Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,747 results
7.28s
District Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownCard v. Tacoma Municipal Court
District Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownCard v. King County Superior Court
District Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Jun 3, 2022
Nev. 1995) (“No RICO statute waives the sovereign immunity of the United States or 6 its agencies.”), aff’d sub nom. McMillan v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 87 F.3d 1320 (9th Cir. 7 1996). Because Mr. … An action to establish the 20 President’s RICO liability for unspecified environmental violations likely does not 21 qualify as a civil rights action. Even if it did, Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Oct 20, 2023
immunity grounds. … “If the answer to either question is ‘no,’ then the [officers] are entitled to 17 qualified immunity.” Reichle v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownCard v. Pierce County Sheriff's Department
District Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownCard v. Pierce County Sheriffs Department
District Court, W.D. Washington · May 13, 2025
No. 1-1 at 5–6.)1 The 8 Court identified that Plaintiff’s claims were likely barred by judicial immunity 9 and were otherwise not clearly stated, and ordered him to file an amended 10 … A 19 Magistrate Judge found that Plaintiff qualified for IFP status but that his 20 complaint failed to state a claim. (Dkt. No. 7.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Jul 30, 2025
On January 12, 14 2022, BOP “established interim procedures to ensure timely implementation of the FSA final rule.” 15 Id. … Lucero, 135 F.4th 1213 (10th Cir. 2025) (finding that the prison officials were entitled to qualified immunity).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · May 8, 2025
Aguda’s complaint because it failed to establish 21 a basis for this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction, establish a waiver of the United States … ’ 22 sovereign immunity, or state a claim.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Nov 13, 2023
immunity, and that Wilson was not entitled to 20 damages. … But she concluded there were questions of fact about whether 5 Poor threatened Wilson with violence in retaliation for Wilson threatening to file a 6 grievance, and that Poor was not entitled to qualified immunity on
Cited 0 timesUnknown278 F. 180 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Sep 30, 1921
C.) 156 Fed. 845 , the court said: "Her officers and crew were well qualified. … The duty to “keep a suitable number of watchmen” on a passenger steamer at sea is clearly on the master.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · Dec 2, 2025
Plaintiff filed objections to the 3 recommendations that: (1) Officer Phan is entitled to qualified immunity on the § 1983 claims 4 under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, (2) the public duty doctrine bars a negligence … Accordingly, the Court concurs that Officer 9 Phan is entitled to qualified immunity on Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment excessive force claim. 10 Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim is DISMISSED.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna