Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,674 results
1.04s
Algoma Coal & Coke Co. v. Alexander
136 W. Va. 521 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1950
That it did not do so indicates clearly that it intended to permit such section foreman to act as a fire boss and that, with knowledge of its existence, it recognized the established practice, which enabled a section foreman … It is obvious that the Legislature, which is presumed to be cognizant of the long established practice which permitted a qualified section foreman holding a certificate of competency to act in the capacity of a fire boss,
Cited 9 timesPublished208 W. Va. 432 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1999
not ordinarily be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous.’ ” State v. … and will not ordinarily be disturbed on appeal unless clearly erroneous.”
Modified on other grounds by State v. McCraine, 214 W. Va. 188 (2003)Cited 41 timesPublished75 W. Va. 192 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1914
This is practically all expert opinion evidence, and ail the witnesses on both sides seem to be well qualified. … As he is bound to prove his case clearly and fully, he must do what is reasonably practicable toward the elimination of uncertainty. That has not been done here.
Cited 7 timesPublished21 W. Va. 534 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1883
Varner, to establish the road through it which they did establish by *540 the order oí August 14, 1880. … If the use is clearly a public use, then the courts can neither restrain nor supervise the legislative authority over the subject.
Cited 52 timesPublished75 W. Va. 775 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1915
It is qualified and limited by the second clause, in favor of purchasers for valuable consideration. . … Va. 87 , clearly shows it is unnecessary to *781 prove notice, on the part of the grantee, of the fraud of the grantor in a fraudulent and voluntary conveyance.
Cited 13 timesPublished219 W. Va. 105 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 16, 2006
Sloan’s attorney should not have been permitted to prepare the Qualified Domestic Relations Order regarding Mr. … Sloan's attorney to prepare the Qualified Domestic Relations order. We find no error in that regard. .
Cited 5 timesPublished119 W. Va. 193 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1937
authorized to be fixed by the different levying bodies upon all classes of property by submitting the question to the voters of the taxing units affected, but no increase shall be effective unless at least sixty per cent of the qualified … While as a general rule the repeal of a statute by implication is not favored, it is clearly recognized by all of the authorities that such a repeal is called for where there is substantial conflict between the two statutes
Cited 3 timesPublishedDelardas v. Morgantown Water Commission
148 W. Va. 776 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1964
Section 1, Article 1, Chapter 24, Code, 1931, in part, declares that “Except where a different meaning clearly appears from the context, the words ‘public utility’ when used in this chapter shall mean and include any person … the users of such service reasonable rates, fees and charges, and the provision that any ordinance enacted for that purpose shall not become effective until it shall be ratified by a majority of the votes cast by the duly qualified
Cited 24 timesPublishedWest Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2015
It found that she is more qualified to speak on the matter as she is a medical doctor and Dr. Majoris is a chiropractor. The Office of Judges concluded that if Mr. … The evidence was determined to establish that Mr. Tully suffered no permanent impairment as a result of the compensable injury. The remainder of the Office of Judges’ Order was affirmed. On appeal, Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished221 W. Va. 549 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 12, 2007
The Legislature dealt with inclusion of qualifying convictions occurring prior to the establishment of the Central Abuse Registry through the enactment of W. … These residents may be dependent upon the services of others by reason of physical or mental impairment or may require limited and intermittent nursing care, including those individuals who qualify for and are receiving services
Cited 0 timesPublishedClower v. West Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
223 W. Va. 535 · West Virginia Supreme Court · May 4, 2009
intended to qualify the requirement that a motorist use a turn signal to those occasions where others could be affected by the turning vehicle. … The Commissioner’s hearing examiner was clearly wrong in concluding that Mr.
Superseded by statute, as recognized in Miller v. ChenowethCited 19 timesPublishedMILLS ON BEHALF OF GORRICK v. Gorrick
181 W. Va. 158 · West Virginia Supreme Court · May 18, 1989
We have also recognized that the trial court’s discretion in awarding custody must not be disturbed unless clearly wrong. … McCoy , we explained: In establishing which natural or adoptive parent is the primary caretaker, the trial court shall determine which parent has taken primary responsibility for the caring and nurturing duties of a parent
Cited 3 timesPublishedKessel v. Monongalia County General Hospital Co.
215 W. Va. 609 · West Virginia Supreme Court · May 19, 2004
Staff privileges do not establish an employment contract with the hospital”); Dutta v. St. Francis Reg. Med. … Public hospitals, however, are not entitled to that immunity.
Cited 13 timesPublished33 W. Va. 250 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1889
Any court before which an attorney has been qualified, on proof made to it, that he has been convicted of any felony, may supersede his license. “6. … to the official conduct of officers or men in public capacity, or to any other matter proper for public investigation or information where the fact that such publication was not maliciously or negligently made, shall be established
Cited 47 timesPublished182 W. Va. 248 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1989
Clearly, all four elements are not present in this case. … It is the defendant’s position that the evidence presented at trial clearly showed that the plaintiffs’ expert, Dr.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHinerman v. Daily Gazette Co., Inc.
188 W. Va. 157 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1992
Hinerman does not qualify as an elected public official by virtue of any of the positions relied upon by the Gazette. … Hughes Toolco, 569 F.2d 459, 480 (9th Cir.1977), (holding that “punitive damages are permissible once actual malice as defined in New York Times has been established”). .
Cited 28 timesPublishedState of West Virginia v. Tracy A. Back
820 S.E.2d 916 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 9, 2018
Back contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he violated W. Va. … Code § 61-6-24, i.e., “to thwart and/or punish future instances of qualifying acts of terrorism.” Yocum, 233 W. Va. at 445, 759 S.E.2d at 188. Thus, it is from this perspective that we consider Mr.
Cited 4 timesPublished113 W. Va. 156 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1932
That ruling, upon appeal to this court, was reversed and the bill dismissed, notwithstanding the clearly proven adultery of defendant with Mrs.' … Esther Black-(nee *158 Watson), on the ground that plaintiff was guilty of improper and inequitable conduct, insufficient to establish adultery, violative of her marriage vow.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Johnson v. Tsapis
187 W. Va. 337 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1992
That restrictions may be placed on the use of confidential information disclosed through discovery is well-established. … The order clearly states that upon objection by the non-producing party, any dispute regarding disclosure is to be resolved by court order.
Cited 10 timesPublishedState ex rel. Youngblood v. Sanders
212 W. Va. 885 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 27, 2002
Stone’s paralegal; 10 and the fact that the factual information contained in the internal memorandum prepared by the paralegal qualifies as “generally known” information. … Askin regarding her husband’s involvement with Miss Miller’s death is also contained in several police reports, that information clearly qualifies as “generally known” under the recognized exception to Rule 1.9 of the Rules
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna