 9, 1989

United States v. Gianni, 678 F.2d 956 (11th Cir.1982); United States v. Watson, 669 F.2d 1374 (11th Cir.1982); United States v. Davis, 666 F.2d 195 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982). United States v. … In United States v.

Woolfolk v. Brown

538 F.2d 598 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 30, 1976

In the earlier actions, the first system of state-legislated Work Rules was found defective in Woolfolk v. Brown (E.D.Va.1971) *600 325 F.Supp. 1162 . … The history of this litigation is set forth in the memorandum opinion of the District Court in this case, Woolfolk v. Brown (E.D.Va.1975) 393 F.Supp. 263, 266-267 . .

Brown v. Lovvorn

110 F.3d 799 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Mar 5, 1997

110 F.3d 799 Brown v. Lovvorn * NO. 96-8830 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Mar 05, 1997 Appeal From: N.D.Ga. ,No.95011231cvwco 1 Affirmed. * Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3

Joseph, Michael v. Bd Regents Univ WI

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Dec 27, 2005

The Board is an “arm of the state” for Eleventh Amend- ment purposes. Romco Ltd. v. Outdoor Aluminum, Inc., 725 F. Supp. 1033 (W.D. Wis. 1989) (applying the factors in Kashani v. … Joseph argues that Congress abrogated the Board’s immunity when passing § 1983. He cites three cases in support of his argument, none of which are convincing. The first, Vlandis v.

Clarence Brown v. Allison Taylor

911 F.3d 235 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Dec 12, 2018

Brown does not appeal, and has forfeited, these claims. See Med. Ctr. Pharmacy v. … See Addington v.

Brown v. Ornoski

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 19, 2007

People v. Brown, 45 Cal. 3d 1247, 1263-64 (1988). … BROWN v.

Doby v. Brown

232 F.2d 504 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 9, 1956

Brown v. Board of Education, supra, settled the law with respect to segregation in the schools. … Burlington City Board of Education v.

United States v. Aldo Brown

871 F.3d 532 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 8, 2017

v. … Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 104, 106 (1945); see also United States v. Brown, 250 F.3d 580, 584–85 (7th Cir. 2001).

Travelers Insurance v. Brown

338 F.2d 229 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 16, 1964

Brown, individually and as the natural tutrix of the children for Ambrose Brown, filed her complaint three days later. … In the light of these facts, it seems clear that Brown and Scott were not “employees” of Ethyl, within the meaning of the insurance contract and as that term is defined by Louisiana law. See Benoit v.

Ibekwe v. Brown

65 F.3d 180 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Aug 11, 1995

65 F.3d 180 Ibekwe v. Brown *** NO. 93-3246 United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Brown v. Konteh

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 2009

Nos. 06-4037/4043 Brown v. … Nos. 06-4037/4043 Brown v.

Mann v. Brown

18 F. App'x 399 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Aug 31, 2001

See Thomas v. Board of Education, 607 F.2d 1043 (2d Cir.1979); Abramson v. University of Hawaii, 594 F.2d 202 (9th Cir.1979). So No. 99-1750 no longer matters, and that appeal is dismissed as moot. … See Nelson v. Murphy, 44 F.3d 497 (7th Cir.1995).

Brown v. United States

257 F. 46 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 12, 1919

In the case of Beard v. United States, 158 U. S. 550 , 15 Sup. Ct. 962, 39 L. … In the case of Alberty v. United States, 162 U. S. 499, 505 , 16 Sup. Ct. 864, 40 L.

Anderson v. United States

344 F.3d 1343 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Sep 25, 2003

Estate of Bogley v. … Pty. v. United States, 133 F.3d 874 (Fed.Cir.1998); FDIC v. Maco Bancorp, Inc., 125 F.3d 1446 (Fed.Cir.1997); Wells Fargo Bank, NA. v. United States, 88 F.3d 1012 (Fed.Cir.1996); Winstar Corp. v.