Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersF

10,000+ results

2.60s

  • Stoltey v. Brown

    283 F. App'x 402 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 26, 2008

    In October 2005, Stoltey filed an amended complaint naming as defendants the board of trustees, Corporal Brown, and Brown’s boss, Krystal Fitzpatrick, who at that time was the assistant director of public safety at the university … See Beauchamp v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    24 F. Cas. 1247 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1833

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Patrick

    471 F. App'x 111 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 3, 2012

    PER CURIAM: Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion for permission to appeal, which the district court construed as a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, and has filed motions for appointment … Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Patrick, No. 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 2, 2011; entered Nov. 3, 2011).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Floyd Elmore v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.

    844 F.3d 764 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Dec 23, 2016

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). B. … II, Inc. v. Doe, 660 F.3d 346, 359 (8th Cir. 2011). “In exercising its discretion, the district court should consider factors such as judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity.” Brown v. Mort. Elec.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Harris

    472 F. App'x 175 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 26, 2012

    PER CURIAM: Ronald Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … Brown v. Harris, No. 3:10-cv-00613-REP, 2012 WL 12383 (E.D.Va. Jan. 3, 2012).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Rednour

    637 F.3d 761 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Mar 25, 2011

    Chap- man v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24, 87 S. Ct. 824, 17 L. Ed. 2d 705 (1967). Recognizing that Cranwill was the wrong standard, the district court applied Brecht v. … See United States v. Williams, 216 F.3d 611, 614 (7th Cir. 2000).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Turner

    76 F. App'x 471 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Sep 30, 2003

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    24 F. Cas. 1271 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · Jun 15, 1848

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Part-time Faculty Association v. Columbia College Chicago

    Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 15, 2018

    Workers Int’l Union v. … Haig Berberian, Inc., 623 F.2d 77, 82 (9th Cir. 1980) (“[V]alid Board representa- tion decisions take precedence over conflicting arbitration de- cisions.”); Gen. Warehousemen & Helpers Local 767 v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Owen v. Brown

    120 F. 812 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Feb 9, 1903

    St. 1901, p. 701]; Dartmouth Savings Bank v. Bates (C. C.) 44 Fed. 546 . … The recent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Metcalf Bros. & Co. v. Barker (October term, 1902), 23 Sup. Ct. 67, 47 L. Ed. -, and Pickens v. Roy (October term, 1902) 23 Sup.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mendes v. Brown

    465 F. App'x 232 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 13, 2012

    Mendes v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-00397-RLV-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 19, 2010; Aug. 29, 2011).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brannon

    535 F.2d 1249 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Mar 2, 1976

    535 F.2d 1249 Brown v. Brannon No. 75-2111 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 3/2/76 M.D.N.C., 399 F.Supp. 133 AFFIRMED

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Camp

    275 F. 612 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Oct 12, 1921

    Reynolds v. Tifton Guano Co., 20 Ga. App. 49 , 92 S. E. 389 , and cases there cited. … Stewart v. Jaques, 77 Ga. 365 , 3 S. E. 283 , 4 Am. St. Rep. 86 . The petition to superintend and revise is denied.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Harrison v. Brown

    471 F. App'x 211 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 25, 2012

    See Harrison v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-02642-RMG, 2012 WL 243212 (D.S.C. Jan. 24, 2012).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Jones

    489 F.2d 1040 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Feb 22, 1974

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ashcroft

    41 F. App'x 873 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 21, 2002

    Clemente v. Allen, 120 F.3d 703, 705 (7th Cir.1997). Exhaustion is not jurisdictional, and the government has waived any issue about Brown’s failure to exhaust by not raising it before the district court, Schiselman v. … .; Greene v. Meese, 875 F.2d 639, 643 (7th Cir.1989). Brown also argues on appeal that his guilty pleas to the federal charges were involuntary and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Klunder v. Brown University

    778 F.3d 24 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Feb 3, 2015

    See Krohn v. … See Bylin v.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Pirtle v. Brown

    118 F.2d 218 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 8, 1941

    See Breedlove v. Suttles, 302 U.S. 277, 283 , 58 S.Ct. 205 , 82 L.Ed. 252 . … Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, 170 , et seq., 22 L.Ed. 627 ; Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651, 664, 665 , 4 S.Ct. 152 , 28 L.Ed. 274 ; McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1, 37, 38 , 13 S.Ct. 3 , 36 L.Ed. 869 ; Guinn v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Montgomery v. Brown

    25 App. D.C. 490 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 2, 1905

    It is the rule laid down in Smith v. … See also the cases of Wright v. Holcomb, 5 App. D. C. 76; Smith v. Bell, 6 Pet. 68 , 8 L. ed. 322; Brant v. Virginia Coal & I. Co. 93 U. S. 326 , 23 L. ed. 927; Potter v. Couch, 141 U. S. 316 , 35 L. ed. 732, 11 Sup.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Old Republic National Title Insurance Company v. Tyler C. McCain

    545 F. App'x 820 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Oct 22, 2013

    See Hunter, Maclean, Exley & Dunn, P.C. v. … (quoting Brown v. Brown, 75 S.E.2d 13, 17 (Ga. 1953))). McCain variously stated he told McHenry that “the escrow deal had closed,” “the loan had closed,” and the “transaction had closed.”

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.