Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersF

10,000+ results

1.95s

  • English v. Brown

    229 F. 34 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Jan 26, 1916

    Brown v. English, 131 App. Div. 909 , 115 N. Y. Supp. 1113 ; Brown v. English, 137 App. Div. 900 , 122 N. Y. … Cadogan v. Kennett, supra; Clements v. Moore, supra; Wadsworth v. Williams, supra; Robinson v. Holt, supra ; Green v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Tillinghast

    93 F. 326 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Feb 6, 1899

    The facts stated in the hill are substantially the same as those which .were involved in the case of Bank v. Mathews, 29 C. C. A. 491 , 85 Fed. 934 , recently decided by this court. … Tillinghast v. Bailey, 86 Fed. 16 ; Rand v. Bank, 87 Fed. 520 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Securities & Exchange Commission v. Morgan Keegan & Co.

    678 F.3d 1233 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · May 2, 2012

    See Bruschi v. Brown, 876 F.2d 1526, 1529 (11th Cir. 1989). … Brown, 876 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir. 1989), and First Union Discount Brokerage Servs., Inc. v. Milos, 997 F.2d 835 (11th Cir. 1993).

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Canonsburg General Hospital v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell

    807 F.3d 295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 1, 2015

    See Provider Reimbursement Review Board Decision 41–42. … See Provider Reimbursement Review Board Decision 43–44 (citing St. Luke’s, 315 F.3d at 988–89).

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Loretta E. Stana v. School District of the City of Pittsburgh and Charles N. Allebrand

    775 F.2d 122 · Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · Oct 22, 1985

    Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). See Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education, 721 F.2d 550, 554-55 (6th Cir.1983). 8 .

    Cited 117 timesPublished
  • Rickel v. Navy

    31 F.4th 1358 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Apr 18, 2022

    Case: 20-2147 Document: 47 Page: 6 Filed: 04/18/2022 6 RICKEL v. NAVY The Board also found that Mr. … Cir. 2009) (“[T]he Board’s determination that the Case: 20-2147 Document: 47 Page: 14 Filed: 04/18/2022 14 RICKEL v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Hill

    573 F. App'x 3 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2014

    See Earle v. District of Columbia, 707 F.3d 299, 305 (D.C.Cir.2012).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Transue v. Aesthettech Corp

    341 F.3d 911 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Aug 27, 2003

    (footnote omitted)), disapproved of on other grounds, Brown, 44 Cal.3d at 1068-69, 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 ; Adams v. G.D. … Rptr.2d 589 (1994) (affirming that the "blanket exemption" set forth in Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Porcher

    660 F.2d 1001 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Oct 6, 1981

    In Edelman v. … In Steward Machine Co. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Brown

    85 U.S.L.W. 3165 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 11, 2016

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hamilton v. Brown

    53 F. 753 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 9, 1893

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Revell

    578 F. App'x 290 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 17, 2014

    PER CURIAM: Marty Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … Brown v. Revell, No. 5:12-hc-02183-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2014).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Texas v. Brown

    168 F.2d 587 · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Jun 2, 1948

    Y. v. Cheston, 332 U.S. 793 , 68 S.Ct. 21 ; Chase National Bank of the City of N. Y. v. Cheston, 332 U.S. 826 , 68 S.Ct. 163 . … Co. v. Daniel, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wilson

    578 F. App'x 323 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jul 28, 2014

    PER CURIAM: Jerry Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. … Brown v. Wilson, No. 1:13-cv-01304-LO-TCB (E.D.Va. Dec. 11, 2013).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc.

    33 F.4th 1348 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · May 13, 2022

    v. BENNETT REGUL. GUARDS, INC. remand. There is no indication that the Board had a change of heart regarding the merits. … .”); Zadvydas v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Leo

    12 F.2d 350 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · May 3, 1926

    But the agreement may be dehors the mortgage (Southard v. Benner, 72 N. Y. 424 ; Potts v. Hart, 99 N. Y. 168 , 1 N. … Y. 213 ; Russell v. Winne, 37 N. Y. 591 , 97 Am. Dec. 755 ; Hangen v. Hachemeister, 114 N. Y. 566 , 21 N. E. 1046 , 5 L. B. A. 137, 11 Am. St. Rep. 691 ; Skilton v. Codington, 185 N. Y. 80 , 77 N. E. 790 , 113 Am. St.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. McLanahan

    148 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Apr 9, 1945

    Byllesby & Co. v. Doriot, Del.Ch., 12 A.2d 603 ; Chandler v. Bellanca Aircraft Corp., 19 Del.Ch. 57 , 162 A. 63 ; Barbour v. Weld, 201 Mass. 513 , 87 N.E. 909 . … Such cases as Mackin v. Nicollet Hotel, 8 Cir., 25 F.2d 783 , and Clark v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Johnson

    224 F.3d 461 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Aug 21, 2000

    Herring, 938 F.2d 543, 559 (5th Cir. 1991), citing Townsend v. … . 15 See McKay v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Google LLC v. Ecofactor, Inc.

    92 F.4th 1049 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Feb 7, 2024

    Dionex Softron GmbH v. Agilent Techs., Inc., 56 F.4th 1353, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2023). We also review de novo the Board’s compliance with the Adminis- trative Procedure Act (“APA”). … Oatey Co. v. IPS Corp., 514 F.3d 1271, 1276 (Fed. Cir. 2008). In this instance, the Board’s claim construction ex- cluding such an embodiment is incorrect.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • United States v. Arthur Brown and Erma Brown

    667 F.2d 566 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jan 8, 1982

    When Erma Brown exercised her constitutional right not to testify in this case Arthur Brown had no opportunity to cross-examine a witness against him. He relied primarily upon Bruton v. … Furthermore, the district court found that the Browns were engaged in a conspiracy to evade income taxes and Erma Brown’s evidence was admissible under the co-conspirator exception to the hearsay rule. See Dutton v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.