Case law

United States v. Brown

592 F.3d 1088 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Jan 22, 2010

United States v. Charley, 189 F.3d 1251, 1261-62 (10th Cir.1999) (citing United States v. Wicker, 848 F.2d 1059, 1060 (10th Cir.1988)). B. … Thus, we hold that Brown waived his right to object pursuant to Rule 16 and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in overruling his objection. See United States v.

Brown v. Smith

633 F.2d 213 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 31, 1980

633 F.2d 213 Brown v. Smith 79-3589 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit 10/31/80 1 E.D.Ky. AFFIRMED

19 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1653, 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9247 Douglas Warren Webster, Cross-Appellant v. James F. Redmond, Cross-Appellees

599 F.2d 793 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 19, 1979

Bishop v. … Eichman v. Indiana State University Board of Trustees, 597 F.2d 1104 (7th Cir., 1979).

Doxsee Sea Clam Co., Inc. v. Christian Brown

13 F.3d 550 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 3, 1994

Brown sustained a laceration on his forehead as a result of being struck by a removable metal “bin board” used to prevent clams from falling off a conveyor on the vessel. … STAR, and particularly the bin board involved in the accident of November 19, 1989.”

Avalos v. Hud

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Jun 26, 2020

We have “occasionally noted but not endorsed” the Board’s resolution of this issue. Elgin v. Dep’t of the Case: 19-1118 Document: 47 Page: 9 Filed: 06/26/2020 AVALOS v. … Cir. 2002))); Wright v. U.S. Postal Serv., 183 F.3d 1328, 1334 (Fed. Cir. 1999) (“[C]redibility determinations by the board are ‘virtually unreviewable.’” (quoting Hamb- sch v.

Brown v. Witco Corporation

340 F.3d 209 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 23, 2003

See also DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151, 165 (1983); Thomas v. LTV Corp. 39 F.3d 611, 621-22 (5th Cir. 1994). … Thus, Brown has forfeited any argument that he is entitled to $85,801.58 based on the unambiguous terms of the May 24 Award by failing to raise the argument properly below. See Topalian v.

United States v. Brown

161 F.3d 256 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 16, 1998

Brown did not object to the instruction. The jury convicted Brown, and he appealed. On appeal, Brown argued that under Bailey v. United States, __ U.S. __, 116 S. Ct. 501, 133 L. … Thus, in concluding that Brown “used” a firearm, pursuant to the pre-Bailey “use” instruction, the jury necessarily found that Brown “carried” the firearm. See United States v.

United States v. Brown

598 F.3d 1013 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 25, 2010

United States v. Brown, No. *1015 06-CR-1028-LRR, 2007 WL 1498472 , *4 (N.D.Iowa May 21, 2007). … Brown’s motion for leave to file a pro se supplemental brief is denied. See United States v. Martin, 59 F.3d 767 , 768 n. 2 (8th Cir.1995). .

Charles E. Helton v. National Labor Relations Board

656 F.2d 883 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 29, 1981

Turner v. … NLRB v.

South Carolina State Board of Education v. Brown

393 U.S. 222 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 9, 1968

Lumpkin v. Brown

109 F.3d 1498 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Apr 3, 1997

See Waters v. … v.

Cooper v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 11, 2009

COOPER v. BROWN 5527 In Beck v. … BROWN query. See also Cooper v.

United States v. Brown

571 F.2d 980 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Feb 7, 1978

The’members of the organization were either friends or relatives of appellant Brown. … A common method of robbing these banks was used by the appellant Brown organization.

Meyer v. Rigdon

36 F.3d 1375 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 22, 1994

Brown v. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). .

Brown v. Moore

247 F.2d 711 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Nov 25, 1957

247 F.2d 711 69 A.L.R.2d 288 Emma Jean BROWN, Executrix of the Estate of George R. Brown, Deceased, Appellant, v. Martha R. MOORE, William W. Richardson, Jr., Julia R. Corbin and Robert R. Richardson (William R. … to Brown.

Brown v. United States

160 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 4, 1947

United States v. Brown, D.C., 67 F.Supp. 116, 119 . The sentence as actually imposed was to begin after the service of the combined term of all three prior sentences. … Rutledge v. United States, supra; Viereck v. United States, 318 U.S. 236 , 63 S.Ct. 561, 564 , 87 L.Ed. 734 .

Brown v. United States

146 F. 219 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 24, 1906

Brooks v. United States (C. C. A.) 146 Fed. 223 , decided at this term, and not yet officially reported; Stewart v. United States, 55 C. C. A. 641 , 119 Fed. 89, 94 ; United States v. Hess, 124 U. S. 483, 486 , 8 Sup. … But he did not understand or treat it as a representation or assurance that Brown & Co., would act as his agents in buying commodities on Chicago or any other board of trade.'

United States v. Brown

8 F.2d 564 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Oct 29, 1925

In jJnited States v. … Brown to appellee Brotton, and from Brotton to appellees King and Whitenton, should be set aside and canceled, and the title quieted in Miller Tiger.

Brown v. Quinlan, Inc.

138 F.2d 228 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 20, 1943

As the Supreme Court said in Mayo, Commissioner, etc., v. … Similar were the orders of Courts of Appeal in the following cases: Ordinary v. United States F. & G. Co., 3 Cir., 136 F.2d 536 ; City of Sumter v. Spur Distributing Co., 4 Cir., 110 F.2d 649 .

Harlen Associates v. The Incorporated Village of Mineola and Board of Trustees for the Incorporated Village of Mineola

273 F.3d 494 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 16, 2001

A zoning board’s decision can be considered irrational only when the board acts “with ‘no legitimate reason for its decision.’ ” Crowley v. Courville, 76 F.3d 47, 52 (2d Cir.1996) (quoting Southview Assocs., Ltd. v. … Co. v.