Case law

Hayden v. Brown

94 F. 15 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · Mar 17, 1899

All of the points raised seem to be covered by Hayden v. Thompson, 17 C. C. A. 592 , 71 Fed. 60 , on appeal from the circuit court of the district of Nebraska, except that the bank' itself was in that district.

Exela Enterprise Solutions v. NLRB

32 F.4th 436 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 22, 2022

Edith Brown Clement: Exela Enterprise Solutions, Inc. … In Parsons v.

Brown v. Bamberg

251 F. App'x 174 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 17, 2007

PER CURIAM: Kelvin Demeatrius Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. … Brown v. Bamberg, No. 8:04-cv-22925-TLW, 2006 WL 784735 (D.S.C. Mar. 28 2006) & 2007 WL 1521536 , (May 22, 2007). We deny Brown’s motion for appointment of counsel.

United States v. Brown

498 F.3d 523 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 16, 2007

United States v. … v.

Deonne R. New v. Department of Veterans Affairs

142 F.3d 1259 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Apr 27, 1998

See Cox v. Merit Sys. … In support of this contention, the Board cited three of its opinions: Davis v. Department of Justice, 61 M.S.P.R. 92 , aff'd, 43 F.3d 1485 (Fed.Cir.1994) (table), Stith v.

Brown v. Magee

140 F. 990 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Feb 21, 1906

The bill filed in this case is for. a discovery alone, and the facts are identical with those alleged in the bill in Brown, Receiver, v. McDonald and Sparks, 133 Fed. 897 , 67 C. C. A. 59 , 68 L. R.

Fields v. Brown

465 F.3d 397 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Sep 21, 2006

Brown v. Grundy

111 F. 15 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · Oct 8, 1901

De Wolf v. Johnson, 10 Wheat. 367 , 6 L. Ed. 343 ; Scudder v. Bank, 91 U. S. 406 , 23 L. Ed. 245 ; Trust Co. v. Krumseig, 172 U. S. 351 , 19 Sup. Ct. 179, 43 L. Ed. 474 . … Bank v. De Shon, 41 Ark. 331 -339.

Lonsdale v. Brown

15 F. Cas. 852 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1821

Burrows v. Jemino, 2 Strange, 733; 1 Saund. 92, note 2; Jones v. Scriven, 8 Johns. 453 ; Bird v. Randall, 3 Burrows, 1353; 1 Wils. 44, 175; 2 Saund. 155, note 4; 1 Show. 146.

United States v. Brown

328 F.3d 787 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Apr 21, 2003

Because Brown made no objections concerning his plea, we apply plain error analysis. United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 58 (2002). … Brown’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim, however, is not properly before this Court on direct appeal. See, e.g., United States v. Sevick, 234 F.3d 248, 251 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v.

Williams v. Brown

186 F. App'x 663 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 5, 2006

ORDER We remanded the dismissal of this prisoner’s civil rights case insofar as it charged one of the defendants, Nurse Brown, with reckless disregard of the plaintiffs medical condition (a rectal abscess). … remand, the district judge correctly found that there was no evidence of anything more than honest disagreement over the best way of treating the plaintiffs condition, and therefore the judge granted summary judgment for Brown

Brown v. Jackson

4 F. Cas. 400 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1806

Brown v. Barry, 3 Dall. [ 3 U. S. 365 ]. And as to the notice laid in the declaration, it was mere surplusage, and need not be proved. [NOTE. … If he takes the bill as payment, or by his conduct is considered as having so taken it, as if he retains it an unreasonable time, or negotiates it and receives the amount of it, as in Harris v. Johnston [3 Cranch (7 U.

Brown v. Yarborough

183 F. App'x 607 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 17, 2006

Brown further argues, citing Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S.Ct. 1532 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969), that the jury was instructed such that it could make an irrational inference. … Because Brown failed to raise this argument in district court, he has waived it. See Taniguchi v. Schultz, 303 F.3d 950, 958-59 (9th Cir.2002).

Walrath v. United States

35 F.3d 277 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Sep 8, 1994

Prison Review Board, 769 F.2d 396, 398 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1065 , 106 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed.2d 791 (1986); Trotter v. Klincar, 748 F.2d 1177, 1182-83 (7th Cir.1984); United States ex rel. Powell v. … Russ v.

Sigmond v. Brown

850 F.2d 597 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 30, 1988

Sigmond v. Brown was the first appeal to this court Boucher handled. He was out of his depth. In explaining his conduct to us, he admitted he had been careless. We agree. … We add the following to the end of that order: “Sigmond v. Brown was the first appeal to this court Boucher handled. He was out of his depth. In explaining his conduct to us, he admitted he had been careless. We agree.

United States v. Brown

117 F.3d 471 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Jul 21, 1997

Finally, we consider whether Brown's claim is barred under the retroactivity rules of Teague v. … United States v. Dashney, 52 F.3d 298, 299 (10th Cir.1995). Accordingly, Teague does not bar Brown's claim for § 2255 relief.7 V.

United States v. Brown

539 F.3d 835 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Aug 25, 2008

We review the upward adjustment of Brown’s sentence based upon his aggravating role for clear error, see United States v. … See United States v.

The United States v. W.H. Moseley Company

730 F.2d 1472 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Mar 26, 1984

The board noted that none of the Court of Claims cases cited by the parties regarding certification, viz, Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v. United States, 673 F.2d 352 (1982), Moseley, and Shelly & Loy v. … Gould v. Control Laser Corp., 705 F.2d 1340 (Fed.Cir.1983), cer t. denied, 52 U.S.L.W. 3336 (Oct. 31, 1983) (No. 83-247); Aleut Tribe v. United States, 702 F.2d 1015 (Fed.Cir.1983); Veach v.

Brown v. Hecht Co.

137 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 18, 1943

Brown, Administrator, v. Hecht Company, D.C., 49 F.Supp. 528 . 7 Fed.Reg. 3153. … Wallace, 8 Cir., 75 F.2d 733 ; Educators Ass’n v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir., 108 F.2d 470, 473 ; Gimbel Bros. v. Federal Trade Commission, 2 Cir., 116 F.2d 578 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Broderick v. Brown

68 F. 346 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · May 13, 1895

Fraser v. Thrift, 50 Cal. 476 .