Case law

Vrinceanu v. King County

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 24, 2023

Seq” are 22 clearly duplicative of the claims in Case No. 2:23-cv-00539-RAJ. … Dismissal of Individual Defendants based on Qualified Immunity The Court declines to address this issue at this time given that the case is being 4

Shaterian v. MAPFRE Insurance Company

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jun 5, 2025

The party seeking to compel discovery has the 3 burden of establishing that its requests are relevant. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). … Apr. 26, 2013) (“Although Cedell focuses 21 primarily upon the attorney–client privilege, the case clearly states that the presumption applies equally to the work product doctrine.”).

Providence Health System-Washington v. Bush

461 F. Supp. 2d 1226 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Nov 8, 2006

In this action, Providence seeks to establish a constructive trust or equitable lien over the funds contained within the special needs trust. … The make whole doctrine is clearly not eliminated from the plan by virtue of its precise terms.

White v. University of Washington

District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 22, 2024

The remaining exhibits are neither clearly referenced in nor relevant to 3 Plaintiff’s briefing on the 12(c) motion or motion to amend. See Dkt. Nos. 73, 79, 80. 4 a. … Cobban, 947 F.3d 1130 (9th Cir. 2020) (“In a § 1983 22 9 The Court does not address whether Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, as

Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Rubenstein's Contract Carpet LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jun 30, 2020

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for 13 protection, the producing party also must clearly identify the protected … This 4 provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery 5 order or agreement that provides for production without prior privilege review.

Leishman v. Washington Attorney General's Office

District Court, W.D. Washington · Oct 31, 2023

Having found no plausible Section 1983 claim, the Court declines to reach the question of qualified immunity. 21 … functions generally are 23 1 shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate 2 clearly established statutory

Stanley v. United States of America

District Court, W.D. Washington · Oct 31, 2022

He nevertheless argues that her education, training, and experience qualify 19 Ms. … provider when obtaining rehabilitative services for a patient recovering from a Rolando-type 23 fracture is clearly

Hebron v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

District Court, W.D. Washington · May 18, 2022

The AAO also determined Lion Air had not 20 established that Mr. … The AAO reserved 3 the issues of whether Lion Air established that it is qualified to be the petitioner for the I-140 4 petition and whether

Martinez v. Eastside Fire and Rescue

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jun 10, 2025

Defendant EFR’s Directive clearly articulated the 15 vaccine requirements, set reasonable deadlines, outlined the consequences of failure to apply, 16 clearly laid out an opportunity to be heard, and provided that employees … could “[s]ubmit, and 17 receive approval for a qualified accommodation as identified.”

Brogdon v. State of Washington

District Court, W.D. Washington · Apr 3, 2024

It argues that DCYF is a state agency and that it has not 16 waived its Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity. Id. at 6. … tribe” are not enough to establish standing 5 to assert an ICWA claim.

Ali v. Ashcroft

213 F.R.D. 390 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Jan 17, 2003

Nothing has made this point more clearly than the Government’s own submissions to this Court. … Nowhere is it envisioned that Congress established a system that eliminated the need for acceptance from the receiving country.

Wingate v. City of Seattle

198 F. Supp. 3d 1221 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 26, 2016

Under these circumstances the obvious benefit to the City Defendants is a plea restricted to police reports to establish probable cause. … Wingate agreed to undoubtedly evidenced probable cause which in essence immunized the City Defendants from any arrest or charging error.

Jones v. City of Seattle

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jun 28, 2024

Therefore, the matters admitted 10 are conclusively established. … Further, Plaintiff explained that her 2 religious beliefs “include the knowledge of natural immunity.” Dkt. # 50 at 6.

Peoples Nat. Bank of Washington v. United States

608 F. Supp. 672 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Jan 1, 1984

The only way to overcome such a levy is to establish an interest prior to that of the government. See United States v. … Clearly, therefore, Peoples claim of a security interest under the UCC must be rejected. B.

Noh

District Court, W.D. Washington · Nov 3, 2025

The party asserting jurisdiction has the burden of establishing it. 11 See United States v. Orr Water Ditch Co., 600 F.3d 1152, 1157 (9th Cir. 2010). … Any amended complaint must clearly set 16 forth the “who, what, where, when, and why” necessary for the Court and Defendants to 17 understand what Ms. Noh is alleging. See Fed. R. Civ.

Sea Mar Community Health Centers v. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

District Court, W.D. Washington · Sep 26, 2025

Founded in 1978, Plaintiff Sea Mar Community Health Centers (“Sea Mar”) 3 is a federally qualified health center that provides community health … Club, 11 221 P.2d 544, 545 (Wash. 1950), a 75-year-old case that does not clearly establish a 12

Evanston Insurance v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance

546 F. Supp. 2d 1134 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 4, 2008

Most notably, the subcontract required Northwest to indemnify Champion and Bellevue Master and to waive employer immunity. (See Lavorgna Dep., Dkt. No. 13 at 76.) Northwest did not sign or return the subcontract. … The 2001 purchase order between Northwest and Bellevue Master included in the motion is clearly limited to the job Northwest was to perform and not for all work at the Lincoln Square Project.

The Denali

23 F. Supp. 145 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 31, 1938

shown on all the charts, aud clearly described in the pilot books for those waters. … There is no proof or intimation that the chief mate was better qualified than either the master or the pilot.

Harlys Daniel Rosario Cantillo v. Warden Northwest Detention Center et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington · Feb 27, 2026

The “burden is on the ‘next friend’ clearly to establish the 14 propriety of his status and thereby justify jurisdiction of the court.” … June 28, 2018). 4 Even assuming Arteta qualifies for “next friend” status, which would permit her to file a 5 petition on Petitioner’s behalf, it does not allow her to prosecute this action pro se

Lyon v. Thurston County

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jan 16, 2025

The burden then shifts 11 to the nonmoving party to establish a genuine issue of material fact. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. 12 v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 585-87 (1986). … Even if a law enforcement officer mistakenly believes there is probable cause 15 to make an arrest, if that belief was reasonable, the officer is entitled to qualified immunity. Id. 16 at 679.