Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,047 results
1.21s
Griffith v. Federal National Mortagage Ass'n
25 F. Supp. 3d 902 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jun 9, 2014
Statutory tax immunity and the constitutional tax immunity afforded to federal instrumentalities are not coterminous. Montgomery Cnty. … Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac indeed qualify as federal instrumen-talities.”
Cited 1 timesPublished394 F. Supp. 2d 854 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · May 4, 2005
Clearly, under the analysis in Stams, it does. Therefore, the Court finds the MPLA applies to this case. See also Bellomy v. … law because such law “cannot control the scope of the federal government’s waiver of sovereign immunity”). 5 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Aug 30, 2022
Third, he argues that he is entitled to qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity is an affirmative defense to Section 1983 that applies when an officer’s “conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights known to
Cited 0 timesUnknown570 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Sep 13, 1983
As observed by a distinguished English judge, it would establish the weakness of judicial authority in a degrading responsibility. … In construing the doctrine of judicial immunity in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Stump , this Court has previously recognized that “[t]he doctrine is qualified in only one respect.
Cited 3 timesPublished155 F.R.D. 546 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Mar 25, 1994
Lamm on the basis of work product immunity. 2 I. … As Milam admits, it is well-established that the scope and conduct of discovery are well within the sound exercise of a trial court’s discretion. 3 Erdmann v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jun 22, 2026
Defendant Allen next argues that he is entitled to qualified immunity because he did not violate Ms. Brown’s right(s) and no such right was clearly established. He notes that at the time of Ms. … She contends that he is not entitled to qualified immunity as to either the federal or state claims because she has sufficiently alleged violation of a clearly established constitutional right.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · May 5, 2026
Qualified immunity protects government officials sued in their personal capacity “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have … Because the Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that the Defendants have violated a clearly established right, the Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDoe v. American National Red Cross
845 F. Supp. 1152 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Feb 25, 1994
In that decision, the Court concluded “[although there is no simple test for ascertaining whether an institution is so closely related to governmental activity to become a tax-immune instrumentality, the Red Cross is clearly … types of suits, there is clearly a contrary legislative intent.”
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jun 4, 2026
[The] qualified immunity analysis consists of two prongs: (1) whether a statutory or constitutional violation occurred, and (2) whether the right was clearly established at the time of the violation. … Officers, however, may not benefit from qualified immunity at this time as the right was clearly established as early as 2013.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Aug 26, 2025
The court held that “for purposes of qualified immunity, internal agency policies, procedures, manuals, guidelines, or similar documents that have not been legislatively approved are not, and cannot be used to create, clearly … West Virginia qualified immunity is not legally identical to federal 10 qualified immunity.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Feb 27, 2026
However, a plaintiff may overcome qualified immunity by showing “(1) that the government official violated a statutory or constitutional right and (2) that right was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct … Nevertheless, Defendants argue they are entitled to qualified immunity because they did not violate any clearly established law by handcuffing a pretrial detainee for an extended period of time when they had a security
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Oct 24, 2025
Qualified Immunity Defendant Toppings argues that he is entitled to qualified immunity. … A correctional officer will be entitled to qualified immunity only if he can demonstrate that the constitutional right alleged to have been violated was not “clearly established.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jul 6, 2023
Meddings is not entitled to qualified immunity. B. Violation of a Clearly Established Constitutional Right Even if some of Mr. … Reeves’s clearly established Fourth Amendment rights. Therefore, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity. IV.
Cited 0 timesUnknownP. A. v. Fayette County Board of Education
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Aug 14, 2020
Qualified Immunity Defendants have moved for the dismissal of “all claims” based on an assertion of qualified immunity afforded to Evans.2 (Id. at 4.) … When performing discretionary functions, government officials are “entitled to qualified immunity from liability for civil damages to the extent that ‘their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional
Cited 0 timesUnknownWorkman v. MINGO COUNTY SCHOOLS
667 F. Supp. 2d 679 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Nov 3, 2009
the county at his or her discretion; and (II) Delegating to the state superintendent the authority to fill positions of administrators and principals with individuals determined by the state superintendent to be the most qualified … MacCallum are as follows: I have examined [M.W.], age 7, and I have also examined her sister [S.W.], age 11— who is clearly autistic and likely because her (unintelligible) at age 2.
Cited 8 timesPublishedPiedmont Behavioral Health Center, LLC v. Stewart
413 F. Supp. 2d 746 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jan 31, 2006
“When Congress wishes to allow private parties to sue to enforce federal law, it must clearly express this intent.” Pharm. Research and Mfrs. of Am. v. … As an initial matter, the plaintiffs fail to articulate any reasonable grounds for their claims brought pursuant to the Privileges and Immunities Clause or the Commerce Clause.
Cited 8 timesPublished224 F. Supp. 2d 1077 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Oct 4, 2002
She argues the allegedly defamatory statement of reasons for judicial recusal 1) does not reference Yo-der, 2) is subject to absolute judicial immunity and absolute or qualified privilege, and 3) does not contain a provably … “Absolute judicial immunity applies (1) to all judicial acts unless (2) those acts fall clearly outside the judge’s subject matter jurisdiction.” Roush v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jul 19, 2023
Qualified Immunity When performing discretionary functions, government officials are “entitled to qualified immunity from liability for civil damages to the extent that … If the evidence establishes a violation of a constitutional right, the second prong assesses whether the right was “clearly established” at the time of the events at issue. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · Aug 15, 2019
WVDOC is entitled to qualified immunity on these claims. … Stubblefield argues that she is entitled to qualified immunity for Plaintiffs’ negligent hiring, training, supervision, and retention claims because Plaintiffs have not alleged any violation of a clearly established law
Cited 0 timesUnknownCyrus Ex Rel. McSweeney v. Walker
409 F. Supp. 2d 748 · District Court, S.D. West Virginia · Jan 26, 2005
BACKGROUND As set out more fully in the Preliminary Injunction Order entered by this Court on September 17, 2004, Plaintiffs claim they are qualified recipients of the Medicaid Home and Community Based Age/Disabled Waiver … However, state immunity is not absolute, and two well-established exceptions to this rule arise where a state waives its right to immunity or Congress unequivocally expresses its intent to abrogate state immunity and does
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna