Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.03s
122 F. App'x 683 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 9, 2005
See Floyd v. Brown, No. CA-03-554-MCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 22, 2004).
Cited 0 timesPublished7 F.3d 1155 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 10, 1993
United States v. … V.
Cited 111 timesPublished662 F.3d 457 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 18, 2011
United States v. … Brown’s argument is foreclosed by our opinion in United States v.
Vacated on other grounds by Blake v. United States, 567 U.S. 948 (2012)Cited 10 timesPublished299 F.2d 438 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 1962
See United States v. Galgano, 281 F.2d 908, 910 (2d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, Carminati v. United States, 366 U.S. 960 , 81 S.Ct. 1916 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1253 (1961); Rule 7(c), Fed.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C. … Confronted by this ambiguity, we are-urged to follow United States v.
Cited 29 timesPublishedCella, Adler & Tilles v. Brown
136 F. 439 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · Mar 1, 1905
Ed. 1122 ; Bacon v. Rives, 106 U. S. 99, 104 , 1 Sup. Ct. 3, 27 L. Ed. 69 ; Wormley v. Wormley, 8 Wheat. 421, 451 , 5 L. Ed. 651 ; Wood v. Davis, 18 How. 467, 475 , 15 L. Ed. 460 ; Sioux City Terminal R. & W. Co. v. … Blake v. McKim, 103 U. S. 336, 338 , 26 L. Ed. 563 ; Hyde v. Ruble, 104 U. S. 407, 409 , 26 L. Ed. 823 ; Geer v. Mathieson Alkali Works, 190 U. S. 428, 432 , 23 Sup. Ct. 807, 47 L. Ed. 1122 ; Gudger v. Western N. C. R.
Cited 17 timesPublished18 F. Cas. 523 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa · Jul 1, 1871
Jones v. Andrews, 10 Wall. [77 U. S.] 327; Dunn v. Clarke. 8 Pet. [33 U. S.] 1; St. Luke’s Hospital v. Barclay [Case No. 12,241]; Dunlap v. Stetson [Id. 4,164]. 2. … Clark v. Des Moines, 19 Iowa, 199 ; Clark v. Polk Co., Id. 248 ; Burtis v. Cook, 16 Iowa, 194 . 3.
Cited 1 timesPublished636 F.2d 1135 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Dec 11, 1980
It states: Upon receipt of active duty orders any reserve officer and/or his employer may submit a request for delay in entrance on active duty and/or exemption from active duty to a board authorized by the military department … West v. Chafee, 560 F.2d 942 (8th Cir. 1977). We do not believe that the Army acted inconsistently with its regulations or that its regulations violate due process.
Cited 1 timesPublished243 F.3d 446 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Mar 14, 2001
Kassuelke v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc., 223 F.3d 929, 931 (8th Cir. 2000) (citing cases); see also Brown v. … Brown v. Gen. Servs.
Cited 25 timesPublished235 F.3d 2 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Dec 18, 2000
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 00-1046 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. … BROWN, Defendant, Appellant.
Cited 55 timesPublished398 F.2d 832 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jul 29, 1968
Cited 1 timesPublished152 F.2d 138 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 3, 1945
Brown v. United States, 40 A.2d 832 . Wigmore on Evidence, 3rd ed., § 1747. Beausoliel v. United States, 71 App.D.C. 111 , 107 F.2d 292 . Brown v. United States, 40 A.2d 832 . Wigmore on Evidence, 3rd ed., § 1420. … Keefe v. State, 50 Ariz. 293 , 72 P. 2d 425 ; State v. Rounds, 216 Iowa 131 , 248 N.W. 500 ; State v. Coram, 116 W. Va. 492 , 182 S.E. 83 . People v. Gage, 62 Mich. 271 , 28 N. W. 835 , 4 Am.St.Rep. 854 ; People v.
Cited 26 timesPublished170 F.2d 344 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Nov 3, 1948
In re Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1 , 66 S.Ct. 340 , 90 L.Ed. 499 ; Frank v. Mangum, 237 U.S. 309 , 35 S.Ct. 582 , 59 L.Ed. 969 ; Sanford v. Robbins, 5 Cir., 115 F.2d 435 . … In re Yamashita, 327 U.S. 1, 8, 23 , 66 S.Ct. 340 , 90 L.Ed. 499 ; Mullan v. United States, 212 U.S. 516 , 29 S.Ct. 330 , 53 L.Ed. 632 ; Reaves v. Ainsworth, 219 U.S. 296 , 31 S.Ct. 230 , 55 L.Ed. 225 ; Lisenba v.
Cited 1 timesPublished122 F. App'x 664 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 8, 2005
PER CURIAM: Tojuanna Brown appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss her employment discrimination action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. … See Brown v. Dollar, No. CA-04-122 (E.D. Va. filed June 1, 2004 & entered June 2, 2004) (dismissing for the reasons stated from the bench).
Cited 0 timesPublished558 F.2d 757 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Sep 1, 1977
See, e. g., Gilligan v. Morgan, supra; Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953); Silverthorne v. Laird, 460 F.2d 1175 (5 Cir. 1972); United States v. … See Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 , 96 S.Ct. 2040 , 48 L.Ed.2d 597 (1976) 4 Plaintiffs cite Crawford v.
Cited 5 timesPublished516 F.3d 1047 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 29, 2008
Brown filed a timely notice of appeal and on May 9, 2005, we granted the parties’ joint motion to remand pursuant to United States v. Coles, 403 F.3d 764 (D.C. Cir. 2005). United States v. Brown, 455 F.3d 267 (D.C. … The district court could have inferred that none of Brown’s arrests resulted in prosecutions because Brown was innocent. See, e.g., United States v.
Cited 14 timesPublished207 F.2d 310 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 8, 1953
Moss v. United States, 10 Cir., 177 F.2d 438 ; Story v. United States, 8 Cir., 185 F.2d 952 . … See also Silverman v. United States, 1 Cir., 59 F.2d 636, 637-638 ; Sorrentino v. United States, 9 Cir., 163 F.2d 627 , 630 and Bruno v. United States, 9 Cir., 164 F.2d 693 .
Cited 25 timesPublished12 F.2d 926 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 24, 1926
Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U. S. 465 , 41 S. Ct. 574 , 65 L. Ed. 1048 , 13 A. L. R. 1159; Malacrauis v. United States (C. C. A.) 299 F. 253 ; Thomas v. United States (C. C. A.) 290 F. 133 ; Ludwig v. United States (C. C.
Cited 6 timesPublished72 F. App'x 578 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jul 30, 2003
I agree that the district court’s denial of Brown’s habeas petition should be reversed and this case remanded for further *582 proceedings. … As noted by the majority, decisions rendered by this court after the district court had denied Brown’s petition have altered the tolling calculation and may provide a basis for Brown to avoid the limitations bar.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · Dec 16, 2022
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1314 IN RE: ALEXANDER V. BROWN, DEBTOR. ALEXANDER V. … Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 142 S. Ct. 1770 (2022).
Cited 0 timesPublished217 F.3d 247 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 29, 2000
See Leggett, 162 F.3d at 249 n. 12; United States v. Teague, 953 F.2d 1525, 1534 (11th Cir. 1992); Sexton v. French, 163 F.3d 874, 882 (4th Cir. 1998); Brown v. Artuz, 124 F.3d 73, 79 (2d Cir. 1997). … Brown, 985 F.2d 766, 769 (5th Cir. 1993), and may be supported by "any relevant evidence that has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy." United States v.
Vacated on other grounds by Randle v. United States, 531 U.S. 1136 (2001)Cited 60 timesPublished
Ask Donna