Case law

United States v. Prime

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 13, 2005

With respect to this case in particular, the court noted that Storer’s training credentials in the Secret Service as well as her certification by the American Board of Forensic Document Examiners were “impeccable.” 3 … (emphasis added); United States v. Mills, 597 F.2d 693, 700 (9th Cir. 1979) (“In applying the rule developed in [Brown v.

United States v. Daniel Alfaro

935 F.2d 64 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jul 23, 1991

United States v. Baldwin, 644 F.2d 381, 385 (5th Cir.1981). … See United States v. Dancy, 861 F.2d 77, 82 (5th Cir.1988).

Brown v. Byerly

322 F. App'x 957 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Apr 14, 2009

court should have granted his motion for the following reasons: (1) he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority, (2) the complaint does not establish a constitutional violation because Appellee Malissa Brown

United States v. Brown

822 F.3d 966 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · May 13, 2016

United States v. … VI; Crawford v.

United States v. Brown

31 F.4th 39 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Apr 14, 2022

We further discuss this case, United States v. … In United States v.

United States v. Brown

650 F.3d 581 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 12, 2011

See United States v. Brown (Brown I), 459 F.3d 509, 513 (5th Cir. 2006). … (quoting Spence v.

Cobb v. Brown

193 F. 958 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Dec 6, 1911

In the former character it is an acknowledgment of the receipt of property on board his vessel by the owner of the vessel; iu the latter it is a contract to carry safely and deliver. Pollard v. Vinton, 105 U. … Co. v. Knight, 122 U. S. 87 , 7 Sup. Ct. 1132, 30 L.

Brown v. O'Brien

469 F.2d 563 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 1972

In Mitchum v. … In the companion case of Perez v.

Brown v. Peake

327 F. App'x 203 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Sep 11, 2008

Brown moves without opposition to voluntarily dismiss appeal no. 2007-7299. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Brown v. Peake

327 F. App'x 203 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Sep 11, 2008

Brown moves without opposition to voluntarily dismiss appeal no. 2007-7299. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Brown v. Fletcher

206 F. 461 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jun 27, 1913

Lewis v. Cocks, 23 Wall. 466, 470 , 23 L. Ed. 70 ; Buzard v. Houston, 119 U. S. 347 , 7 Sup. Ct. 249, 30 L. Ed. 451 ; Indian Land & Trust Co. v. Shoenfelt, 135 Fed. 484 , 68 C. C. A. 196 ; Robinson v. … Wabash Western Ry. v. Brow, 164 U. S, 271, 17 Sup. Ct. 126, 41 L. Ed. 431 . As. to the second ground, we need not inquire whether, under Byers v. McAuley, 149 U. S. 608 , 13 Sup. Ct. 906, 37 L. Ed. 867 , Waterman v.

Brown v. Commissioner

55 F.2d 1076 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 22, 1932

The Board of Tax Appeals held the petitioner liable' for an income tax upon the amounts of compensation he received from the city of Atlanta as supervising architect for a number of public school buildings. … The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the Board, reported in 19 B. T. A. 568, and need not be repeated here. We think the case is controlled by the decision of the Supreme Court in Metcalf & Eddy v.

Brown v. Victor

337 F. App'x 239 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jul 10, 2009

Auguste v. Ridge, 395 F.3d 123 , 132 n. 7 (3d Cir.2005). … Finally, the District Court properly dismissed the complaint without giving Brown an opportunity to amend since allowing Brown to amend his complaint would have been futile. See Grayson v.

Becker v. Office of Personnel Management

853 F.3d 1311 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Apr 7, 2017

BECKER v. OPM 3 Ms. Becker then appealed to the Board, which re- ferred the appeal to an administrative judge. … We review “the Board’s determinations of law for correctness, without deference to the Board’s decision.” Briggs v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 331 F.3d 1307, 1311 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (quoting King v.

Brown v. Maryland

361 F. App'x 514 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 22, 2010

PER CURIAM: Perry Brown appeals the district court’s final order of judgment entered after a jury returned a defense verdict in Brown’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … Brown v. Maryland, No. 8:07-cv-01956-PJM (D.Md. Feb. 23, 2009).

Brown v. Maryland

361 F. App'x 514 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jan 22, 2010

PER CURIAM: Perry Brown appeals the district court’s final order of judgment entered after a jury returned a defense verdict in Brown’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … Brown v. Maryland, No. 8:07-cv-01956-PJM (D.Md. Feb. 23, 2009).

Brown v. Raimondo

373 F. App'x 93 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Apr 21, 2010

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff Antonio Brown appeals from the March 25, 2009 judgment of the District Court denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. … Treece in his careful and thoughtful report and recommendation of February 25, 2009, see Brown v. Raimondo, 06-CV-0773 (N.D.N.Y. February 25, 2009), which the District Court adopted, see Brown v.

Winston v. Brown

247 F. 948 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 11, 1918

Brown (who will be called the defendant). … Brashier v. Gratz, 6 Wheat. 528 , 5 L. Ed. 322 ; Marble Co. v. Ripley, 10 Wall. 339, 359 , 19 L. Ed. 955 ; Holgate v. Eaton, 116 U. S. *950 33 , 6 Sup. Ct. 224, 29 L. Ed. 538 ; Slaughter v.

Brown v. Quattlebaum

334 F. App'x 551 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 22, 2009

PER CURIAM: Vernon Samuel Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative … Brown v. Quattlebaum, No. 9:08-cv-02225-GRA, 2009 WL 693130 (D.S.C. Mar. 13, 2009).

Texas State Bank v. United States

423 F.3d 1370 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Sep 21, 2005

The case was then stayed, pending the outcome *1375 of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … The United States asserts that, under our precedent, the Federal Reserve Board is a NAFI. See AINS, 365 F.3d at 1340 ; Denkler v. United States, 782 F.2d 1003, 1004-05 (Fed.Cir.1986); accord Research Triangle Inst. v.