Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,674 results
0.66s
State v. Board of Education of Jefferson County
135 W. Va. 349 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1951
by the board of education and that the charge of the petitioner in that respect is not established. … The petitioner in this proceeding has not established the right to receive the salary which he claims. In consequence the writ prayed for in the petition is denied. Writ denied.
Cited 22 timesPublished34 W. Va. 416 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1890
have a committee, made oath and procured other persons to make oath, before the County Court of Barbour county, that she was insane and not capable of taking care of herself, and had said McCoy appointed her committee, who qualified … Thus, clearly, the Circuit Court can not appoint a committee *419 without notice.
Cited 20 timesPublishedWest Virginia Supreme Court · Jan 7, 2016
Smith did not establish that he is entitled to temporary total disability benefits as a result of his compensable injury. … To qualify for temporary total disability benefits under West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-1 5.1, Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublished133 W. Va. 676 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1950
of law, the qualifying phrase in the instant instruction “in the absence of proof to the contrary” shows clearly that the trial court was speaking of a rebuttable presumption, that is, a presumption of fact. … The jury are therefore instructed that evidence of good character is a substantial fact, like any other fact tending to establish the innocence of the defendant, and if the jury believe that the evidence of good character
Cited 5 timesPublishedState ex rel. Leeber v. Board of Education
143 W. Va. 584 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1958
It is established herein that, though the charges against petitioners were reduced to writing and filed, they were not actually “entered of record”. … Clearly, there *588 fore, the removal order was void, and no vacancy was created by the entry thereof. In Hertzog v. Fox, Mayor, 141 W. Va. 849 , 93 S. E. 2d 239 , we held: “1.
Cited 8 timesPublished141 W. Va. 302 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1955
If Hopson could hold over until his successor was appointed and qualified, under the provisions of Code, 6-5-2, the failure of the Senate to consent to his appointment would be of no consequence. … Clearly, it was not the intention of the writers of the Constitution, and of the people of this State who adopted it, that such *308 a situation should prevail as to appointees to office where the authority to select such
Cited 6 timesPublished56 W. Va. 690 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1904
Va. 771, 773 , and it clearly covers the objection raised here. The syllabus in State v. … They constitute a hypothetical statement of facts as to which there is evidence, leaving it to the jury to determine whether they are established.
Overruled on other grounds by State Ex Rel. May v. Boles, 149 W. Va. 155 (1964)Cited 46 timesPublishedVirdie Allen v. Monsanto Co. and Pharmacia Corp.
West Virginia Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2013
With respect to the medical monitoring class settlement, the court determined that the ultimate evidence established that only about 5,000 people had significant exposure to qualify for benefits under Syllabus Point 3 of … The plaintiff’s demographic expert concluded that approximately 5,000 people could actually meet all the criteria established by [Class expert] Dr. Sawyer to qualify for [Class expert] Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCOMMITTEE ON LEGAL ETHICS OF W. VA. BAR v. Pietranton
99 S.E.2d 15 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1957
His unreliability is clearly demonstrated by the numerous differences in his testimony, as given at different times, his biased attitude as a witness, and by his several attempts to obtain immunity from prosecution as to … effect in the determination of the question as to the sufficiency of the evidence to fully and clearly establish the charges contained in the complaint of the committee.
Cited 0 timesPublished127 W. Va. 602 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1945
Va. 351 , this Court held that: “A decision upon a general demurrer to a bill, which has clearly gone to the merits of the case, is an effectual bar to further litigation; and where no formal defects appear upon the face … Nor is property held in trust immune against such an assessment. No statute creates such exemption, and no equitable or legal principle is cited which would so operate.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMurphy v. Eastern American Energy Corp.
224 W. Va. 95 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 23, 2009
The Appellant, however, did not qualify as a “dependent” under the statute, based upon the determination made by Workers’ Compensation. 4 Consequently, the Appellee asserted that there were no persons with the statutory right … Our precedents are not sacrosanct, for we have overruled prior decisions where the necessity and propriety of doing so has been established. See Patterson v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedWest Virginia Supreme Court · Oct 12, 2018
However, the record clearly shows that Ms. … While we acknowledge that the circuit court did not formally qualify Ms. Talley as an expert witness, it did find that she was qualified to testify to the matter.
Cited 0 timesPublished197 W. Va. 588 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1996
Defense counsel did not object to the jurors being qualified, and we do not find anything in the record that suggests that they were not qualified to serve.” … Clearly, this situation is not the case sub judice. The jury was given a permissive choice whether to infer malice.
Modified on other grounds by State v. Tommy Y., Jr., 219 W. Va. 530 (2006)Cited 196 timesPublished182 W. Va. 345 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1989
The well established rule in this jurisdiction is stated in Syllabus Point 1 of State v. … Here, we do not believe the victim’s extrajudicial statement qualifies as exculpatory impeachment evidence.
Cited 78 timesPublishedUnited Hospital Center v. Cheryl Romano, Assessor Of Harrison County, etc.
233 W. Va. 313 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2014
Because there is no dispute as to the Hospital’s qualification as a charitable organization pursuant to federal law, we proceed to examine whether the second prong of the test adopted in Wellsburg has been established. … laws, for the benefit of an indefinite number of persons, either by bringing their hearts under the influence of education or religion, by relieving their bodies from disease, suffering or constraint, by assisting them to establish
Cited 2 timesPublished173 W. Va. 335 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1984
He claimed that the college had a de facto tenure program under which he qualified. … The defendants argue that their defense of good faith immunity with regard to the procedural due process claim was established as a matter of law.
Cited 146 timesPublishedWV CONSOL. PUBLIC RETIREMENT BD. v. Carter
633 S.E.2d 521 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2006
Va.Code § 5-10-1, et seq. ); the Teachers Retirement System (established in W. Va.Code § 18-7A-1, et seq. ); the Teachers Defined Contribution Retirement System (established by W. … Va.Code § 18-7B-1, et seq. ); the West Virginia State Police Death, Disability and Retirement Fund (established by W. Va.Code § 15-2-1, et seq. ); the West Virginia State Police Retirement System (established by W.
Cited 0 timesPublished166 W. Va. 309 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1980
This departure from the traditional verbal act rule was firmly established in Starcher v. South Penn Oil Co., 81 W. … We cannot say today that the lower court was clearly wrong in admitting the statement as a dying declaration.
Modified on other grounds by State v. Julius, 185 W. Va. 422 (1991)Cited 28 timesPublished222 W. Va. 661 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jan 9, 2009
protected by the Privileges and Immunities Clause, U.S. … Therefore, our law clearly recognizes the general validity of residency requirements.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Atkinson v. Wilson
175 W. Va. 352 · West Virginia Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1985
Their “decision not to decide” establishes a paradoxical injustice under the laws of this State. That is, if a viable unborn child is killed, the estate may sue for monetary damages from the wrongdoer. … However, if the same child is killed under circumstances which would constitute murder or manslaughter, but for the fact that the child is still in his mother’s womb, the wrong-doer is immune from criminal prosecution for
Superseded by statute, as recognized in Justus v. AtchisonCited 21 timesPublished
Ask Donna