Case law

Brown v. Ashcroft

41 F. App'x 873 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 21, 2002

Clemente v. Allen, 120 F.3d 703, 705 (7th Cir.1997). Exhaustion is not jurisdictional, and the government has waived any issue about Brown’s failure to exhaust by not raising it before the district court, Schiselman v. … .; Greene v. Meese, 875 F.2d 639, 643 (7th Cir.1989). Brown also argues on appeal that his guilty pleas to the federal charges were involuntary and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

Floyd Elmore v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.

844 F.3d 764 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Dec 23, 2016

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). B. … II, Inc. v. Doe, 660 F.3d 346, 359 (8th Cir. 2011). “In exercising its discretion, the district court should consider factors such as judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity.” Brown v. Mort. Elec.

Sherwood v. Brown

619 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 19, 1980

SHERWOOD, Appellant, v. Harold BROWN, Secretary of Defense, J. William Middendorf, Secretary of the Navy; Captain D. B. Pringoe, Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station Miramar, Appellees. No. 78-2475. … Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 220 , 92 S.Ct. 1526, 1535 , 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972); Cantwell v.

Brown v. Rinehart

325 F. App'x 47 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Apr 30, 2009

Rode v. Dellarciprete, 845 F.2d 1195, 1207 (3d Cir.1988). … Sharrar v. Felsing, 128 F.3d 810, 822 (3d Cir.1997).

Brown v. Daggett

458 F.2d 14 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Apr 12, 1972

The Board of Parole has wide discretion to determine under what conditions an inmate is to be paroled. See, O’Callahan v. … It is clear that the Parole Board may parole an inmate to the custody of detainers. Mingo v. United States, 350 F.2d 313 (10th Cir. 1965); Carson v.

Brown v. Grove

80 F. 564 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 14, 1897

Haas v. Sternbach (Ill. Sup.) 41 N. E. 51 . We see no fraudulent conduct here which can prevent a party from going into a court of equity and asserting his rights. … Camden v. Alkire, 24 W. Va. 674 . Nor has the statute barred the debt.

Brown v. Calabro

512 F. App'x 137 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jan 30, 2013

Clark v. Twp. of Falls, 890 F.2d 611 , 619 (3d Cir.l989)(eiting Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 701-12 , 96 S.Ct. 1155 , 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976)); see also Sturm v. … Moreover, now that his criminal case has resulted in a conviction, Brown’s claim may be brought only as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Preiser v.

Villanueva v. Brown

103 F.3d 1128 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jan 8, 1997

See Wang v. Allstate Ins. … Immerman v. Ostertag, 199 A.2d at 872 .

Freeman v. Califano

574 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jun 2, 1978

Will v. … Board of Education, 174 F.2d 642 (7th Cir. 1949). But compare Hattersley v. Bollt, 512 F.2d 209 (3d Cir. 1975) and Massachusetts Casualty Insurance Co. v. Forman, 469 F.2d 259 (5th Cir. 1972) with Gonzalez v.

Greenliant Systems, Inc. v. Xicor LLC

692 F.3d 1261 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 22, 2012

Xicor subsequently appealed to the Board. … It does not matter whether the exam- iner or the Board adopted a certain argument for allow- ance; the sole question is whether the argument was made. See, e.g., Springs Window Fashions LP v.

Brown v. Bradshaw

531 F.3d 433 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 26, 2008

Brown unsuccessfully sought relief via direct appeal. State v. Brown, 2001 WL 103958 (Ohio Ct.App. … Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37, 41 , 104 S.Ct. 871 , 79 L.Ed.2d 29 (1984). Brown argues that the alleged coercion of juror York violated Mills v.

Doe v. Brown University

43 F.4th 195 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Aug 4, 2022

Doe v. Brown Univ., 327 F. Supp. 3d 397, 407, 410 (D.R.I. 2018) (applying R.I. Gen. … The district court granted Brown's motion across the board. See Doe v. Brown Univ., 505 F.

Fisher v. Brown

70 F. 570 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Oct 8, 1895

The facts necessary to state the question are as follows: Brown made a contract with one Johnson to sell him the pine timber on a half section of land in northern Michigan, held by Brown, as trustee, for $0,125 cash. … In the leading case of Wooden-Ware Co. v. U. S., 106 U. S. 432 , 1 Sup.

CC1 Limited Partnership v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2018

Corp. v. NLRB, 863 F.2d 964, 967 (D.C. Cir. 1988) (stating that the Board “can infer from falsity of employer’s stated reason for discharge that motive is unlawful” (citing Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. … Ctr., Inc. v.

In Re Walter Steven Brown Diane Kay Brown, Debtors. Walter Steven Brown Diane Kay Brown v. Internal Revenue Service

82 F.3d 801 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Jul 9, 1996

Debtors Walter Steven Brown and Diane Kay Brown appeal from a final order entered in the District Court 1 for the Southern District of Iowa affirming the bankruptcy court’s 2 dismissal of their Chapter 12 case pursuant to … Portillo v. Commissioner, 932 F.2d 1128, 1133 (5th Cir.1991) (tax refund action).

United States v. Brown

669 F.3d 10 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Jan 19, 2012

Brown v. Ruane, 630 F.3d 62, 71 (1st Cir. 2011) (quoting Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 690 (1986)). … Hopkins v.

Brown v. Campbell

41 App. D.C. 499 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 2, 1914

The Examiner of Interferences and the Board of Examiners in Chief, after an unusually exhaustive and satisfactory analysis of the evidence, found that Campbell had established a conception and reduction to practice in February … VTe therefore agree with the Office that the case is ruled by Mason v. Hepburn, 13 App. D. C. 86; Richards v. Burkholder, 29 App. D. C. 485; Gordon v. Wentworth, 31 App. D. C. 150, and other cases in this court.

BROWN v. McGARR

774 F.2d 777 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Oct 31, 1985

James BROWN, an attorney on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank J. … Brown argues that we should not apply this rule, drawn from Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v.

William Thompson v. Philip Parker

867 F.3d 641 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Aug 14, 2017

Uttecht v. Brown, 551 U.S. 1, 10 (2007). … “The clear rule is that appellate courts do not consider issues not  No. 13-6085 Thompson v. Parker Page 14 presented to the district court.” Brown v.

Herbst v. Brown

23 F. App'x 84 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jan 4, 2002